Literature DB >> 22004367

Hazard ratio estimation for biomarker-calibrated dietary exposures.

Pamela A Shaw1, Ross L Prentice.   

Abstract

Uncertainty concerning the measurement error properties of self-reported diet has important implications for the reliability of nutritional epidemiology reports. Biomarkers based on the urinary recovery of expended nutrients can provide an objective measure of short-term nutrient consumption for certain nutrients and, when applied to a subset of a study cohort, can be used to calibrate corresponding self-report nutrient consumption assessments. A nonstandard measurement error model that makes provision for systematic error and subject-specific error, along with the usual independent random error, is needed for the self-report data. Three estimation procedures for hazard ratio (Cox model) parameters are extended for application to this more complex measurement error structure. These procedures are risk set regression calibration, conditional score, and nonparametric corrected score. An estimator for the cumulative baseline hazard function is also provided. The performance of each method is assessed in a simulation study. The methods are then applied to an example from the Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification Trial.
© 2011, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22004367      PMCID: PMC3648661          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01690.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  25 in total

1.  On corrected score approach for proportional hazards model with covariate measurement error.

Authors:  Xiao Song; Yijian Huang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Estimating the parameters in the Cox model when covariate variables are measured with error.

Authors:  P Hu; A A Tsiatis; M Davidian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Survival analysis with error-prone time-varying covariates: a risk set calibration approach.

Authors:  Xiaomei Liao; David M Zucker; Yi Li; Donna Spiegelman
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Biomarker-calibrated energy and protein consumption and cardiovascular disease risk among postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Ross L Prentice; Ying Huang; Lewis H Kuller; Lesley F Tinker; Linda Van Horn; Marcia L Stefanick; Gloria Sarto; Judith Ockene; Karen C Johnson
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Design of the Women's Health Initiative clinical trial and observational study. The Women's Health Initiative Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1998-02

6.  Dietary fiber and colorectal cancer risk: a nested case-control study using food diaries.

Authors:  Christina C Dahm; Ruth H Keogh; Elizabeth A Spencer; Darren C Greenwood; Tim J Key; Ian S Fentiman; Martin J Shipley; Eric J Brunner; Janet E Cade; Victoria J Burley; Gita Mishra; Alison M Stephen; Diana Kuh; Ian R White; Robert Luben; Marleen A H Lentjes; Kay Tee Khaw; Sheila A Rodwell Bingham
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  A comparison of two dietary instruments for evaluating the fat-breast cancer relationship.

Authors:  Laurence S Freedman; Nancy Potischman; Victor Kipnis; Douglas Midthune; Arthur Schatzkin; Frances E Thompson; Richard P Troiano; Ross Prentice; Ruth Patterson; Raymond Carroll; Amy F Subar
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 7.196

8.  Use of recovery biomarkers to calibrate nutrient consumption self-reports in the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Marian L Neuhouser; Lesley Tinker; Pamela A Shaw; Dale Schoeller; Sheila A Bingham; Linda Van Horn; Shirley A A Beresford; Bette Caan; Cynthia Thomson; Suzanne Satterfield; Lew Kuller; Gerardo Heiss; Ellen Smit; Gloria Sarto; Judith Ockene; Marcia L Stefanick; Annlouise Assaf; Shirley Runswick; Ross L Prentice
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Are imprecise methods obscuring a relation between fat and breast cancer?

Authors:  Sheila A Bingham; Robert Luben; Ailsa Welch; Nicholas Wareham; Kay-Tee Khaw; Nicholas Day
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-07-19       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Urine nitrogen as an independent validatory measure of dietary intake: a study of nitrogen balance in individuals consuming their normal diet.

Authors:  S A Bingham; J H Cummings
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 7.045

View more
  7 in total

1.  Regression calibration in nutritional epidemiology: example of fat density and total energy in relationship to postmenopausal breast cancer.

Authors:  Ross L Prentice; Mary Pettinger; Lesley F Tinker; Ying Huang; Cynthia A Thomson; Karen C Johnson; Jeannette Beasley; Garnet Anderson; James M Shikany; Rowan T Chlebowski; Marian L Neuhouser
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Errors in multiple variables in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) cohort and electronic health record data: statistical challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Bryan E Shepherd; Pamela A Shaw
Journal:  Stat Commun Infect Dis       Date:  2020-10-07

3.  An approximate quasi-likelihood approach for error-prone failure time outcomes and exposures.

Authors:  Lillian A Boe; Lesley F Tinker; Pamela A Shaw
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 4.  STRATOS guidance document on measurement error and misclassification of variables in observational epidemiology: Part 1-Basic theory and simple methods of adjustment.

Authors:  Ruth H Keogh; Pamela A Shaw; Paul Gustafson; Raymond J Carroll; Veronika Deffner; Kevin W Dodd; Helmut Küchenhoff; Janet A Tooze; Michael P Wallace; Victor Kipnis; Laurence S Freedman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  SEMIPARAMETRIC TIME TO EVENT MODELS IN THE PRESENCE OF ERROR-PRONE, SELF-REPORTED OUTCOMES-WITH APPLICATION TO THE WOMEN'S HEALTH INITIATIVE.

Authors:  Xiangdong Gu; Yunsheng Ma; Raji Balasubramanian
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.083

6.  Comparison of Methods Used to Correct Self-Reported Protein Intake for Systematic Variation in Reported Energy Intake Using Quantitative Biomarkers of Dietary Intake.

Authors:  Amy L Korth; Surabhi Bhutani; Marian L Neuhouser; Shirley A Beresford; Linda Snetselaar; Lesley F Tinker; Dale A Schoeller
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Raking and regression calibration: Methods to address bias from correlated covariate and time-to-event error.

Authors:  Eric J Oh; Bryan E Shepherd; Thomas Lumley; Pamela A Shaw
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.373

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.