| Literature DB >> 19259662 |
Hein J Verberne1, G Aernout Somsen, Pavol Povinec, Berthe L F van Eck-Smit, Arnold F Jacobson.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In planar (123)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine ((123)I-MIBG) myocardial imaging mediastinum (M) activity is often used as a background correction in calculating "washout" (WO). However, the most likely sources for counts that might produce errors in estimating myocardial (Myo) activity are lung (Lu) and liver (Li), which typically have higher counts/pixel (cpp) than M. The present study investigated the relationship between changes in Lu, Li and Myo activity between early and late planar (123)I-MIBG images, with comparison to M as the best estimator of non-specific background activity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19259662 PMCID: PMC2709219 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-009-1093-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ISSN: 1619-7070 Impact factor: 9.236
Fig. 1Example of processing procedure for late planar 123I-MIBG images. The positioning of the mediastinal ROI was standardized in relation to the lung apex, the lower boundary of the upper mediastinum and the midline between the lungs
Patient parameters for all subjects and subdivided by patient subgroup
| Patient characteristics | All ( | Patient subgroup | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHF | HTN | Controls | ||
| ( | ( | ( | ||
| Male/femalea | 74/24 | 57/11 | 7/7 | 10/6 |
| Age (years)b | 52.8 ± 13.0 (range 22–83) | 56.6 ± 11.1 | 42.9 ± 13.9 | 44.9 ± 12.3 |
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
CHF subjects with chronic heart failure, HTN subjects with hypertension
aGender: p = 0.02 for CHF vs HTN; p = 0.205 for CHF vs controls; p = 0.826 for HTN vs controls
bAge: p < 0.001 for CHF vs HTN; p = 0.002 for CHF vs controls; p = 0.735 for HTN vs controls
Myocardial, mediastinal, lung and liver 123I-MIBG washout
| Myocardial washouta | Mediastinal washout | Lung washout | Liver washoutb | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98 | 22.50 (9.35) | 17.10 (9.31) | 29.20 (10.78) | 9.09 (21.49) |
| CHF | 68 | 25.20 (8.24) | 16.50 (10.00) | 28.74 (11.65) | 5.56 (22.30) |
| HTN | 14 | 14.92 (7.08) | 18.27 (8.25) | 27.44 (6.88) | 9.73 (13.58) |
| Controls | 16 | 17.65 (10.34) | 18.64 (7.10) | 32.73 (9.33) | 23.56 (18.02) |
aMyocardial washout: p = 0.005 for CHF vs controls and p < 0.001 for CHF vs HTN
bLiver washout: p = 0.007 for CHF vs controls
Multivariable analysis of mediastinal, lung and liver 123I-MIBG washout as predictors of 123I-MIBG myocardial washout for all subjects (n = 98)
| Variables | Coefficient | Standard error | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 7.546 | 2.171 | |
| Mediastinal washout | 0.255 | 0.111 | 0.023 |
| Lung washout | 0.531 | 0.087 | < 0.001 |
| Goodness-of-fit of the model | Adjusted | ||
| 0.372 | < 0.001 |
Multivariable analysis of mediastinal, lung and liver 123I-MIBG washout as predictors of 123I-MIBG myocardial washout for chronic heart failure subjects (n = 68)
| Variables | Coefficient | Standard error | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 10.416 | 1.710 | |
| Mediastinal washout | 0.263 | 0.095 | 0.007 |
| Lung washout | 0.364 | 0.081 | < 0.001 |
| Goodness-of-fit of the model | Adjusted | ||
| 0.595 | < 0.001 |
Multivariable analysis of mediastinal, lung and liver 123I-MIBG washout as predictors of 123I-MIBG myocardial washout in subjects with hypertension (n = 14)
| Variables | Coefficient | Standard error | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | −3.743 | 3.922 | |
| Liver washout | 0.296 | 0.073 | 0.002 |
| Lung washout | 0.575 | 0.143 | 0.002 |
| Goodness-of-fit of the model | Adjusted | ||
| 0.764 | < 0.001 |
Multivariable analysis of mediastinal, lung and liver 123I-MIBG washout as predictors of 123I-MIBG myocardial washout for controls (n = 16)
| Variables | Coefficient | Standard error | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 2.334 | 6.380 | |
| Mediastinal washout | 0.822 | 0.321 | 0.023 |
| Goodness-of-fit of the model | Adjusted | ||
| 0.270 | 0.023 |