Literature DB >> 19936793

Evaluation of genetic tests for susceptibility to common complex diseases: why, when and how?

Caroline Fiona Wright1, Mark Kroese.   

Abstract

Recent research into the human genome has generated a wealth of scientific knowledge and increased both public and professional interest in the concept of personalised medicine. Somewhat unexpectedly, in addition to increasing our understanding about the genetic basis for numerous diseases, these new discoveries have also spawned a burgeoning new industry of 'consumer genetic testing'. In this paper, we present the principles learnt though the evaluation of tests for single gene disorders and suggest a comparable framework for the evaluation of genetic tests for susceptibility to common complex diseases. Both physicians and the general public will need to be able to assess the claims made by providers of genetic testing services, and ultimately policy-makers will need to decide if and when such tests should be offered through state funded healthcare systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19936793     DOI: 10.1007/s00439-009-0767-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  60 in total

1.  The use of meta-analysis risk estimates for candidate genes in combination to predict coronary heart disease risk.

Authors:  F Drenos; J C Whittaker; S E Humphries
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 1.670

2.  Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits.

Authors:  Lucia A Hindorff; Praveen Sethupathy; Heather A Junkins; Erin M Ramos; Jayashri P Mehta; Francis S Collins; Teri A Manolio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Testing challenges: evaluation of novel diagnostics and molecular biomarkers.

Authors:  Ronald L Zimmern
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 4.  The current landscape for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: legal, ethical, and policy issues.

Authors:  Stuart Hogarth; Gail Javitt; David Melzer
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 8.929

5.  An agenda for personalized medicine.

Authors:  Pauline C Ng; Sarah S Murray; Samuel Levy; J Craig Venter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  An updated coronary risk profile. A statement for health professionals.

Authors:  K M Anderson; P W Wilson; P M Odell; W B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  The genomic applications in practice and prevention network.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; W Gregory Feero; Michele Reyes; Toby Citrin; Andrew Freedman; Debra Leonard; Wylie Burke; Ralph Coates; Robert T Croyle; Karen Edwards; Sharon Kardia; Colleen McBride; Teri Manolio; Gurvaneet Randhawa; Rebekah Rasooly; Jeannette St Pierre; Sharon Terry
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 9.  Comparative effectiveness research and genomic medicine: an evolving partnership for 21st century medicine.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; Eugene C Rich; Gurvaneet Randhawa; Steven M Teutsch; John Niederhuber
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Direct to consumer genetic testing: Avoiding a culture war.

Authors:  James P Evans; Robert C Green
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  13 in total

1.  Consent to 'personal' genomics and privacy. Direct-to-consumer genetic tests and population genome research challenge traditional notions of privacy and consent.

Authors:  Bartha Maria Knoppers
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 2.  Personal genetics: regulatory framework in Europe from a service provider's perspective.

Authors:  Keith A Grimaldi; Markus P Look; G Antonio Scioli; Juan Coll Clavero; Stathis Marinos; Tassos Tagaris
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Receptiveness to participation in genetic research: A pilot study comparing views of people with depression, diabetes, or no illness.

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts; Jane Paik Kim
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.791

4.  Interest, rationale, and potential clinical applications of genetic testing for mood disorders: a survey of stakeholders.

Authors:  Jessica A Erickson; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 4.839

5.  A Qualitative Study of Anticipated Decision Making around Type 2 Diabetes Genetic Testing: the Role of Scientifically Concordant and Discordant Expectations.

Authors:  Alicia G Carmichael; Bailey B Hulswit; Emily J Moe; Toby Epstein Jayaratne; Beverly M Yashar
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Individual and cumulative effects of GWAS susceptibility loci in lung cancer: associations after sub-phenotyping for COPD.

Authors:  Robert P Young; Raewyn J Hopkins; Chris F Whittington; Bryan A Hay; Michael J Epton; Gregory D Gamble
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Personalised medicine in Canada: a survey of adoption and practice in oncology, cardiology and family medicine.

Authors:  Katherine Bonter; Clarissa Desjardins; Nathan Currier; Jason Pun; Fredrick D Ashbury
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Genetic evidence linking lung cancer and COPD: a new perspective.

Authors:  Robert P Young; Raewyn J Hopkins; Gregory D Gamble; Carol Etzel; Randa El-Zein; James D Crapo
Journal:  Appl Clin Genet       Date:  2011-07-18

9.  Personalized medicine in cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Moo-Sik Lee; Andreas J Flammer; Lilach O Lerman; Amir Lerman
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.243

10.  Genetic testing of children for predisposition to mood disorders: anticipating the clinical issues.

Authors:  Jessica A Erickson; Lili Kuzmich; Kelly E Ormond; Erynn Gordon; Michael F Christman; Mildred K Cho; Douglas F Levinson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.