Literature DB >> 7114044

The effects of nonresponse in a prospective study of cancer.

L K Heilbrun, A Nomura, G N Stemmermann.   

Abstract

Out of 11,136 Japanese men identified on the island of Oahu, Hawaii, in 1965 by the Honolulu Heart Program, 8006 responded to a mailed questionnaire and were examined, 1871 only responded to the mailed questionnaire, and 1259 did not respond at all. After 10 years of follow-up, the examined men had a significantly lower risk of death from all causes, death from cancer, and incidence of stomach cancer than the unexamined men. Minimal differences were also noted between the two groups in the time interval between the beginning of follow-up and the diagnosis of cancer of the lung and large bowel, and these favored the examined men. The examined men had a higher risk of prostate cancer incidence, although not significantly so. When the 8006 examined and 1871 unexamined men who responded to the mailed questionnaire were evaluated with respect to the association of cigarette smoking with lung cancer incidence, the odds ratio estimate for smokers was 19 for the examined men and 7 for the unexamined men. However, since these odds ratios are not significantly different, there would be little bias in odds ratio estimates of cigarette smoking for lung cancer if the observation was limited to examined men. With regard to the association of low education with stomach cancer, the odds ratio estimates were nearly identical as 1.2 for the examined group and 1.1 for the unexamined group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7114044     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  13 in total

1.  A comparison of elderly participants in a community survey with nonparticipants.

Authors:  M M Adams; P A Scherr; L G Branch; L E Hebert; N R Cook; A M Lane; D B Brock; D A Evans; J O Taylor
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 2.  Smoking and selected DNA repair gene polymorphisms in controls: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Elizabeth Hodgson; Charles Poole; Andrew F Olshan; Kari E North; Donglin Zeng; Robert C Millikan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Selection bias in population-based cancer case-control studies due to incomplete sampling frame coverage.

Authors:  Matthew C Walsh; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Ronald E Gangnon; F Javier Nieto; Polly A Newcomb; Mari Palta
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Non-response to baseline, non-response to follow-up and mortality in the Whitehall II cohort.

Authors:  Jane E Ferrie; Mika Kivimäki; Archana Singh-Manoux; Alison Shortt; Pekka Martikainen; Jenny Head; Michael Marmot; David Gimeno; Roberto De Vogli; Marko Elovainio; Martin J Shipley
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Survival advantage of cohort participation attenuates over time: results from three long-standing community-based studies.

Authors:  Zihe Zheng; Casey M Rebholz; Kunihiro Matsushita; Judith Hoffman-Bolton; Michael J Blaha; Elizabeth Selvin; Lisa Wruck; A Richey Sharrett; Josef Coresh
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 3.797

6.  Maternal serum concentrations of perfluoroalkyl substances during pregnancy and gestational weight gain: The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children.

Authors:  Kristin J Marks; Zuha Jeddy; W Dana Flanders; Kate Northstone; Abigail Fraser; Antonia M Calafat; Kayoko Kato; Terryl J Hartman
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 3.143

7.  Maternal serum concentrations of perfluoroalkyl substances and birth size in British boys.

Authors:  Kristin J Marks; Anya J Cutler; Zuha Jeddy; Kate Northstone; Kayoko Kato; Terryl J Hartman
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 5.840

8.  Prenatal exposure to mixtures of persistent endocrine disrupting chemicals and early menarche in a population-based cohort of British girls.

Authors:  Kristin J Marks; Penelope P Howards; Melissa M Smarr; W Dana Flanders; Kate Northstone; Johnni H Daniel; Antonia M Calafat; Andreas Sjödin; Michele Marcus; Terryl J Hartman
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 8.071

9.  Loss to follow-up in cohort studies: bias in estimates of socioeconomic inequalities.

Authors:  Laura D Howe; Kate Tilling; Bruna Galobardes; Debbie A Lawlor
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  The Oslo Health Study: The impact of self-selection in a large, population-based survey.

Authors:  Anne Johanne Søgaard; Randi Selmer; Espen Bjertness; Dag Thelle
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2004-05-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.