Literature DB >> 12559669

Survey non-response in the Netherlands: effects on prevalence estimates and associations.

A Jeanne M Van Loon1, Marja Tijhuis, H Susan J Picavet, Paul G Surtees, Johan Ormel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Differences in respondent characteristics may lead to bias in prevalence estimates and bias in associations. Both forms of non-response bias are investigated in a study on psychosocial factors and cancer risk, which is a sub-study of a large-scale monitoring survey in the Netherlands.
METHODS: Respondents of a cross-sectional monitoring project (MORGEN; N = 22,769) were also asked to participate in a prospective study on psychosocial factors and cancer risk (HLEQ; N = 12,097). To investigate diverse aspects of non-response in the HLEQ on prevalence estimates and associations are studied, based on information gathered in the MORGEN-project.
RESULTS: A response percentage of 45% was obtained in the MORGEN-project. Response rates were found to be lower among men and younger people. The HLEQ showed a response percentage of 56%, and respondents reported higher socioeconomic status, better subjective health and healthier lifestyle behaviors than non-respondents. However, associations between smoking status and either socioeconomic status or subjective health based on respondents only were not statistically different from those based on the entire MORGEN-population.
CONCLUSION: Non-response leads to bias in prevalence estimates of current smoking, current alcohol intake, and low physical activity or poor subjective health. However, non-response did not cause bias in the examined associations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12559669     DOI: 10.1016/s1047-2797(02)00257-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  134 in total

1.  Estimating non-response bias in family studies: application to mental health and lifestyle.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Vink; Gonneke Willemsen; Janine H Stubbe; Christel M Middeldorp; Rozemarijn S L Ligthart; Kim D Baas; Hanneke J C Dirkzwager; Eco J C de Geus; Dorret I Boomsma
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Mental health impact of the 2010 Haiti earthquake on the Miami Haitian population: A random-sample survey.

Authors:  Antoine Messiah; Juan M Acuna; Grettel Castro; Pura Rodríguez de la Vega; Guillaume Vaiva; James Shultz; Yuval Neria; Mario De La Rosa
Journal:  Disaster Health       Date:  2015-02-18

3.  Response rates and response bias for 50 surveys of pediatricians.

Authors:  William L Cull; Karen G O'Connor; Sanford Sharp; Suk-fong S Tang
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Difference in Effectiveness of Medication Adherence Intervention by Health Literacy Level.

Authors:  Ashli A Owen-Smith; David H Smith; Cynthia S Rand; Jeffrey O Tom; Reesa Laws; Amy Waterbury; Andrew Williams; William M Vollmer
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2016-06-29

5.  Features associated with the non-participation and drop out by socially-at-risk children and adolescents in mental-health epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Rosario Granero Pérez; Lourdes Ezpeleta; José María Domenech
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 4.328

6.  Investigation of relative risk estimates from studies of the same population with contrasting response rates and designs.

Authors:  Nicole M Mealing; Emily Banks; Louisa R Jorm; David G Steel; Mark S Clements; Kris D Rogers
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Differentiating positive and negative self-rated health: results from a cross-sectional study in Estonia.

Authors:  Rainer Reile; Mall Leinsalu
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.380

8.  Factor structure of measures of anxiety and depression symptoms in African American youth.

Authors:  Ruth C Brown; Ilya Yaroslavsky; Alexis M Quinoy; Allan D Friedman; Richard R Brookman; Michael A Southam-Gerow
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2013-08

9.  Did Finland's Tobacco Control Act of 1976 have an impact on ever smoking? An examination based on male and female cohort trends.

Authors:  S Helakorpi; T Martelin; J Torppa; K Patja; E Vartiainen; A Uutela
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Correlates of objectively measured physical activity in adults and older people: a cross-sectional study of population-based sample of adults and older people living in Norway.

Authors:  Bjørge Herman Hansen; Yngvar Ommundsen; Ingar Holme; Elin Kolle; Sigmund Alfred Anderssen
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 3.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.