Literature DB >> 16895453

Discrimination of amplitude spectrum slope in the fovea and parafovea and the local amplitude distributions of natural scene imagery.

Bruce C Hansen1, Robert F Hess.   

Abstract

A number of studies have investigated whether human visual performance can be related to the general form of the amplitude spectra (i.e., 1/f(alpha)) of natural scenes. Here, it is argued that there are some discrepancies in the data between some of those studies and that one possible explanation for the discrepancies may be related to differences in methodology (e.g., stimuli presented to the fovea as opposed to the parafovea). We sought to resolve some of the discrepancies with two psychophysical paradigms involving alpha discrimination with visual noise and natural scene image patches presented to the fovea or parafovea. Fovea-parafovea threshold differences were apparent for stimuli possessing alpha values < 1.0, with the parafovea typically showing highest thresholds for reference alpha values in the 0.74-0.85 range. Both fovea and parafovea thresholds were lowest in the 1.2-1.4 range. In addition, we conducted a local amplitude distribution analysis (i.e., assessed local alpha) with a large set of high-resolution natural scene imagery and found that the results of that analysis provided a better account of the alpha discrimination thresholds for stimuli presented to the fovea as opposed to the parafovea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16895453     DOI: 10.1167/6.7.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  14 in total

1.  Natural images dominate in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Erich W Graf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Visual discomfort and flicker.

Authors:  Sanae Yoshimoto; Jesel Garcia; Fang Jiang; Arnold J Wilkins; Tatsuto Takeuchi; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Non-uniform phase sensitivity in spatial frequency maps of the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Reza Farivar; Simon Clavagnier; Bruce C Hansen; Ben Thompson; Robert F Hess
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  (In) sensitivity to spatial distortion in natural scenes.

Authors:  Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Adaptation and visual discomfort from flicker.

Authors:  Sanae Yoshimoto; Fang Jiang; Tatsuto Takeuchi; Arnold J Wilkins; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Infant Preference for Natural Texture Statistics is Modulated by Contrast Polarity.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Rebecca Woods
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2014 May-Jun

7.  Visual segmentation of complex naturalistic structures in an infant eye-tracking search task.

Authors:  Karola Schlegelmilch; Annie E Wertz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Discriminating natural image statistics from neuronal population codes.

Authors:  Satohiro Tajima; Masato Okada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Perceived blur in naturally contoured images depends on phase.

Authors:  Stephanie Murray; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-12-02

10.  Beauty and the beholder: the role of visual sensitivity in visual preference.

Authors:  Branka Spehar; Solomon Wong; Sarah van de Klundert; Jessie Lui; Colin W G Clifford; Richard P Taylor
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.