Literature DB >> 11006387

The glenohumeral joint rotation centre in vivo.

M Stokdijk1, J Nagels, P M Rozing.   

Abstract

Within the framework of the current call for standardization in upper extremity research, three methods to determine the glenohumeral joint rotation centre in vivo were tested. Therefore, subjects performed humeral movements, while a 3D electromagnetic tracking device registered the motion of the humerus with respect to the scapula. For the first method to estimate the glenohumeral joint rotation centre five scapular bony landmarks served as input to regression equations. The second method fitted a sphere through the humeral position data and the third method calculated the rotation centre determining an optimal helical axis. The experiment consisted of two parts, at first one subject was measured 10 times, subsequently one observer measured 10 subjects twice and another observer measured these subjects once. The first part of the experiment demonstrated that all methods are capable to reproduce the rotation centre within 4mm, but the location of the centre differed significantly between methods (p<0.001). The second part, showed that inter- and intra-observer reliability was sufficiently for the sphere-fitting method and for the helical-axes method. The two observations of one observer differed significantly (p<0.008) using the regression method. The authors prefer the helical-axes method, it is a reliable and valid method which can be applied in movement registration of healthy subjects and patients with a shoulder endoprosthesis, it can be applied in hinge joints to determine a rotation axis instead of a rotation centre which is desirable in standardized upper extremity research, and calculation time is short.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11006387     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00121-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  13 in total

1.  Validation of a new model-based tracking technique for measuring three-dimensional, in vivo glenohumeral joint kinematics.

Authors:  Michael J Bey; Roger Zauel; Stephanie K Brock; Scott Tashman
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 2.  Glenohumeral motion: review of measurement techniques.

Authors:  A M Hill; A M J Bull; R J Dallalana; A L Wallace; G R Johnson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Effects of different technical coordinate system definitions on the three dimensional representation of the glenohumeral joint centre.

Authors:  Amity Cree Campbell; J A Alderson; D G Lloyd; B C Elliott
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Helical axis calculation based on Burmester theory: experimental comparison with traditional techniques for human tibiotalar joint motion.

Authors:  N Sancisi; V Parenti-Castelli; F Corazza; A Leardini
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Scapular contribution for the end-range of shoulder axial rotation in overhead athletes.

Authors:  Andrea Ribeiro; Augusto Gil Pascoal
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Position of the rotator cuff footprint in relation to the centre of rotation of the humeral head.

Authors:  Ethan Caruana; Carlos Wigderowitz; Fraser Harrold
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-01-22

7.  Comparison of two methods for in vivo estimation of the glenohumeral joint rotation center (GH-JRC) of the patients with shoulder hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  Ali Asadi Nikooyan; Frans C T van der Helm; Peter Westerhoff; Friedmar Graichen; Georg Bergmann; H E J Dirkjan Veeger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Trunk and shoulder kinematic and kinetic and electromyographic adaptations to slope increase during motorized treadmill propulsion among manual wheelchair users with a spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Dany Gagnon; Annie-Claude Babineau; Audrey Champagne; Guillaume Desroches; Rachid Aissaoui
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Tool use ability depends on understanding of functional dynamics and not specific joint contribution profiles.

Authors:  Ross Parry; Gilles Dietrich; Blandine Bril
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-04-23

10.  The centre of rotation of the shoulder complex and the effect of normalisation.

Authors:  Celia Amabile; Anthony M J Bull; Angela E Kedgley
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.