Literature DB >> 19264846

Non-response to baseline, non-response to follow-up and mortality in the Whitehall II cohort.

Jane E Ferrie1, Mika Kivimäki, Archana Singh-Manoux, Alison Shortt, Pekka Martikainen, Jenny Head, Michael Marmot, David Gimeno, Roberto De Vogli, Marko Elovainio, Martin J Shipley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the associations between non-response to follow-up surveys and mortality, or differences in these associations by socioeconomic position in studies with repeat data collections.
METHODS: The Whitehall II study of socioeconomic inequalities in health provided response status from five data collection surveys; Phase 1 (1985-88, n = 10 308), Phase 5 (1997-99, n = 6533), and all-cause mortality to 2006. Odd-numbered phases included a medical examination in addition to a questionnaire.
RESULTS: Non-response to baseline and to follow-up phases that included a medical examination was associated with a doubling of the mortality hazard in analyses adjusted for age and sex. Compared with complete responders, responders who missed one or more phases, but completed the last possible phase before they died, had a 38% excess risk of mortality. However, those who missed one or more phases including the last possible phase before death had an excess risk of 127%. There was no evidence that these associations differed by socioeconomic position.
CONCLUSION: In studies with repeat data collections, non-response to follow-up is associated with the same doubling of the mortality risk as non-response to baseline; an association that is not modified by socioeconomic position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19264846      PMCID: PMC2722814          DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyp153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  33 in total

1.  A longitudinal study of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  O PAUL; M H LEPPER; W H PHELAN; G W DUPERTUIS; A MACMILLAN; H McKEAN; H PARK
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  A comparison between participants and non-participants in a primary preventive trial.

Authors:  L Wilhelmsen; S Ljungberg; H Wedel; L Werkö
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1976-05

3.  Response bias in the Honolulu Heart Program.

Authors:  R Benfante; D Reed; C MacLean; A Kagan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Long-term outcome of the Malmö preventive project: mortality and cardiovascular morbidity.

Authors:  G Berglund; P Nilsson; K F Eriksson; J A Nilsson; B Hedblad; H Kristenson; F Lindgärde
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  The effects of nonresponse in a prospective study of cancer.

Authors:  L K Heilbrun; A Nomura; G N Stemmermann
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Survey non-response in the Netherlands: effects on prevalence estimates and associations.

Authors:  A Jeanne M Van Loon; Marja Tijhuis; H Susan J Picavet; Paul G Surtees; Johan Ormel
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.797

7.  The effects of non-response in a prospective study of cancer: 15-year follow-up.

Authors:  L K Heilbrun; A Nomura; G N Stemmermann
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 7.196

8.  The population study of women in Gothenburg 1980-81--the third phase of a longitudinal study. Comparison between participants and non-participants.

Authors:  C Bengtsson; T Gredmark; L Hallberg; T Hällström; B Isaksson; L Lapidus; O Lindquist; S Lindstedt; M Lurie; E Nyström
Journal:  Scand J Soc Med       Date:  1989

9.  Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study.

Authors:  M G Marmot; G D Smith; S Stansfeld; C Patel; F North; J Head; I White; E Brunner; A Feeney
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-06-08       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Adolescent survey non-response and later risk of death. A prospective cohort study of 78,609 persons with 11-year follow-up.

Authors:  Ville M Mattila; Jari Parkkari; Arja Rimpelä
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  33 in total

1.  Long working hours and symptoms of anxiety and depression: a 5-year follow-up of the Whitehall II study.

Authors:  M Virtanen; J E Ferrie; A Singh-Manoux; M J Shipley; S A Stansfeld; M G Marmot; K Ahola; J Vahtera; M Kivimäki
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 7.723

2.  Mortality among participants and non-participants in a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Signe Benzon Larsen; Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton; Joachim Schüz; Jane Christensen; Kim Overvad; Anne Tjønneland; Christoffer Johansen; Anja Olsen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Educational inequalities in mortality by cause of death: first national data for the Netherlands.

Authors:  Ivana Kulhánová; Rasmus Hoffmann; Terje A Eikemo; Gwenn Menvielle; Johan P Mackenbach
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  Conflicts between work and family life and subsequent sleep problems among employees from Finland, Britain, and Japan.

Authors:  T Lallukka; J E Ferrie; M Kivimäki; M J Shipley; M Sekine; T Tatsuse; O Pietiläinen; O Rahkonen; M G Marmot; E Lahelma
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2014-04

5.  Job insecurity and incident coronary heart disease: the Whitehall II prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jane E Ferrie; Mika Kivimäki; Martin J Shipley; George Davey Smith; Marianna Virtanen
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 5.162

6.  Social inequality in walking speed in early old age in the Whitehall II study.

Authors:  Eric Brunner; Martin Shipley; Victoria Spencer; Mika Kivimaki; Tarani Chandola; David Gimeno; Archana Singh-Manoux; Jack Guralnik; Michael Marmot
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 6.053

7.  Work-family conflicts and health behaviors among British, Finnish, and Japanese employees.

Authors:  T Lallukka; T Chandola; E Roos; N Cable; M Sekine; S Kagamimori; T Tatsuse; M Marmot; E Lahelma
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2010-06

8.  Changes Over Time in Absolute and Relative Socioeconomic Differences in Smoking: A Comparison of Cohort Studies From Britain, Finland, and Japan.

Authors:  Eero Lahelma; Olli Pietiläinen; Jane Ferrie; Mika Kivimäki; Jouni Lahti; Michael Marmot; Ossi Rahkonen; Michikazu Sekine; Martin Shipley; Takashi Tatsuse; Tea Lallukka
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 4.244

9.  Survival advantage of cohort participation attenuates over time: results from three long-standing community-based studies.

Authors:  Zihe Zheng; Casey M Rebholz; Kunihiro Matsushita; Judith Hoffman-Bolton; Michael J Blaha; Elizabeth Selvin; Lisa Wruck; A Richey Sharrett; Josef Coresh
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 3.797

10.  Socioeconomic and ethnic differences in use of lipid-lowering drugs after deregulation of simvastatin in the UK: the Whitehall II prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ian Forde; Tarani Chandola; Rosalind Raine; Michael G Marmot; Mika Kivimaki
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 5.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.