Literature DB >> 29301545

Personalized upper limb training combined with anodal-tDCS for sensorimotor recovery in spastic hemiparesis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Mindy F Levin1,2,3, Melanie C Baniña4,5, Silvi Frenkel-Toledo6,7, Sigal Berman8, Nachum Soroker7,9, John M Solomon10, Dario G Liebermann6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recovery of voluntary movement is a main rehabilitation goal. Efforts to identify effective upper limb (UL) interventions after stroke have been unsatisfactory. This study includes personalized impairment-based UL reaching training in virtual reality (VR) combined with non-invasive brain stimulation to enhance motor learning. The approach is guided by limiting reaching training to the angular zone in which active control is preserved ("active control zone") after identification of a "spasticity zone". Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) is used to facilitate activation of the affected hemisphere and enhance inter-hemispheric balance. The purpose of the study is to investigate the effectiveness of personalized reaching training, with and without a-tDCS, to increase the range of active elbow control and improve UL function.
METHODS: This single-blind randomized controlled trial will take place at four academic rehabilitation centers in Canada, India and Israel. The intervention involves 10 days of personalized VR reaching training with both groups receiving the same intensity of treatment. Participants with sub-acute stroke aged 25 to 80 years with elbow spasticity will be randomized to one of three groups: personalized training (reaching within individually determined active control zones) with a-tDCS (group 1) or sham-tDCS (group 2), or non-personalized training (reaching regardless of active control zones) with a-tDCS (group 3). A baseline assessment will be performed at randomization and two follow-up assessments will occur at the end of the intervention and at 1 month post intervention. Main outcomes are elbow-flexor spatial threshold and ratio of spasticity zone to full elbow-extension range. Secondary outcomes include the Modified Ashworth Scale, Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Streamlined Wolf Motor Function Test and UL kinematics during a standardized reach-to-grasp task. DISCUSSION: This study will provide evidence on the effectiveness of personalized treatment on spasticity and UL motor ability and feasibility of using low-cost interventions in low-to-middle-income countries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02725853 . Initially registered on 12 January 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neurorehabilitation; Spasticity; Spatial threshold; Stroke; tDCS

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29301545      PMCID: PMC5755182          DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2377-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trials        ISSN: 1745-6215            Impact factor:   2.279


  38 in total

1.  Space and time in the context of equilibrium-point theory.

Authors:  Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-08-31

2.  Intermanual Differences in movement-related interhemispheric inhibition.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Nagako Murase; Pablo Celnik; Friedhelm Hummel; Michelle Harris-Love; Riccardo Mazzocchio; Etienne Olivier; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Kinematics of human arm reconstructed from spatial tracking system recordings.

Authors:  E V Biryukova; A Roby-Brami; A A Frolov; M Mokhtari
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials.

Authors:  An-Wen Chan; Jennifer M Tetzlaff; Peter C Gøtzsche; Douglas G Altman; Howard Mann; Jesse A Berlin; Kay Dickersin; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Kenneth F Schulz; Wendy R Parulekar; Karmela Krleza-Jeric; Andreas Laupacis; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-01-08

5.  The influence of different descending systems on the tonic stretch reflex in the cat.

Authors:  A G Feldman; G N Orlovsky
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 5.330

6.  Validity of movement pattern kinematics as measures of arm motor impairment poststroke.

Authors:  Sandeep K Subramanian; Juri Yamanaka; Gevorg Chilingaryan; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment.

Authors:  C Gowland; P Stratford; M Ward; J Moreland; W Torresin; S Van Hullenaar; J Sanford; S Barreca; B Vanspall; N Plews
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Ipsilesional anodal tDCS enhances the functional benefits of rehabilitation in patients after stroke.

Authors:  Claire Allman; Ugwechi Amadi; Anderson M Winkler; Leigh Wilkins; Nicola Filippini; Udo Kischka; Charlotte J Stagg; Heidi Johansen-Berg
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  Interhemispheric control of unilateral movement.

Authors:  Vincent Beaulé; Sara Tremblay; Hugo Théoret
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 10.  Motor control and neural plasticity through interhemispheric interactions.

Authors:  Naoyuki Takeuchi; Yutaka Oouchida; Shin-Ichi Izumi
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.599

View more
  5 in total

1.  Analysis of the Factors Related to the Effectiveness of Transcranial Current Stimulation in Upper Limb Motor Function Recovery after Stroke: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  María Antonia Fuentes Calderón; Ainhoa Navarro Miralles; Mauricio Jaramillo Pimienta; Jesús María Gonçalves Estella; María José Sánchez Ledesma
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Shared and distinct voxel-based lesion-symptom mappings for spasticity and impaired movement in the hemiparetic upper limb.

Authors:  Silvi Frenkel-Toledo; Mindy F Levin; Sigal Berman; Dario G Liebermann; Melanie C Baniña; John M Solomon; Shay Ofir-Geva; Nachum Soroker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Effect of post-stroke spasticity on voluntary movement of the upper limb.

Authors:  Hadar Lackritz; Yisrael Parmet; Silvi Frenkel-Toledo; Melanie C Baniña; Nachum Soroker; John M Solomon; Dario G Liebermann; Mindy F Levin; Sigal Berman
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.262

4.  Bilateral Motor Cortex tDCS Effects on Post-Stroke Pain and Spasticity: A Three Cases Study.

Authors:  Andrés Molero-Chamizo; Ángeles Salas Sánchez; Belén Álvarez Batista; Carlos Cordero García; Rafael Andújar Barroso; G Nathzidy Rivera-Urbina; Michael A Nitsche; José R Alameda Bailén
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 5.810

5.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people after stroke.

Authors:  Bernhard Elsner; Joachim Kugler; Marcus Pohl; Jan Mehrholz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-11-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.