Literature DB >> 18456838

Regression supports two mechanisms of fork processing in phage T4.

David T Long1, Kenneth N Kreuzer.   

Abstract

Replication forks routinely encounter damaged DNA and tightly bound proteins, leading to fork stalling and inactivation. To complete DNA synthesis, it is necessary to remove fork-blocking lesions and reactivate stalled fork structures, which can occur by multiple mechanisms. To study the mechanisms of stalled fork reactivation, we used a model fork intermediate, the origin fork, which is formed during replication from the bacteriophage T4 origin, ori(34). The origin fork accumulates within the T4 chromosome in a site-specific manner without the need for replication inhibitors or DNA damage. We report here that the origin fork is processed in vivo to generate a regressed fork structure. Furthermore, origin fork regression supports two mechanisms of fork resolution that can potentially lead to fork reactivation. Fork regression generates both a site-specific double-stranded end (DSE) and a Holliday junction. Each of these DNA elements serves as a target for processing by the T4 ATPase/exonuclease complex [gene product (gp) 46/47] and Holliday junction-cleaving enzyme (EndoVII), respectively. In the absence of both gp46 and EndoVII, regressed origin forks are stabilized and persist throughout infection. In the presence of EndoVII, but not gp46, there is significantly less regressed origin fork accumulation apparently due to cleavage of the regressed fork Holliday junction. In the presence of gp46, but not EndoVII, regressed origin fork DSEs are processed by degradation of the DSE and a pathway that includes recombination proteins. Although both mechanisms can occur independently, they may normally function together as a single fork reactivation pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18456838      PMCID: PMC2383968          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0711999105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  44 in total

1.  The gene 59 protein of bacteriophage T4. Characterization of protein-protein interactions with gene 32 protein, the T4 single-stranded DNA binding protein.

Authors:  S W Morrical; H T Beernink; A Dash; K Hempstead
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1996-08-16       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Sequence specificity and biochemical characterization of the RusA Holliday junction resolvase of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S N Chan; L Harris; E L Bolt; M C Whitby; R G Lloyd
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1997-06-06       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Characterization of an amino-terminal fragment of the bacteriophage T4 uvsY recombination protein.

Authors:  D S Yassa; K M Chou; S W Morrical
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.079

4.  Resolution of Holliday junctions by RuvC resolvase: cleavage specificity and DNA distortion.

Authors:  R J Bennett; H J Dunderdale; S C West
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-09-24       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Analysis of replication intermediates by two-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  K L Friedman; B J Brewer
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.600

6.  DNA double-strand breaks caused by replication arrest.

Authors:  B Michel; S D Ehrlich; M Uzest
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  RNA-DNA hybrid formation at a bacteriophage T4 replication origin.

Authors:  K Carles-Kinch; K N Kreuzer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Bacteriophage T4 mutants hypersensitive to an antitumor agent that induces topoisomerase-DNA cleavage complexes.

Authors:  D L Woodworth; K N Kreuzer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Recombination-dependent DNA replication stimulated by double-strand breaks in bacteriophage T4.

Authors:  K N Kreuzer; M Saunders; L J Weislo; H W Kreuzer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  RNase-sensitive DNA modification(s) initiates S. pombe mating-type switching.

Authors:  Sonya Vengrova; Jacob Z Dalgaard
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  17 in total

1.  Replication forks stalled at ultraviolet lesions are rescued via RecA and RuvABC protein-catalyzed disintegration in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Sharik R Khan; Andrei Kuzminov
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Fork regression is an active helicase-driven pathway in bacteriophage T4.

Authors:  David T Long; Kenneth N Kreuzer
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 3.  DNA damage responses in prokaryotes: regulating gene expression, modulating growth patterns, and manipulating replication forks.

Authors:  Kenneth N Kreuzer
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  Fusion of nearby inverted repeats by a replication-based mechanism leads to formation of dicentric and acentric chromosomes that cause genome instability in budding yeast.

Authors:  Andrew L Paek; Salma Kaochar; Hope Jones; Aly Elezaby; Lisa Shanks; Ted Weinert
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 5.  Replication fork reversal in eukaryotes: from dead end to dynamic response.

Authors:  Kai J Neelsen; Massimo Lopes
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 6.  Diversity and evolution of chromatin proteins encoded by DNA viruses.

Authors:  Robson F de Souza; Lakshminarayan M Iyer; L Aravind
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-10-28

7.  SRS2 and SGS1 prevent chromosomal breaks and stabilize triplet repeats by restraining recombination.

Authors:  Alix Kerrest; Ranjith P Anand; Rangapriya Sundararajan; Rodrigo Bermejo; Giordano Liberi; Bernard Dujon; Catherine H Freudenreich; Guy-Franck Richard
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2009-01-11       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 8.  Checkpoint responses to unusual structures formed by DNA repeats.

Authors:  Irina Voineagu; Catherine H Freudenreich; Sergei M Mirkin
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.784

Review 9.  Recombination and replication.

Authors:  Aisha H Syeda; Michelle Hawkins; Peter McGlynn
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 10.005

10.  Mimivirus reveals Mre11/Rad50 fusion proteins with a sporadic distribution in eukaryotes, bacteria, viruses and plasmids.

Authors:  Takashi Yoshida; Jean-Michel Claverie; Hiroyuki Ogata
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 4.099

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.