Literature DB >> 12890783

Response suppression in v1 agrees with psychophysics of surround masking.

Barbara Zenger-Landolt1, David J Heeger.   

Abstract

When a target stimulus is embedded in a high contrast surround, the target appears reduced in contrast and is harder to detect, and neural responses in visual cortex are suppressed. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and psychophysics to quantitatively compare these physiological and perceptual effects. Observers performed a contrast discrimination task on a contrast-reversing sinusoidal target grating. The target was either presented in isolation or embedded in a high-contrast surround. While observers performed the task, we also measured fMRI responses as a function of target contrast, both with and without a surround. We found that the surround substantially increased the psychophysical thresholds while reducing fMRI responses. The two data sets were compared, on the basis of the assumption that a fixed response difference is required for correct discrimination, and we found that the psychophysics accounted for 96.5% of the variance in the measured V1 responses. The suppression in visual areas V2 and V3 was stronger, too strong to agree with psychophysics. The good quantitative agreement between psychophysical thresholds and V1 responses suggests V1 as a plausible candidate for mediating surround masking.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12890783      PMCID: PMC2275204     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  86 in total

1.  Simple analytic spiral K-space algorithm.

Authors:  G H Glover
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Contrast's effect on spatial summation by macaque V1 neurons.

Authors:  M P Sceniak; D L Ringach; M J Hawken; R Shapley
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  S P Gandhi; D J Heeger; G M Boynton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4.

Authors:  J H Reynolds; L Chelazzi; R Desimone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention.

Authors:  J A Brefczynski; E A DeYoe
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Investigation of low frequency drift in fMRI signal.

Authors:  A M Smith; B K Lewis; U E Ruttimann; F Q Ye; T M Sinnwell; Y Yang; J H Duyn; J A Frank
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Neuronal basis of contrast discrimination.

Authors:  G M Boynton; J B Demb; G H Glover; D J Heeger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The retinotopy of visual spatial attention.

Authors:  R B Tootell; N Hadjikhani; E K Hall; S Marrett; W Vanduffel; J T Vaughan; A M Dale
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention.

Authors:  A Martínez; L Anllo-Vento; M I Sereno; L R Frank; R B Buxton; D J Dubowitz; E C Wong; H Hinrichs; H J Heinze; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Functional MRI reveals spatially specific attentional modulation in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  D C Somers; A M Dale; A E Seiffert; R B Tootell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  83 in total

1.  Responses of human visual cortex to uniform surfaces.

Authors:  John-Dylan Haynes; R Beau Lotto; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The clinical translation of a measure of gain control: the contrast-contrast effect task.

Authors:  Deanna M Barch; Cameron S Carter; Steve C Dakin; James Gold; Steven J Luck; Angus Macdonald; John D Ragland; Steven Silverstein; Milton E Strauss
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Local non-linear interactions in the visual cortex may reflect global decorrelation.

Authors:  Simo Vanni; Tom Rosenström
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Normalization in human somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Gijs Joost Brouwer; Vanessa Arnedo; Shani Offen; David J Heeger; Arthur C Grant
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The relationship between task performance and functional magnetic resonance imaging response.

Authors:  Giedrius T Buracas; Ione Fine; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Orientation-selective adaptation to first- and second-order patterns in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Jonas Larsson; Michael S Landy; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Separate attentional resources for vision and audition.

Authors:  David Alais; Concetta Morrone; David Burr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Uncertainty and invariance in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Bosco S Tjan; Vaia Lestou; Zoe Kourtzi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Contrast adaptation and representation in human early visual cortex.

Authors:  Justin L Gardner; Pei Sun; R Allen Waggoner; Kenichi Ueno; Keiji Tanaka; Kang Cheng
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Border ownership selectivity in human early visual cortex and its modulation by attention.

Authors:  Fang Fang; Huseyin Boyaci; Daniel Kersten
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.