BACKGROUND: Iodine 123 metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) imaging and heart rate variability (HRV) analysis were compared in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) who did and did not receive defibrillator discharges. Although the ICD has been shown to abort potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmias, identification of patients who most benefit from this device remains difficult. As the autonomic nervous system has been implicated in the genesis of these arrhythmias, we undertook a pilot study to evaluate local myocardial sympathetic innervation with the use of I-123 MIBG myocardial imaging, as well as central autonomic tone with the use of HRV, in patients with implantable defibrillators. Test results were correlated with the occurrence of ICD discharges. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventeen patients with previously implanted defibrillators were studied. Of these, 10 had at least 1 appropriate device discharge for ventricular tachyarrhythmias, whereas 7 had no discharge. Patients with a discharge had a significantly lower I-123 MIBG heart-mediastinal tracer uptake ratio, higher I-123 MIBG defect scores, more extensive sympathetic denervation, and significantly reduced values for several HRV parameters, particularly those in the frequency domain. When combined, the I-123 MIBG heart-mediastinal ratio and HRV 5-minute low-frequency variables were highly predictive of defibrillator discharges. All patients with a heart-mediastinal ratio lower than 1.54 and 5-minute low frequency lower than 443 ms(2) had an ICD discharge (4/4), whereas no patient with an uptake ratio greater than 1.54 and 5-minute low frequency greater than 443 ms(2) did (0/3, P =.03). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac autonomic assessment using a combination of myocardial scintigraphic and neurophysiologic techniques may help select patients who would most benefit from an implantable defibrillator by identifying those at increased risk for potentially fatal arrhythmias.
BACKGROUND:Iodine 123 metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) imaging and heart rate variability (HRV) analysis were compared in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) who did and did not receive defibrillator discharges. Although the ICD has been shown to abort potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmias, identification of patients who most benefit from this device remains difficult. As the autonomic nervous system has been implicated in the genesis of these arrhythmias, we undertook a pilot study to evaluate local myocardial sympathetic innervation with the use of I-123 MIBG myocardial imaging, as well as central autonomic tone with the use of HRV, in patients with implantable defibrillators. Test results were correlated with the occurrence of ICD discharges. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventeen patients with previously implanted defibrillators were studied. Of these, 10 had at least 1 appropriate device discharge for ventricular tachyarrhythmias, whereas 7 had no discharge. Patients with a discharge had a significantly lower I-123 MIBG heart-mediastinal tracer uptake ratio, higher I-123 MIBG defect scores, more extensive sympathetic denervation, and significantly reduced values for several HRV parameters, particularly those in the frequency domain. When combined, the I-123 MIBG heart-mediastinal ratio and HRV 5-minute low-frequency variables were highly predictive of defibrillator discharges. All patients with a heart-mediastinal ratio lower than 1.54 and 5-minute low frequency lower than 443 ms(2) had an ICD discharge (4/4), whereas no patient with an uptake ratio greater than 1.54 and 5-minute low frequency greater than 443 ms(2) did (0/3, P =.03). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac autonomic assessment using a combination of myocardial scintigraphic and neurophysiologic techniques may help select patients who would most benefit from an implantable defibrillator by identifying those at increased risk for potentially fatal arrhythmias.
Authors: P Merlet; C Benvenuti; D Moyse; F Pouillart; J L Dubois-Randé; A M Duval; D Loisance; A Castaigne; A Syrota Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Arthur J Moss; Wojciech Zareba; W Jackson Hall; Helmut Klein; David J Wilber; David S Cannom; James P Daubert; Steven L Higgins; Mary W Brown; Mark L Andrews Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-03-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: G Gioia; B Bagheri; C D Gottlieb; D S Schwartzman; D J Callans; F E Marchlinski; J Heo; A E Iskandrian Journal: Circulation Date: 1997-01-21 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: T Toyama; Y Aihara; T Iwasaki; A Hasegawa; T Suzuki; R Nagai; K Endo; H Hoshizaki; S Oshima; K Taniguchi Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: S N Singh; R D Fletcher; S G Fisher; B N Singh; H D Lewis; P C Deedwania; B M Massie; C Colling; D Lazzeri Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1995-07-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Maureen M Henneman; Frank M Bengel; Ernst E van der Wall; Juhani Knuuti; Jeroen J Bax Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2008-04-16 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Hein J Verberne; G Aernout Somsen; Pavol Povinec; Berthe L F van Eck-Smit; Arnold F Jacobson Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-03-04 Impact factor: 9.236