Literature DB >> 31104110

Imaging of nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan scaffolds using a cone beam computed tomography device on rat calvarial defects with histological verification.

Emmanouil Chatzipetros1, Zafeiroula Yfanti2, Panos Christopoulos3, Catherine Donta2, Spyros Damaskos2, Evangelos Tsiambas4, Dimitris Tsiourvas5, Eleni-Marina Kalogirou6, Konstantinos I Tosios6, Kostas Tsiklakis2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Τhis study aims at determining the ability of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to visualize critical-size defects (CSD) created at rat calvaria and filled with 75/25 w/w nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan (nHAp/CS) scaffolds, prior to their histological investigation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty adult Sprague Dawley rats, 15 males and 15 females, were used. Two CSD, 5 mm in diameter, were bilaterally trephined in the parietal bone. The right CSD was filled with nHAp/CS scaffold, while the left CSD remained empty, as the control group. Two female rats died post-operatively. Rats were euthanized at 2, 4, and 8 weeks post-surgery. Twenty-eight specimens (15 × 2 × 10 mm) were resected-containing both CSDs-and then scanned using a NewTom VGi CBCT imaging unit (Verona, Italy). The manufacturer's software trace region profile tool (NNT v6.2, Verona, Italy) was used in selected axial slices. The greyscale value (in VGiHU) and the traced/selected region of interest (ROI, in mm2) of those areas were automatically calculated. Subsequently, all specimens were histologically examined.
RESULTS: An increased VGiHU (P = 0.000), was observed in the experimental group relative to the control group. The ROI of CSD (in mm2) was significantly reduced (P = 0.001) from the fourth to the eighth week in both groups. No statistically significant difference between male and female rats (P = 0.188) was observed with respect to VGiHU.
CONCLUSIONS: The nHAp/CS scaffolds are easily visualized using a particular high-resolution CBCT device. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Both the CBCT measurements and also the histological results suggest that the nHAp/CS scaffold presence contributes to new bone formation in rat calvarial CSD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chitosan; Cone beam computed tomography; Hydroxyapatites

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31104110     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-02939-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  34 in total

Review 1.  Synthetic bone graft substitutes.

Authors:  W R Moore; S E Graves; G I Bain
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.872

Review 2.  Rodent models in bone-related research: the relevance of calvarial defects in the assessment of bone regeneration strategies.

Authors:  P S Gomes; M H Fernandes
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 3.  Biomaterials in orthopaedics.

Authors:  M Navarro; A Michiardi; O Castaño; J A Planell
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Harvesting autogenous iliac bone grafts. A review of complications and techniques.

Authors:  L T Kurz; S R Garfin; R E Booth
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Biology of bone transplantation.

Authors:  H Burchardt
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.472

6.  Evaluation of filling materials in membrane--protected bone defects. A comparative histomorphometric study in the mandible of miniature pigs.

Authors:  D Buser; B Hoffmann; J P Bernard; A Lussi; D Mettler; R K Schenk
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.977

7.  Effect of GBR in combination with deproteinized bovine bone mineral and/or enamel matrix proteins on the healing of critical-size defects.

Authors:  Nikolaos Donos; Niklaus P Lang; Ioannis K Karoussis; Dieter Bosshardt; Maurizio Tonetti; Lambros Kostopoulos
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.977

8.  Importance of the critical-size bone defect in testing bone-regenerating materials.

Authors:  C Bosch; B Melsen; K Vargervik
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 9.  Bone regeneration: current concepts and future directions.

Authors:  Rozalia Dimitriou; Elena Jones; Dennis McGonagle; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  "Over-inlay" block graft and differential morphometry: a novel block graft model to study bone regeneration and host-to-graft interfaces in rats.

Authors:  Giulia Ghiacci; Gallia Graiani; Francesca Ravanetti; Simone Lumetti; Edoardo Manfredi; Carlo Galli; Antonio Cacchioli; Guido Maria Macaluso; Roberto Sala
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.614

View more
  3 in total

1.  The role of nanohydroxyapatite on the morphological, physical, and biological properties of chitosan nanofibers.

Authors:  Tabata P Sato; Bruno V M Rodrigues; Daphne C R Mello; Eliseu A Münchow; Juliana S Ribeiro; João Paulo B Machado; Luana M R Vasconcellos; Anderson O Lobo; Marco C Bottino; Alexandre L S Borges
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  The effect of nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan scaffolds on rat calvarial defects for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Emmanouil Chatzipetros; Spyros Damaskos; Konstantinos I Tosios; Panos Christopoulos; Catherine Donta; Eleni-Marina Kalogirou; Zafeiroula Yfanti; Dimitris Tsiourvas; Aggeliki Papavasiliou; Kostas Tsiklakis
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-05-24

3.  Comparison of Two Bovine Commercial Xenografts in the Regeneration of Critical Cranial Defects.

Authors:  Carlos Humberto Valencia-Llano; Diego López-Tenorio; Marcela Saavedra; Paula A Zapata; Carlos David Grande-Tovar
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 4.927

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.