BACKGROUND: Self-report of dietary energy and protein intakes has been shown to be systematically and differentially underreported. OBJECTIVE: We assessed and compared the association of diabetes among postmenopausal women with biomarker-calibrated and uncalibrated dietary energy and protein intakes from food-frequency questionnaires (FFQs). DESIGN: The analyses were performed for 74,155 participants of various race-ethnicities from the Women's Health Initiative. Uncalibrated and calibrated energy and protein intakes from FFQs were assessed for associations with incident diabetes by using HR estimates based on Cox regression. RESULTS: A 20% increment in uncalibrated energy consumption was associated with increased diabetes risk (HR) of 1.03 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.05), 2.41 (95% CI: 2.06, 2.82) with biomarker calibration, and 1.30 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.76) after adjustment for BMI. A 20% increment in uncalibrated protein (g/d) resulted in an HR of 1.05 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.07), 1.82 (95% CI: 1.56, 2.12) with calibration, and 1.16 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.28) with adjustment for BMI. A 20% increment in uncalibrated protein density (% of energy from protein) resulted in an HR of 1.13 (95% CI: 1.09, 1.17), 1.01 (95% CI: 0.75, 1.37) with calibration, and 1.19 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.32) with adjustment for BMI. CONCLUSIONS:Higher protein and total energy intakes (calibrated) appear to be associated with a substantially increased diabetes risk that may be mediated by an increase in body mass over time. Diet-disease associations without correction of self-reported measurement error should be viewed with caution. This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00000611.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Self-report of dietary energy and protein intakes has been shown to be systematically and differentially underreported. OBJECTIVE: We assessed and compared the association of diabetes among postmenopausal women with biomarker-calibrated and uncalibrated dietary energy and protein intakes from food-frequency questionnaires (FFQs). DESIGN: The analyses were performed for 74,155 participants of various race-ethnicities from the Women's Health Initiative. Uncalibrated and calibrated energy and protein intakes from FFQs were assessed for associations with incident diabetes by using HR estimates based on Cox regression. RESULTS: A 20% increment in uncalibrated energy consumption was associated with increased diabetes risk (HR) of 1.03 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.05), 2.41 (95% CI: 2.06, 2.82) with biomarker calibration, and 1.30 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.76) after adjustment for BMI. A 20% increment in uncalibrated protein (g/d) resulted in an HR of 1.05 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.07), 1.82 (95% CI: 1.56, 2.12) with calibration, and 1.16 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.28) with adjustment for BMI. A 20% increment in uncalibrated protein density (% of energy from protein) resulted in an HR of 1.13 (95% CI: 1.09, 1.17), 1.01 (95% CI: 0.75, 1.37) with calibration, and 1.19 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.32) with adjustment for BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Higher protein and total energy intakes (calibrated) appear to be associated with a substantially increased diabetes risk that may be mediated by an increase in body mass over time. Diet-disease associations without correction of self-reported measurement error should be viewed with caution. This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00000611.
Authors: Elizabeth A Walker; Mark Molitch; M Kaye Kramer; Steven Kahn; Yong Ma; Sharon Edelstein; Kellie Smith; Mariana Kiefer Johnson; Abbas Kitabchi; Jill Crandall Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Barbara C Olendzki; Yunsheng Ma; James R Hébert; Sherry L Pagoto; Philip A Merriam; Milagros C Rosal; Ira S Ockene Journal: J Am Diet Assoc Date: 2008-06
Authors: Ivonne Sluijs; Joline W J Beulens; Daphne L van der A; Annemieke M W Spijkerman; Diederick E Grobbee; Yvonne T van der Schouw Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-10-13 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Hee Young Yun; Lesley F Tinker; Marian L Neuhouser; Dale A Schoeller; Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani; Linda G Snetselaar; Linda V Van Horn; Charles B Eaton; Ross L Prentice; Johanna W Lampe; Diane M O'Brien Journal: J Nutr Date: 2020-10-12 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Marian L Neuhouser; Chongzhi Di; Lesley F Tinker; Cynthia Thomson; Barbara Sternfeld; Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani; Marcia L Stefanick; Stacy Sims; J David Curb; Michael Lamonte; Rebecca Seguin; Karen C Johnson; Ross L Prentice Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-02-22 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Gordon I Smith; Jun Yoshino; Shannon C Kelly; Dominic N Reeds; Adewole Okunade; Bruce W Patterson; Samuel Klein; Bettina Mittendorfer Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2016-10-11 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Melanie D Hingle; Betsy C Wertheim; Marian L Neuhouser; Lesley F Tinker; Barbara V Howard; Karen Johnson; Simin Liu; Lawrence S Phillips; Lihong Qi; Gloria Sarto; Tami Turner; Molly E Waring; Cynthia A Thomson Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2017-01-05 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Laurence S Freedman; John M Commins; James E Moler; Lenore Arab; David J Baer; Victor Kipnis; Douglas Midthune; Alanna J Moshfegh; Marian L Neuhouser; Ross L Prentice; Arthur Schatzkin; Donna Spiegelman; Amy F Subar; Lesley F Tinker; Walter Willett Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2014-06-10 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Diewertje Sluik; Elske M Brouwer-Brolsma; Agnes A M Berendsen; Vera Mikkilä; Sally D Poppitt; Marta P Silvestre; Angelo Tremblay; Louis Pérusse; Claude Bouchard; Anne Raben; Edith J M Feskens Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 7.045