Literature DB >> 21615895

Characteristic values of the lumbar load of manual patient handling for the application in workers' compensation procedures.

Claus Jordan1, Alwin Luttmann1, Andreas Theilmeier2, Stefan Kuhn3, Norbert Wortmann4, Matthias Jäger1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The human spine is often exposed to mechanical load in vocational activities especially in combination with lifting, carrying and positioning of heavy objects. This also applies in particular to nursing activities with manual patient handling. In the present study a detailed investigation on the load of the lumbar spine during manual patient handling was performed.
METHODS: For a total of 13 presumably endangering activities with transferring a patient, the body movements performed by healthcare workers were recorded and the exerted action forces were determined with regard to magnitude, direction and lateral distribution in the time course with a "measuring bed", a "measuring chair" and a "measuring floor". By the application of biomechanical model calculations the load on the lowest intervertebral disc of the lumbar spine (L5-S1) was determined considering the posture and action force data for every manual patient handling.
RESULTS: The results of the investigations reveal the occurrence of high lumbar load during manual patient handling activities, especially in those cases, where awkward postures of the healthcare worker are combined with high action forces caused by the patient's mass. These findings were compared to suitable issues of corresponding investigations provided in the literature. Furthermore measurement-based characteristic values of lumbar load were derived for the use in statement procedures concerning the disease no. 2108 of the German list of occupational diseases.
CONCLUSIONS: To protect healthcare workers from mechanical overload and the risk of developing a disc-related disease, prevention measures should be compiled. Such measures could include the application of "back-fairer" nursing techniques and the use of "technical" and" small aids" to reduce the lumbar load during manual patient handling. Further studies, concerning these aspects, are necessary.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21615895      PMCID: PMC3126787          DOI: 10.1186/1745-6673-6-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol        ISSN: 1745-6673            Impact factor:   2.646


  10 in total

1.  Biomechanical analysis of the effect of changing patient-handling technique.

Authors:  B Schibye; A Faber Hansen; C T Hye-Knudsen; M Essendrop; M Böcher; J Skotte
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.661

2.  A dynamic 3D biomechanical evaluation of the load on the low back during different patient-handling tasks.

Authors:  J H Skotte; M Essendrop; A F Hansen; B Schibye
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Competency-based training for patient handling.

Authors:  Sue Hignett; Emma Crumpton
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  Quantitative measurement of stressful trunk postures in nursing professions.

Authors:  Sonja Freitag; Rolf Ellegast; Madeleine Dulon; Albert Nienhaus
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2007-06

5.  Measurement of action forces and posture to determine the lumbar load of healthcare workers during care activities with patient transfers.

Authors:  Andreas Theilmeier; Claus Jordan; Alwin Luttmann; Matthias Jäger
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2010-09-17

6.  Low back pain among nurses: a follow-up beginning at entry to the nursing school.

Authors:  Tapio Videman; Anneli Ojajärvi; Hilkka Riihimäki; J D G Troup
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Lumbar spine forces during manoeuvring of ceiling-based and floor-based patient transfer devices.

Authors:  W S Marras; G G Knapik; S Ferguson
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 8.  Intervention strategies to reduce musculoskeletal injuries associated with handling patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Hignett
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Cumulative occupational lumbar load and lumbar disc disease--results of a German multi-center case-control study (EPILIFT).

Authors:  Andreas Seidler; Annekatrin Bergmann; Matthias Jäger; Rolf Ellegast; Dirk Ditchen; Gine Elsner; Joachim Grifka; Johannes Haerting; Friedrich Hofmann; Oliver Linhardt; Alwin Luttmann; Martina Michaelis; Gabriela Petereit-Haack; Barbara Schumann; Ulrich Bolm-Audorff
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Biopsychosocial factors are associated with low back pain in female nursing students: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Tim Mitchell; Peter B O'Sullivan; Anne Smith; Angus F Burnett; Leon Straker; Jenny Thornton; Cobie J Rudd
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 5.837

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Determining the Efficiency of Ergonomic Belt During Patient Handling and its Effect on Reducing Musculoskeletal Disorders in Nurses.

Authors:  Seyed Abolfazl Zakerian; Mansooreh Afzalinejhad; Mahmood Mahmodi; Niloofar Sheibani
Journal:  SAGE Open Nurs       Date:  2021-12-01

2.  What do healthcare workers in elderly care know about occupational health and safety? An explorative survey.

Authors:  Stefanie Schönrock; Anja Schablon; Albert Nienhaus; Claudia Peters
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.646

3.  Physiotherapists working in clinics have increased risk for new-onset spine disorders: a 12-year population-based study.

Authors:  Jen-Chieh Liao; Chung-Han Ho; Haw-Yen Chiu; Yu-Lin Wang; Li-Chieh Kuo; Cheng Liu; Jhi-Joung Wang; Sher-Wei Lim; Jinn-Rung Kuo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.