Literature DB >> 9040676

Stroke in a defined elderly population, 1967-1985. A less lethal and disabling but no less common disease.

W H Barker1, J P Mullooly.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Decline in stroke mortality in recent decades has been well documented in the United States and other countries. This study, based on a well-defined population with comprehensive medical records available for research purposes, seeks to explain decline in stroke mortality among older persons between 1967 and 1985. The study specifically explores the competing explanatory mechanisms of decreased incidence of stroke versus decreased case-fatality rate.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of three successive period cohorts (1967 through 1971, 1974 through 1978, and 1981 through 1985) of persons > or = 65 years of age enrolled in a large group model HMO in a metropolitan community. All new hospitalized and a sample of nonhospitalized strokes were ascertained, and samples of first-ever strokes were studied. Incidence, case-fatality rates, survival times, and comorbidities were compared across cohorts.
RESULTS: There was no significant change in stroke incidence over time; however, 1-month case fatality declined dramatically from 33% in 1967 through 1971 to 18% in 1981 through 1985 (P < .01); median survival increased from 213 to 1092 days. Indices of reduced severity included declines in coma from 27% to 12% (P < .01) and in wheelchair- or bed-bound status from 40% to 30% (P = .067). Cases with and without CT scan in 1981 to 1985, when this procedure became widely available in the health plan, were similar in severity, thereby reducing the possibility of ascertainment bias.
CONCLUSIONS: In this well-defined older population, stroke has become a less lethal and disabling though no less common disease. This finding fails to support the "compression of morbidity" hypothesis while supporting a model of delayed progression for stroke in this age group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9040676     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.28.2.284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  17 in total

Review 1.  The relationship between cholesterol and stroke: implications for antihyperlipidaemic therapy in older patients.

Authors:  C Sarti; M Kaarisalo; J Tuomilehto
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Exploring expectations for upper-extremity motor treatment in people after stroke: a secondary analysis.

Authors:  Eliza M Prager; Rebecca L Birkenmeier; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug

Review 3.  Gender differences in neurological disease: role of estrogens and cytokines.

Authors:  Anna Członkowska; Agnieszka Ciesielska; Grazyna Gromadzka; Iwona Kurkowska-Jastrzebska
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 4.  Understanding and enhancing motor recovery after stroke using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Erik H Hoyer; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 5.  Stroke liaison workers for stroke patients and carers: an individual patient data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Graham Ellis; Jonathan Mant; Peter Langhorne; Martin Dennis; Simon Winner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-05-12

6.  Can the Wolf Motor Function Test be streamlined?

Authors:  Kimberly Bogard; Steven Wolf; Qin Zhang; Paul Thompson; David Morris; Deborah Nichols-Larsen
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 3.919

7.  Ethics in public health research: changing patterns of mortality among American Indians.

Authors:  Stephen J Kunitz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 8.  Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke.

Authors:  Holm Thieme; Jan Mehrholz; Marcus Pohl; Johann Behrens; Christian Dohle
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-03-14

9.  Diagnosis and rehabilitation of visual field defects in stroke patients: a retrospective audit.

Authors:  K M Sand; L Thomassen; H Næss; E Rødahl; J M Hoff
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis Extra       Date:  2012-03-22

10.  A prospective profile of visual field loss following stroke: prevalence, type, rehabilitation, and outcome.

Authors:  Fiona J Rowe; David Wright; Darren Brand; Carole Jackson; Shirley Harrison; Tallat Maan; Claire Scott; Linda Vogwell; Sarah Peel; Nicola Akerman; Caroline Dodridge; Claire Howard; Tracey Shipman; Una Sperring; Sonia Macdiarmid; Cicely Freeman
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.