Literature DB >> 19283422

Effects of different technical coordinate system definitions on the three dimensional representation of the glenohumeral joint centre.

Amity Cree Campbell1, J A Alderson, D G Lloyd, B C Elliott.   

Abstract

This study aimed to find the most appropriate marker location, or combination thereof, for the centre of the humeral head (Wang et al. in J Biomech 31: 899-908, 1998) location representation during humeral motion. Ten male participants underwent three MRI scans in three different humeral postures. Seven technical coordinate systems (TCS) were defined from various combinations of an acromion, distal upper arm and proximal upper arm clusters of markers in a custom Matlab program. The CHH location was transformed between postures and then compared with the original MRI CHH location. The results demonstrated that following the performance of two near 180 degrees humeral elevations, a combined acromion TCS and proximal upper arm TCS produced an average error of 23 +/- 9 mm, and 18 +/- 4 mm, which was significantly smaller (p < 0.01) than any other TCS. A combination of acromion and proximal upper arm TCSs should therefore be used to reference the CHH location when analysing movements incorporating large ranges of shoulder motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19283422     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-009-0467-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  22 in total

1.  Correcting for deformation in skin-based marker systems.

Authors:  E J Alexander; T P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  The glenohumeral joint rotation centre in vivo.

Authors:  M Stokdijk; J Nagels; P M Rozing
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Quantification of soft tissue artefact in motion analysis by combining 3D fluoroscopy and stereophotogrammetry: a study on two subjects.

Authors:  Rita Stagni; Silvia Fantozzi; Angelo Cappello; Alberto Leardini
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 4.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand.

Authors:  Ge Wu; Frans C T van der Helm; H E J DirkJan Veeger; Mohsen Makhsous; Peter Van Roy; Carolyn Anglin; Jochem Nagels; Andrew R Karduna; Kevin McQuade; Xuguang Wang; Frederick W Werner; Bryan Buchholz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  In vivo validation of a new technique that compensates for soft tissue artefact in the upper-arm: preliminary results.

Authors:  Andrea Giovanni Cutti; Angelo Cappello; Angelo Davalli
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Soft tissue artifact compensation in knee kinematics by double anatomical landmark calibration: performance of a novel method during selected motor tasks.

Authors:  Angelo Cappello; Rita Stagni; Silvia Fantozzi; Alberto Leardini
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Propagation of anatomical landmark misplacement to knee kinematics: performance of single and double calibration.

Authors:  Rita Stagni; Silvia Fantozzi; Angelo Cappello
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  Three-dimensional modelling of the motion range of axial rotation of the upper arm.

Authors:  X Wang; M Maurin; F Mazet; N De Castro Maia; K Voinot; J P Verriest; M Fayet
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Parameters for modeling the upper extremity.

Authors:  H E Veeger; B Yu; K N An; R H Rozendal
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 10.  Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 3. Soft tissue artifact assessment and compensation.

Authors:  Alberto Leardini; Lorenzo Chiari; Ugo Della Croce; Aurelio Cappozzo
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.840

View more
  5 in total

1.  Shoulder biomechanics: today's consensus and tomorrow's perspectives.

Authors:  Andrea Giovanni Cutti; H E J DirkJan Veeger
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  The inter-tester repeatability of a model for analysing elbow flexion-extension during overhead sporting movements.

Authors:  Denny J M Wells; Cyril J Donnelly; Bruce C Elliott; Kane J Middleton; Jacqueline A Alderson
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Comparison of the kinematics and kinetics of shoulder exercises performed with constant and elastic resistance.

Authors:  Ramona Häberle; Florian Schellenberg; Renate List; Michael Plüss; William R Taylor; Silvio Lorenzetti
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-11-28

4.  Synthesising 2D Video from 3D Motion Data for Machine Learning Applications.

Authors:  Marion Mundt; Henrike Oberlack; Molly Goldacre; Julia Powles; Johannes Funken; Corey Morris; Wolfgang Potthast; Jacqueline Alderson
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  The centre of rotation of the shoulder complex and the effect of normalisation.

Authors:  Celia Amabile; Anthony M J Bull; Angela E Kedgley
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.712

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.