Eero Lahelma1, Olli Pietiläinen2, Jane Ferrie3, Mika Kivimäki4, Jouni Lahti2, Michael Marmot5, Ossi Rahkonen2, Michikazu Sekine6, Martin Shipley5, Takashi Tatsuse6, Tea Lallukka7. 1. Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; eero.lahelma@helsinki.fi. 2. Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; 3. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK; School of Community and Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; 4. Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK; Centre of Expertise for Development of Work and Organizations, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland; 5. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK; 6. Department of Epidemiology and Health Policy, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan. 7. Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Centre of Expertise for Development of Work and Organizations, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland;
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Socioeconomic differences in smoking over time and across national contexts are poorly understood. We assessed the magnitude of relative and absolute social class differences in smoking in cohorts from Britain, Finland, and Japan over 5-7 years. METHODS: The British Whitehall II study (n = 4350), Finnish Helsinki Health Study (n = 6328), and Japanese Civil Servants Study (n = 1993) all included employed men and women aged 35-68 at baseline in 1997-2002. Follow-up was in 2003-2007 (mean follow-up 5.1, 6.5, and 3.6 years, respectively). Occupational social class (managers, professionals and clerical employees) was measured at baseline. Current smoking and covariates (age, marital status, body mass index, and self-rated health) were measured at baseline and follow-up. We assessed relative social class differences using the Relative Index of Inequality and absolute differences using the Slope Index of Inequality. RESULTS: Social class differences in smoking were found in Britain and Finland, but not in Japan. Age-adjusted relative differences at baseline ranged from Relative Index of Inequality 3.08 (95% confidence interval 1.99-4.78) among Finnish men to 2.32 (1.24-4.32) among British women, with differences at follow-up greater by 8%-58%. Absolute differences remained stable and varied from Slope Index of Inequality 0.27 (0.15-0.40) among Finnish men to 0.10 (0.03-0.16) among British women. Further adjustment for covariates had modest effects on inequality indices. CONCLUSIONS: Large social class differences in smoking persisted among British and Finnish men and women, with widening tendencies in relative differences over time. No differences could be confirmed among Japanese men or women. IMPLICATIONS: Changes over time in social class differences in smoking are poorly understood across countries. Our study focused on employees from Britain, Finland and Japan, and found relative and absolute and class differences among British and Finnish men and women. Key covariates had modest effects on the differences. Relative differences tended to widen over the 4- to 7-year follow-up, whereas absolute differences remained stable. In contrast, class differences in smoking among Japanese men or women were not found. Britain and Finland are at the late stage of the smoking epidemic model, whereas Japan may not follow the same model.
INTRODUCTION: Socioeconomic differences in smoking over time and across national contexts are poorly understood. We assessed the magnitude of relative and absolute social class differences in smoking in cohorts from Britain, Finland, and Japan over 5-7 years. METHODS: The British Whitehall II study (n = 4350), Finnish Helsinki Health Study (n = 6328), and Japanese Civil Servants Study (n = 1993) all included employed men and women aged 35-68 at baseline in 1997-2002. Follow-up was in 2003-2007 (mean follow-up 5.1, 6.5, and 3.6 years, respectively). Occupational social class (managers, professionals and clerical employees) was measured at baseline. Current smoking and covariates (age, marital status, body mass index, and self-rated health) were measured at baseline and follow-up. We assessed relative social class differences using the Relative Index of Inequality and absolute differences using the Slope Index of Inequality. RESULTS: Social class differences in smoking were found in Britain and Finland, but not in Japan. Age-adjusted relative differences at baseline ranged from Relative Index of Inequality 3.08 (95% confidence interval 1.99-4.78) among Finnish men to 2.32 (1.24-4.32) among British women, with differences at follow-up greater by 8%-58%. Absolute differences remained stable and varied from Slope Index of Inequality 0.27 (0.15-0.40) among Finnish men to 0.10 (0.03-0.16) among British women. Further adjustment for covariates had modest effects on inequality indices. CONCLUSIONS: Large social class differences in smoking persisted among British and Finnish men and women, with widening tendencies in relative differences over time. No differences could be confirmed among Japanese men or women. IMPLICATIONS: Changes over time in social class differences in smoking are poorly understood across countries. Our study focused on employees from Britain, Finland and Japan, and found relative and absolute and class differences among British and Finnish men and women. Key covariates had modest effects on the differences. Relative differences tended to widen over the 4- to 7-year follow-up, whereas absolute differences remained stable. In contrast, class differences in smoking among Japanese men or women were not found. Britain and Finland are at the late stage of the smoking epidemic model, whereas Japan may not follow the same model.
Authors: Jane E Ferrie; Mika Kivimäki; Archana Singh-Manoux; Alison Shortt; Pekka Martikainen; Jenny Head; Michael Marmot; David Gimeno; Roberto De Vogli; Marko Elovainio; Martin J Shipley Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2009-03-05 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Tea Lallukka; Eero Lahelma; Ossi Rahkonen; Eva Roos; Elina Laaksonen; Pekka Martikainen; Jenny Head; Eric Brunner; Annhild Mosdol; Michael Marmot; Michikazu Sekine; Ali Nasermoaddeli; Sadanobu Kagamimori Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2008-02-08 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: M G Marmot; G D Smith; S Stansfeld; C Patel; F North; J Head; I White; E Brunner; A Feeney Journal: Lancet Date: 1991-06-08 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Isabel Aguilar-Palacio; Ana Isabel Gil-Lacruz; Raquel Sánchez-Recio; Mª José Rabanaque Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2018-01-30 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Shervin Assari; James L Smith; Marc A Zimmerman; Mohsen Bazargan Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-04-04 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Somtip Watanapongvanich; Mostafa Saidur Rahim Khan; Pongpat Putthinun; Shunsuke Ono; Yoshihiko Kadoya Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-01-15
Authors: Otto Ruokolainen; Hanna Ollila; Kristiina Patja; Katja Borodulin; Tiina Laatikainen; Tellervo Korhonen Journal: Nordisk Alkohol Nark Date: 2018-04-19