Literature DB >> 19253376

Noise figure limits for circular loop MR coils.

Ananda Kumar1, William A Edelstein, Paul A Bottomley.   

Abstract

Circular loops are the most common MR detectors. Loop arrays offer improved signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and spatial resolution, and enable parallel imaging. As loop size decreases, loop noise increases relative to sample noise, ultimately dominating the SNR. Here, relative noise contributions from the sample and the coil are quantified by a coil noise figure (NF), NF(coil), which adds to the conventional system NF. NF(coil) is determined from the ratio of unloaded-to-loaded coil quality factors Q. Losses from conductors, capacitors, solder joints, eddy currents in overlapped array coils, and the sample are measured and/or computed from 40 to 400 MHz using analytical and full-wave numerical electromagnetic analysis. The Qs are measured for round wire and tape loops tuned from 50 to 400 MHz. NF(coil) is determined as a function of the radius, frequency, and number of tuning capacitors. The computed and experimental Qs and NF(coil)s agree within approximately 10%. The NF(coil) values for 3 cm-diameter wire coils are 3 dB, 1.9 dB, 0.8 dB, 0.2 dB, and 0.1 dB, at 1T, 1.5T, 3T, 7T, and 9.4T, respectively. Wire and tape perform similarly, but tape coils in arrays have substantial eddy current losses. The ability to characterize and reliably predict component- and geometry-associated coil losses is key to designing SNR-optimized loop and phased-array detectors. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19253376      PMCID: PMC2869245          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  37 in total

1.  Increased vessel depiction of the carotid bifurcation with a specialized 16-channel phased array coil at 3T.

Authors:  Quinn Tate; Seong-Eun Kim; Gerald Treiman; Dennis L Parker; J Rock Hadley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  A nested phosphorus and proton coil array for brain magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy.

Authors:  Ryan Brown; Karthik Lakshmanan; Guillaume Madelin; Prodromos Parasoglou
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-09-13       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Surface coil with reduced specific absorption rate for rat MRI at 7 T.

Authors:  Sergio E Solis-Najera; Rodrigo Martin; Fabian Vazquez; Alfredo O Rodriguez
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  A method to assess the loss of a dipole antenna for ultra-high-field MRI.

Authors:  Gang Chen; Christopher M Collins; Daniel K Sodickson; Graham C Wiggins
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Effects of coplanar shielding for high field MRI.

Authors:  Joseph V Rispoli; Matthew D Wilcox; Samantha By; Steven M Wright; Mary P McDougall
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2016-08

6.  MRI endoscopy using intrinsically localized probes.

Authors:  Shashank Sathyanarayana; Paul A Bottomley
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A multichannel, real-time MRI RF power monitor for independent SAR determination.

Authors:  Abdel-Monem M El-Sharkawy; Di Qian; Paul A Bottomley; William A Edelstein
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Guide to Simulating Complex NMR Probe Circuits.

Authors:  F David Doty
Journal:  Concepts Magn Reson Part A Bridg Educ Res       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 0.481

9.  An eight-channel sodium/proton coil for brain MRI at 3 T.

Authors:  Karthik Lakshmanan; Ryan Brown; Guillaume Madelin; Yongxian Qian; Fernando Boada; Graham C Wiggins
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 10.  Massively parallel MRI detector arrays.

Authors:  Boris Keil; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.