Literature DB >> 2526659

The relationship of extraneous movements to lumbar paraspinal muscle activity: implications for EMG biofeedback training applications to low back pain patients.

S L Wolf1, L B Wolf, R L Segal.   

Abstract

Within recent years clinicians and researchers have applied paraspinal EMG biofeedback procedures during static and dynamic movement retraining of chronic low back pain patients. Most of these applications make use of surface electromyography, an approach complicated by the fact that the erector spinae muscles are deeply situated. This descriptive study reveals that extraneous movements, such as neck flexion and pelvic rotation, can elicit profound activity from percutaneously placed EMG electrodes while little change is seen at the skin surface. The implications of these observations for the use of EMG feedback to remediate low back pain are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2526659     DOI: 10.1007/bf00999341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul        ISSN: 0363-3586


  16 in total

1.  The use of EMG feedback and progressive relaxation in the treatment of a woman with chronic back pain.

Authors:  C D Belar; J L Cohen
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1979-12

2.  A fresh look at the intrinsic muscles of the back.

Authors:  J V Basmajian
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Reliability of lumbar paravertebral EMG assessment in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  D K Ahern; M J Follick; J R Council; N Laser-Wolston
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  The functions of individual muscles in the lumbar part of the spinae muscle.

Authors:  B Jonsson
Journal:  Electromyography       Date:  1970 Jan-Apr

5.  Patterns of muscular activity during movement in patients with chronic low-back pain.

Authors:  A Nouwen; P F Van Akkerveeken; J M Versloot
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Quantitative studies of the flexion-relaxation phenomenon in the back muscles.

Authors:  A B Schultz; K Haderspeck-Grib; G Sinkora; D N Warwick
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Electromyographic assessment of chronic low-back pain syndrome.

Authors:  W H Hoyt; H H Hunt; M A De Pauw; D Bard; F Shaffer; J N Passias; D H Robbins; D G Runyon; S E Semrad; J T Symonds; K C Watt
Journal:  J Am Osteopath Assoc       Date:  1981-07

8.  Efficacy of EMG biofeedback, pseudotherapy, and conventional medical treatment for chronic rheumatic back pain.

Authors:  Herta Flor; Gunther Haag; Dennis C Turk; Helmut Koehler
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Paralumbar muscle activity in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  E Kravitz; M E Moore; A Glaros
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Behavioral treatment of chronic low back pain: clinical outcome and individual differences in pain relief.

Authors:  Francis J Keefe; Andrew R Block; Redford B Williams; Richard S Surwit
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  4 in total

1.  Assessment of lumbar EMG during static and dynamic activity in pain- free normals: implications for muscle scanning protocols.

Authors:  S L Wolf
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1995-12

2.  Can the Wolf Motor Function Test be streamlined?

Authors:  Kimberly Bogard; Steven Wolf; Qin Zhang; Paul Thompson; David Morris; Deborah Nichols-Larsen
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  Age and gender related neuromuscular changes in trunk flexion-extension.

Authors:  Thomas Kienbacher; Birgit Paul; Richard Habenicht; Christian Starek; Markus Wolf; Josef Kollmitzer; Patrick Mair; Gerold Ebenbichler
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 4.262

4.  Age and gender related neuromuscular pattern during trunk flexion-extension in chronic low back pain patients.

Authors:  Thomas Kienbacher; Elisabeth Fehrmann; Richard Habenicht; Daniela Koller; Christian Oeffel; Josef Kollmitzer; Patrick Mair; Gerold Ebenbichler
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.262

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.