Literature DB >> 19270717

Fork regression is an active helicase-driven pathway in bacteriophage T4.

David T Long1, Kenneth N Kreuzer.   

Abstract

Reactivation of stalled replication forks requires specialized mechanisms that can recognize the fork structure and promote downstream processing events. Fork regression has been implicated in several models of fork reactivation as a crucial processing step that supports repair. However, it has also been suggested that regressed forks represent pathological structures rather than physiological intermediates of repair. To investigate the biological role of fork regression in bacteriophage T4, we tested several mechanistic models of regression: strand exchange-mediated extrusion, topology-driven fork reversal and helicase-mediated extrusion. Here, we report that UvsW, a T4 branch-specific helicase, is necessary for the accumulation of regressed forks in vivo, and that UvsW-catalysed regression is the dominant mechanism of origin-fork processing that contributes to double-strand end formation. We also show that UvsW resolves purified fork intermediates in vitro by fork regression. Regression is therefore part of an active, UvsW-driven pathway of fork processing in bacteriophage T4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19270717      PMCID: PMC2672904          DOI: 10.1038/embor.2009.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO Rep        ISSN: 1469-221X            Impact factor:   8.807


  28 in total

Review 1.  Rescue of arrested replication forks by homologous recombination.

Authors:  B Michel; M J Flores; E Viguera; G Grompone; M Seigneur; V Bidnenko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  RecA protein promotes the regression of stalled replication forks in vitro.

Authors:  M E Robu; R B Inman; M M Cox
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Crystallographic and NMR analyses of UvsW and UvsW.1 from bacteriophage T4.

Authors:  Iain D Kerr; Sivashankar Sivakolundu; Zhenmei Li; Jeffrey C Buchsbaum; Luke A Knox; Richard Kriwacki; Stephen W White
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  The phage T4 protein UvsW drives Holliday junction branch migration.

Authors:  Michael R Webb; Jody L Plank; David T Long; Tao-shih Hsieh; Kenneth N Kreuzer
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Recombination-dependent DNA replication in phage T4.

Authors:  K N Kreuzer
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 13.807

6.  Regression supports two mechanisms of fork processing in phage T4.

Authors:  David T Long; Kenneth N Kreuzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Hjm/Hel308A DNA helicase from Sulfolobus tokodaii promotes replication fork regression and interacts with Hjc endonuclease in vitro.

Authors:  Zhuo Li; Shuhong Lu; Guihua Hou; Xiaoqing Ma; Duohong Sheng; Jinfeng Ni; Yulong Shen
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks.

Authors:  M Lopes; C Cotta-Ramusino; A Pellicioli; G Liberi; P Plevani; M Muzi-Falconi; C S Newlon; M Foiani
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Formation of Holliday junctions by regression of nascent DNA in intermediates containing stalled replication forks: RecG stimulates regression even when the DNA is negatively supercoiled.

Authors:  P McGlynn; R G Lloyd; K J Marians
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  ruvA and ruvB mutants specifically impaired for replication fork reversal.

Authors:  Marie Le Masson; Zeynep Baharoglu; Bénédicte Michel
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.501

View more
  20 in total

1.  Replication forks stalled at ultraviolet lesions are rescued via RecA and RuvABC protein-catalyzed disintegration in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Sharik R Khan; Andrei Kuzminov
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  DNA damage responses in prokaryotes: regulating gene expression, modulating growth patterns, and manipulating replication forks.

Authors:  Kenneth N Kreuzer
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  FANCM regulates DNA chain elongation and is stabilized by S-phase checkpoint signalling.

Authors:  Sarah Luke-Glaser; Brian Luke; Simona Grossi; Angelos Constantinou
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Substrate-selective repair and restart of replication forks by DNA translocases.

Authors:  Rémy Bétous; Frank B Couch; Aaron C Mason; Brandt F Eichman; Maria Manosas; David Cortez
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 9.423

5.  Response of the bacteriophage T4 replisome to noncoding lesions and regression of a stalled replication fork.

Authors:  Scott W Nelson; Stephen J Benkovic
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Functional analysis of DNA replication fork reversal catalyzed by Mycobacterium tuberculosis RuvAB proteins.

Authors:  Jasbeer Singh Khanduja; K Muniyappa
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Rho-dependent transcription termination is essential to prevent excessive genome-wide R-loops in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J Krishna Leela; Aisha H Syeda; K Anupama; J Gowrishankar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Interaction of T4 UvsW helicase and single-stranded DNA binding protein gp32 through its carboxy-terminal acidic tail.

Authors:  Senthil K Perumal; Scott W Nelson; Stephen J Benkovic
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Active Control of Repetitive Structural Transitions between Replication Forks and Holliday Junctions by Werner Syndrome Helicase.

Authors:  Soochul Shin; Jinwoo Lee; Sangwoon Yoo; Tomasz Kulikowicz; Vilhelm A Bohr; Byungchan Ahn; Sungchul Hohng
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  A structure-specific nucleic acid-binding domain conserved among DNA repair proteins.

Authors:  Aaron C Mason; Robert P Rambo; Briana Greer; Michael Pritchett; John A Tainer; David Cortez; Brandt F Eichman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.