Literature DB >> 19276293

Can the Wolf Motor Function Test be streamlined?

Kimberly Bogard1, Steven Wolf, Qin Zhang, Paul Thompson, David Morris, Deborah Nichols-Larsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To assess upper extremity (UE) capabilities following stroke, the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) measures time to complete 15 UE tasks and 2 strength tasks, but takes 30 to 45 minutes for the clinician to complete.
OBJECTIVE: In an effort to streamline the WMFT, this study evaluated the association between the magnitude of improvement on any timed task of the WMFT and the change score on all other tasks among participants in the Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation (EXCITE) trial.
METHODS: This association was evaluated using regression methods according to chronicity and controlling for key covariates (functional level, gender, concordance) for log mean WMFT scores.
RESULTS: After controlling for covariates, 6 tasks (hand to table [front], hand to box [front], reach and retrieve, lift can, lift pencil, and fold towel) influenced the overall WMFT score for survivors meeting EXCITE criteria and treated within 3 to 9 months poststroke. Six different tasks (extend elbow weight, hand to box [front], lift can, lift pencil, turn key in lock, and fold towel) influenced the overall WMFT score for those receiving constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) 1 year later. The importance of certain tasks relative to others may best represent overall UE function, but this streamlining enables the clinician to prioritize these tasks in the evaluation.
CONCLUSIONS: The delineation of those tasks depends on the time poststroke from enrollment to CIMT. This study demonstrates that the WMFT can be streamlined from 17 to 6 tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19276293      PMCID: PMC3754424          DOI: 10.1177/1545968308331141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  26 in total

1.  Initiation and development of fingertip forces during whole-hand grasping.

Authors:  R Reilmann; A M Gordon; H Henningsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke.

Authors:  S L Wolf; P A Catlin; M Ellis; A L Archer; B Morgan; A Piacentino
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke.

Authors:  J Whitall; S McCombe Waller; K H Silver; R F Macko
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  The relationship of extraneous movements to lumbar paraspinal muscle activity: implications for EMG biofeedback training applications to low back pain patients.

Authors:  S L Wolf; L B Wolf; R L Segal
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1989-03

5.  Predicting improvement in the upper paretic limb after stroke: a longitudinal prospective study.

Authors:  Gert Kwakkel; Boudewijn Kollen
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 6.  Stroke in a defined elderly population, 1967-1985. A less lethal and disabling but no less common disease.

Authors:  W H Barker; J P Mullooly
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Grip force control during object manipulation in cerebral stroke.

Authors:  J Hermsdörfer; E Hagl; D A Nowak; C Marquardt
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient. Changes in upper extremity neuromuscular and functional status.

Authors:  S L Wolf; S A Binder-MacLeod
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1983-09

9.  Methods for a multisite randomized trial to investigate the effect of constraint-induced movement therapy in improving upper extremity function among adults recovering from a cerebrovascular stroke.

Authors:  Carolee J Winstein; J Philip Miller; Sarah Blanton; Edward Taub; Gitendra Uswatte; David Morris; Deborah Nichols; Steven Wolf
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.919

10.  Deficits of predictive grip force control during object manipulation in acute stroke.

Authors:  Dennis A Nowak; Joachim Hermsdörfer; Helge Topka
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.849

View more
  15 in total

1.  Personalized upper limb training combined with anodal-tDCS for sensorimotor recovery in spastic hemiparesis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mindy F Levin; Melanie C Baniña; Silvi Frenkel-Toledo; Sigal Berman; Nachum Soroker; John M Solomon; Dario G Liebermann
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.279

2.  Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of an adapted Wolf motor function test for older patients with shoulder injuries.

Authors:  Corinna Oberle; Clemens Becker; Sabine Schölch; Joerg-Uwe Lenz; Stefan Studier-Fischer; Peter Augat; Lars Schwickert
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 1.281

3.  Measurement structure of the Wolf Motor Function Test: implications for motor control theory.

Authors:  Michelle Woodbury; Craig A Velozo; Paul A Thompson; Kathye Light; Gitendra Uswatte; Edward Taub; Carolee J Winstein; David Morris; Sarah Blanton; Deborah S Nichols-Larsen; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 3.919

4.  Combined central and peripheral stimulation to facilitate motor recovery after stroke: the effect of number of sessions on outcome.

Authors:  Robert Lindenberg; Lin L Zhu; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Spasticity may obscure motor learning ability after stroke.

Authors:  Sandeep K Subramanian; Anatol G Feldman; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Home-based telerehabilitation shows improved upper limb function in adults with chronic stroke: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jeanne Langan; Kelsey Delave; Lauren Phillips; Percival Pangilinan; Susan H Brown
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Efficacy and safety of non-immersive virtual reality exercising in stroke rehabilitation (EVREST): a randomised, multicentre, single-blind, controlled trial.

Authors:  Gustavo Saposnik; Leonardo G Cohen; Muhammad Mamdani; Sepideth Pooyania; Michelle Ploughman; Donna Cheung; Jennifer Shaw; Judith Hall; Peter Nord; Sean Dukelow; Yongchai Nilanont; Felipe De Los Rios; Lisandro Olmos; Mindy Levin; Robert Teasell; Ashley Cohen; Kevin Thorpe; Andreas Laupacis; Mark Bayley
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 44.182

8.  5 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the ipsilesional sensory cortex enhances motor learning after stroke.

Authors:  Sonia M Brodie; Sean Meehan; Michael R Borich; Lara A Boyd
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  The Brief Kinesthesia test is feasible and sensitive: a study in stroke.

Authors:  Alexandra Borstad; Deborah S Nichols-Larsen
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Frontoparietal white matter integrity predicts haptic performance in chronic stroke.

Authors:  Alexandra L Borstad; Seongjin Choi; Petra Schmalbrock; Deborah S Nichols-Larsen
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 4.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.