Literature DB >> 16958057

Imaging artifacts at 3.0T.

Matt A Bernstein1, John Huston, Heidi A Ward.   

Abstract

Clinical MRI at a field strength of 3.0T is finding increasing use. However, along with the advantages of 3.0T, such as increased SNR, there can be drawbacks, including increased levels of imaging artifacts. Although every imaging artifact observed at 3.0T can also be present at 1.5T, the intensity level is often higher at 3.0T and thus the artifact is more objectionable. This review describes some of the imaging artifacts that are commonly observed with 3.0T imaging, and their root causes. When possible, countermeasures that reduce the artifact level are described. Copyright (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16958057     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  80 in total

1.  Optimization of 3D-variable refocusing flip angle RARE imaging for high-resolution volumetric black-blood angiography.

Authors:  Masami Yoneyama; Masanobu Nakamura; Takashi Tabuchi; Atsushi Takemura; Makoto Obara
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-06-20

2.  Renal imaging at 7 Tesla: preliminary results.

Authors:  Lale Umutlu; Stephan Orzada; Sonja Kinner; Stefan Maderwald; Irina Brote; Andreas K Bitz; Oliver Kraff; Susanne C Ladd; Gerald Antoch; Mark E Ladd; Harald H Quick; Thomas C Lauenstein
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Molecular characterization of rheumatoid arthritis with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Gu; Linda Nguyen; Abhijit J Chaudhari; John D MacKenzie
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-04

4.  [Effect of oral alloy post and core on magnetic resonance imaging].

Authors:  Yin Fang; Li Xin; Ma Qingyun; Wang Lu; Song Ye
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2014-12

5.  Intensity non-uniformity correction using N3 on 3-T scanners with multichannel phased array coils.

Authors:  Richard G Boyes; Jeff L Gunter; Chris Frost; Andrew L Janke; Thomas Yeatman; Derek L G Hill; Matt A Bernstein; Paul M Thompson; Michael W Weiner; Norbert Schuff; Gene E Alexander; Ronald J Killiany; Charles DeCarli; Clifford R Jack; Nick C Fox
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance imaging methodology.

Authors:  Ewald Moser; Andreas Stadlbauer; Christian Windischberger; Harald H Quick; Mark E Ladd
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging of cranial nerves at 7 Tesla.

Authors:  A E Grams; O Kraff; J Kalkmann; S Orzada; S Maderwald; M E Ladd; M Forsting; E R Gizewski
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.649

8.  T1 weighted brain images at 7 Tesla unbiased for Proton Density, T2* contrast and RF coil receive B1 sensitivity with simultaneous vessel visualization.

Authors:  Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Edwards J Auerbach; Cheryl Olman; Essa Yacoub; Kâmil Uğurbil; Steen Moeller
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Mitigation of B1+ inhomogeneity using spatially selective excitation with jointly designed quadratic spatial encoding magnetic fields and RF shimming.

Authors:  Yi-Cheng Hsu; Riccardo Lattanzi; Ying-Hua Chu; Martijn A Cloos; Daniel K Sodickson; Fa-Hsuan Lin
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-10-02       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Noninvasive Assessment of Renal Fibrosis with Magnetization Transfer MR Imaging: Validation and Evaluation in Murine Renal Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Kai Jiang; Christopher M Ferguson; Behzad Ebrahimi; Hui Tang; Timothy L Kline; Tyson A Burningham; Prassana K Mishra; Joseph P Grande; Slobodan I Macura; Lilach O Lerman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.