Literature DB >> 25238799

Measurement of the number of lumbar spinal movements in the sagittal plane in a 24-hour period.

Antonius Rohlmann1, Tobias Consmüller, Marcel Dreischarf, Maxim Bashkuev, Alexander Disch, Esther Pries, Georg N Duda, Hendrik Schmidt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Little is known about the number of spinal movements in the sagittal plane in daily life, mainly due to the lack of adequate techniques to assess these movements. Our aim was to measure these movements in asymptomatic volunteers.
METHODS: Two sensor strips based on strain gauge technology (Epionics SPINE system) were fixed on the skin surface of the back parallel to the spine on a total of 208 volunteers without back pain. First, the lordosis angle was determined during relaxed standing. The volunteers were then released to daily life. The increases and decreases in the back lumbar lordosis angle over a period of 24 h were determined and classified into 5° increments. Changes in the lordosis angle greater than 5° were considered.
RESULTS: The median number of spinal movements performed within 24 h was approximately 4,400. Of these movements, 66 % were between 5° and 10°. The proportions of higher-magnitude lordosis angle changes were much lower (e.g., 3 % for the 20-25° movement bin). Surprisingly, the median total number of movements was significantly higher (29 %) in women than in men. Large inter-individual differences were observed in the number of movements performed. The volunteers spent a median of 4.9 h with the lumbar spine flexed between 20° and 30° and only 24 min with the spine extended relative to the reference standing position. A median of 50 movements reached or exceeded full-flexion angle and zero movements full-extension angle.
CONCLUSIONS: These data illustrate the predominantly small range of movement of the spine during daily activities and the small amount of time spent in extension. These unique data strongly contribute to the understanding of patients' everyday behavior, which might affect the development and testing of spinal implants and the evaluation of surgical and nonsurgical treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25238799     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3588-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  20 in total

1.  An electronic inclinometer technique for measuring lumbar curvature.

Authors:  M A Adams; P Dolan; C Marx; W C Hutton
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Can extra-articular strains be used to measure facet contact forces in the lumbar spine? An in-vitro biomechanical study.

Authors:  Q A Zhu; Y B Park; S G Sjovold; C A Niosi; D C Wilson; P A Cripton; T R Oxland
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.617

3.  Method for objective assessment of physical work load at the workplace.

Authors:  H J Busser; W G de Korte; E B Glerum; R C van Lummel
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Time trends for step-determined physical activity among Japanese adults.

Authors:  Shigeru Inoue; Yumiko Ohya; Catrine Tudor-Locke; Shigeho Tanaka; Nobuo Yoshiike; Teruichi Shimomitsu
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Back surface curvature and measurement of lumbar spinal motion.

Authors:  I A Stokes; T M Bevins; R A Lunn
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The lumbar spine in backward bending.

Authors:  M A Adams; P Dolan; W C Hutton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Sagittal plane deformity: an overview of interpretation and management.

Authors:  Pierre Roussouly; Colin Nnadi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Comparative evaluation of a novel measurement tool to assess lumbar spine posture and range of motion.

Authors:  Tobias Consmüller; Antonius Rohlmann; Daniel Weinland; Claudia Druschel; Georg N Duda; William R Taylor
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Pedometer-measured physical activity and health behaviors in U.S. adults.

Authors:  David R Bassett; Holly R Wyatt; Helen Thompson; John C Peters; James O Hill
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Effects of low back pain on the relationship between the movements of the lumbar spine and hip.

Authors:  Thomas K T Wong; Raymond Y W Lee
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.161

View more
  7 in total

1.  [Epionics SPINE-use of an objective method to examine spinal mobility in patients with axial spondyloarthritis].

Authors:  D Kiefer; X Baraliakos; B Bühring; U Kiltz; J Braun
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  Preclinical evaluation of posterior spine stabilization devices: can the current standards represent basic everyday life activities?

Authors:  Luigi La Barbera; Fabio Galbusera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Tomaso Villa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Preclinical evaluation of posterior spine stabilization devices: can we compare in vitro and in vivo loads on the instrumentation?

Authors:  Luigi La Barbera; Fabio Galbusera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Tomaso Villa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  ISSLS Prize in Bioengineering Science 2021: in vivo sagittal motion of the lumbar spine in low back pain patients-a radiological big data study.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Frank Niemeyer; Youping Tao; Andrea Cina; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Annette Kienle; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  INVESTIGATION OF OPTIMAL LUMBAR SPINE POSTURE DURING A SIMULATED LANDING TASK IN ELITE GYMNASTS.

Authors:  Lawrence Sonvico; Simon M Spencer; Louise Fawcett; Jonathan Bucke; Nicola R Heneghan; Alison Rushton
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-02

6.  Lag-Screw Osteosynthesis in Thoracolumbar Pincer Fractures.

Authors:  Marc Auerswald; Philipp Messer-Hannemann; Kay Sellenschloh; Jan Wahlefeld; Klaus Püschel; Sven Hirschfeld Araujo; Michael M Morlock; Arndt P Schulz; Gerd Huber
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-08-03

7.  Electronics with shape actuation for minimally invasive spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Ben J Woodington; Vincenzo F Curto; Yi-Lin Yu; Héctor Martínez-Domínguez; Lawrence Coles; George G Malliaras; Christopher M Proctor; Damiano G Barone
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 14.136

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.