Literature DB >> 21445616

A new approach to assess movements and isometric postures of spine and trunk at the workplace.

Max Wunderlich1, Thomas Rüther, Dieter Essfeld, Thomas C Erren, Claus Piekarski, Dieter Leyk.   

Abstract

Low back pain is regarded as the primary cause of occupational disability in many countries worldwide. However, there is a lack of valid assessment of kinematic spine and trunk parameters to provide further insight into occupational spine loads. A new 3-dimensional mobile measurement system (3D-SpineMoveGuard) was developed and evaluated by means of repeated dynamic and isometric trunk positions by 10 male and 10 female volunteers. The interclass correlation coefficient indicates high test-retest reliability (r = 0.975-0.999) of the 3D-SpineMoveGuard. Moreover, analysis of validity revealed almost identical results for the new measurement system. The evaluation study indicates a good scientific quality for the use in occupational task analyses. The objective assessment of indirectly measured spine and trunk kinematics will give further insight to predict and prevent job-related spine loads.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21445616      PMCID: PMC3175845          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1777-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  25 in total

1.  Physical exposure assessment in monotonous repetitive work--the PRIM study.

Authors:  N Fallentin; B Juul-Kristensen; S Mikkelsen; J H Andersen; J P Bonde; P Frost; L Endahl
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.024

2.  Assessment of work postures and movements using a video-based observation method and direct technical measurements.

Authors:  B Juul-Kristensen; G A Hansson; N Fallentin; J H Andersen; C Ekdahl
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 3.  Working postures: a literature review.

Authors:  Edgar Ramos Vieira; Shrawan Kumar
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-06

4.  Continuous monitoring of spine geometry: a new approach to study back pain in space.

Authors:  K Baum; S Hoy; D Essfeld
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.118

Review 5.  Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain at work: evidence review.

Authors:  G Waddell; A K Burton
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.611

6.  A comparison of working postures of parcel sorters using three different working methods.

Authors:  J C Derksen; M P Van Riel; J P Van Wingerden; C J Snijders
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 7.  Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain.

Authors:  W E Hoogendoorn; M N van Poppel; P M Bongers; B W Koes; L M Bouter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  A novel system for the dynamic assessment of back shape.

Authors:  William R Taylor; Tobias Consmüller; Antonius Rohlmann
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 2.242

9.  Low back pain and lumbago-sciatica in nurses and a reference group of clerks: results of a comparative prevalence study in Germany.

Authors:  Friedrich Hofmann; Ulrich Stössel; Martina Michaelis; Matthias Nübling; Achim Siegel
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2002-06-26       Impact factor: 3.015

10.  Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorder among workers in Taiwan: a nationwide study.

Authors:  How-Ran Guo; Ya-Ching Chang; Wen-Yu Yeh; Chun-Wan Chen; Yueliang L Guo
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.708

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of a novel measurement tool to assess lumbar spine posture and range of motion.

Authors:  Tobias Consmüller; Antonius Rohlmann; Daniel Weinland; Claudia Druschel; Georg N Duda; William R Taylor
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Comparison of three validated systems to analyse spinal shape and motion.

Authors:  Bettina Dreischarf; Esther Koch; Marcel Dreischarf; Hendrik Schmidt; Matthias Pumberger; Luis Becker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Validation of a novel spinal posture monitor: comparison with digital videofluoroscopy.

Authors:  Kieran O'Sullivan; Sabine Verschueren; Steven Pans; David Smets; Karel Dekelver; Wim Dankaerts
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Velocity of lordosis angle during spinal flexion and extension.

Authors:  Tobias Consmüller; Antonius Rohlmann; Daniel Weinland; Claudia Druschel; Georg N Duda; William R Taylor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Measurement and Geometric Modelling of Human Spine Posture for Medical Rehabilitation Purposes Using a Wearable Monitoring System Based on Inertial Sensors.

Authors:  Gheorghe-Daniel Voinea; Silviu Butnariu; Gheorghe Mogan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Reliability of photographic posture analysis of adolescents.

Authors:  Zeynep Hazar; Gul Oznur Karabicak; Ugur Tiftikci
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-10-30

7.  The association between pelvic asymmetry and non-specific chronic low back pain as assessed by the global postural system.

Authors:  Qiuhua Yu; Huanjie Huang; Zhou Zhang; Xiaoqian Hu; Wenfeng Li; Le Li; Min Chen; Zhenwen Liang; Wai Leung Ambrose Lo; Chuhuai Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Surgeon's Neck Posture during Spine Surgeries: "The Unrecognised Potential Occupational Hazard".

Authors:  J Naresh-Babu; Viswanadha Arun-Kumar; D G S Raju
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.251

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.