Literature DB >> 19258487

Biomarker-calibrated energy and protein consumption and increased cancer risk among postmenopausal women.

Ross L Prentice1, Pamela A Shaw, Sheila A Bingham, Shirley A A Beresford, Bette Caan, Marian L Neuhouser, Ruth E Patterson, Marcia L Stefanick, Suzanne Satterfield, Cynthia A Thomson, Linda Snetselaar, Asha Thomas, Lesley F Tinker.   

Abstract

The authors previously reported equations, derived from the Nutrient Biomarker Study within the Women's Health Initiative, that produce calibrated estimates of energy, protein, and percentage of energy from protein consumption from corresponding food frequency questionnaire estimates and data on other factors, such as body mass index, age, and ethnicity. Here, these equations were applied to yield calibrated consumption estimates for 21,711 women enrolled in the Women's Health Initiative dietary modification trial comparison group and 59,105 women enrolled in the observational study. These estimates were related prospectively to total and site-specific invasive cancer incidence (1993-2005). In combined cohort analyses that do not control for body mass, uncalibrated energy was not associated with total cancer incidence or site-specific cancer incidence for most sites, whereas biomarker-calibrated energy was positively associated with total cancer (hazard ratio = 1.18, 95% confidence interval: 1.10, 1.27, for 20% consumption increase), as well as with breast, colon, endometrial, and kidney cancer (respective hazard ratios of 1.24, 1.35, 1.83, and 1.47). Calibrated protein was weakly associated, and calibrated percentage of energy from protein was inversely associated, with total cancer. Calibrated energy and body mass index associations were highly interdependent. Implications for the interpretation of nutritional epidemiology studies are described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19258487      PMCID: PMC2732977          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwp008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  21 in total

Review 1.  Urine nitrogen as a biomarker for the validation of dietary protein intake.

Authors:  Sheila A Bingham
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  The Women's Health Initiative recruitment methods and results.

Authors:  Jennifer Hays; Julie R Hunt; F Allan Hubbell; Garnet L Anderson; Marian Limacher; Catherine Allen; Jacques E Rossouw
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  Outcomes ascertainment and adjudication methods in the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  J David Curb; Anne McTiernan; Susan R Heckbert; Charles Kooperberg; Janet Stanford; Michael Nevitt; Karen C Johnson; Lori Proulx-Burns; Lisa Pastore; Michael Criqui; Sandra Daugherty
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Structure of dietary measurement error: results of the OPEN biomarker study.

Authors:  Victor Kipnis; Amy F Subar; Douglas Midthune; Laurence S Freedman; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Richard P Troiano; Sheila Bingham; Dale A Schoeller; Arthur Schatzkin; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Environmental factors and cancer incidence and mortality in different countries, with special reference to dietary practices.

Authors:  B Armstrong; R Doll
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1975-04-15       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Using intake biomarkers to evaluate the extent of dietary misreporting in a large sample of adults: the OPEN study.

Authors:  Amy F Subar; Victor Kipnis; Richard P Troiano; Douglas Midthune; Dale A Schoeller; Sheila Bingham; Carolyn O Sharbaugh; Jillian Trabulsi; Shirley Runswick; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Joel Sunshine; Arthur Schatzkin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire.

Authors:  W C Willett; L Sampson; M J Stampfer; B Rosner; C Bain; J Witschi; C H Hennekens; F E Speizer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Use of recovery biomarkers to calibrate nutrient consumption self-reports in the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Marian L Neuhouser; Lesley Tinker; Pamela A Shaw; Dale Schoeller; Sheila A Bingham; Linda Van Horn; Shirley A A Beresford; Bette Caan; Cynthia Thomson; Suzanne Satterfield; Lew Kuller; Gerardo Heiss; Ellen Smit; Gloria Sarto; Judith Ockene; Marcia L Stefanick; Annlouise Assaf; Shirley Runswick; Ross L Prentice
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Dietary adherence in the Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification Trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2004-04

10.  The Women's Health Initiative Observational Study: baseline characteristics of participants and reliability of baseline measures.

Authors:  Robert D Langer; Emily White; Cora E Lewis; Jane M Kotchen; Susan L Hendrix; Maurizio Trevisan
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.797

View more
  58 in total

1.  Biomarker-calibrated dietary energy and protein intake associations with diabetes risk among postmenopausal women from the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Lesley F Tinker; Gloria E Sarto; Barbara V Howard; Ying Huang; Marian L Neuhouser; Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani; Jeannette M Beasley; Karen L Margolis; Charles B Eaton; Lawrence S Phillips; Ross L Prentice
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Using regression calibration equations that combine self-reported intake and biomarker measures to obtain unbiased estimates and more powerful tests of dietary associations.

Authors:  Laurence S Freedman; Douglas Midthune; Raymond J Carroll; Nataŝa Tasevska; Arthur Schatzkin; Julie Mares; Lesley Tinker; Nancy Potischman; Victor Kipnis
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Validity of a multipass, web-based, 24-hour self-administered recall for assessment of total energy intake in blacks and whites.

Authors:  Lenore Arab; Chi-Hong Tseng; Alfonso Ang; Patricia Jardack
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Dietary assessment and the reliability of nutritional epidemiology research reports.

Authors:  Ross L Prentice
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Measurement error of dietary self-report in intervention trials.

Authors:  Loki Natarajan; Minya Pu; Juanjuan Fan; Richard A Levine; Ruth E Patterson; Cynthia A Thomson; Cheryl L Rock; John P Pierce
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Hazard ratio estimation for biomarker-calibrated dietary exposures.

Authors:  Pamela A Shaw; Ross L Prentice
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Neoplasia and neoplasm-associated lesions in laboratory colonies of zebrafish emphasizing key influences of diet and aquaculture system design.

Authors:  Jan M Spitsbergen; Donald R Buhler; Tracy S Peterson
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2012

8.  A meta-analysis of the effects of energy intake on risk of digestive cancers.

Authors:  Xiao-Feng Yu; Yi-Qian Wang; Jian Zou; Jie Dong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Relationships among dietary nutrients and subjective sleep, objective sleep, and napping in women.

Authors:  Michael A Grandner; Daniel F Kripke; Nirinjini Naidoo; Robert D Langer
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 3.492

10.  Association of chromosome translocation rate with low dose occupational radiation exposures in U.S. radiologic technologists.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Deukwoo Kwon; Kazataka Doi; Steven L Simon; Dale L Preston; Michele M Doody; Terrence Lee; Jeremy S Miller; Diane M Kampa; Parveen Bhatti; James D Tucker; Martha S Linet; Alice J Sigurdson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 2.841

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.