Literature DB >> 19259127

Personal genomics services: whose genomes?

David Gurwitz1, Yael Bregman-Eschet.   

Abstract

New companies offering personal whole-genome information services over the internet are dynamic and highly visible players in the personal genomics field. For fees currently ranging from US$399 to US$2500 and a vial of saliva, individuals can now purchase online access to their individual genetic information regarding susceptibility to a range of chronic diseases and phenotypic traits based on a genome-wide SNP scan. Most of the companies offering such services are based in the United States, but their clients may come from nearly anywhere in the world. Although the scientific validity, clinical utility and potential future implications of such services are being hotly debated, several ethical and regulatory questions related to direct-to-consumer (DTC) marketing strategies of genetic tests have not yet received sufficient attention. For example, how can we minimize the risk of unauthorized third parties from submitting other people's DNA for testing? Another pressing question concerns the ownership of (genotypic and phenotypic) information, as well as the unclear legal status of customers regarding their own personal information. Current legislation in the US and Europe falls short of providing clear answers to these questions. Until the regulation of personal genomics services catches up with the technology, we call upon commercial providers to self-regulate and coordinate their activities to minimize potential risks to individual privacy. We also point out some specific steps, along the trustee model, that providers of DTC personal genomics services as well as regulators and policy makers could consider for addressing some of the concerns raised below.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19259127      PMCID: PMC2986500          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  23 in total

1.  The charitable trust as a model for genomic biobanks.

Authors:  David E Winickoff; Richard N Winickoff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Healthy competition: What's holding back health care and how to free it.

Authors:  Michael F Cannon; Michael Tanner
Journal:  AHIP Cover       Date:  2006 May-Jun

3.  Breakthrough of the year. It's all about me.

Authors:  Jocelyn Kaiser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Genomics: the personal side of genomics.

Authors:  Nathan Blow
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Genetic nondiscrimination legislation: a critical prerequisite for pharmacogenomics data sharing.

Authors:  Russ B Altman; Neal Benowitz; David Gurwitz; Jeantine Lunshof; Mary Relling; Jatinder Lamba; Eric Wieben; Sean Mooney; Kathleen Giacomini; Scott Weiss; Julie A Johnson; Howard McLeod; David Flockhart; Richard Weinshilboum; Alan R Shuldiner; Dan Roden; Ronald M Krauss; Mark Ratain
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.533

6.  Letting the genome out of the bottle--will we get our wish?

Authors:  David J Hunter; Muin J Khoury; Jeffrey M Drazen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Personal genomes: Misdirected precaution.

Authors:  Barbara Prainsack; Jenny Reardon; Richard Hindmarsh; Herbert Gottweis; Ursula Naue; Jeantine E Lunshof
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Cystic fibrosis prenatal screening in genetic counseling practice: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Elinor Langfelder-Schwind; Edward Kloza; Elaine Sugarman; Barbara Pettersen; Trisha Brown; Kim Jensen; Seth Marcus; Joy Redman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Genetic influences on female infidelity and number of sexual partners in humans: a linkage and association study of the role of the vasopressin receptor gene (AVPR1A).

Authors:  Lynn F Cherkas; Elizabeth C Oelsner; Y T Mak; Anna Valdes; Tim D Spector
Journal:  Twin Res       Date:  2004-12

Review 10.  Risk assessment and genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Janice L Berliner; Angela Musial Fay
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 2.717

View more
  17 in total

1.  Neither as harmful as feared by critics nor as empowering as promised by providers: risk information offered direct to consumer by personal genomics companies.

Authors:  Anders Nordgren
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-04-05

Review 2.  Personal genetics: regulatory framework in Europe from a service provider's perspective.

Authors:  Keith A Grimaldi; Markus P Look; G Antonio Scioli; Juan Coll Clavero; Stathis Marinos; Tassos Tagaris
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Perception of direct-to-consumer genetic testing and direct-to-consumer advertising of genetic tests among members of a large managed care organization.

Authors:  Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Nicole Wagner; Anh Quynh Le; Eve Halterman; Nadine Cornish; James W Dearing
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Direct to consumer genetic tests.

Authors:  Christine Patch; Jorge Sequeiros; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Challenges of incorporating pharmacogenomics into clinical practice.

Authors:  Sharon Marsh; Tibor van Rooij
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09

6.  Evaluation of genetic tests for susceptibility to common complex diseases: why, when and how?

Authors:  Caroline Fiona Wright; Mark Kroese
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Participation in genetic testing research varies by social group.

Authors:  Sharon Hensley Alford; Colleen M McBride; Robert J Reid; Eric B Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Awareness, attitudes and perspectives of direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Greece: a survey of potential consumers.

Authors:  Vasiliki Mavroidopoulou; Ellie Xera; Vasiliki Mollaki
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 9.  Direct-to-consumer personalized genomic testing.

Authors:  Cinnamon S Bloss; Burcu F Darst; Eric J Topol; Nicholas J Schork
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 10.  Genetic testing and common disorders in a public health framework: how to assess relevance and possibilities. Background Document to the ESHG recommendations on genetic testing and common disorders.

Authors:  Frauke Becker; Carla G van El; Dolores Ibarreta; Eleni Zika; Stuart Hogarth; Pascal Borry; Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Jean Jacques Cassiman; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Shirley Hodgson; A Cécile J W Janssens; Helena Kaariainen; Michael Krawczak; Ulf Kristoffersson; Jan Lubinski; Christine Patch; Victor B Penchaszadeh; Andrew Read; Wolf Rogowski; Jorge Sequeiros; Lisbeth Tranebjaerg; Irene M van Langen; Helen Wallace; Ron Zimmern; Jörg Schmidtke; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.