Literature DB >> 19228185

On the opportunity for sexual selection, the Bateman gradient and the maximum intensity of sexual selection.

Adam G Jones1.   

Abstract

Bateman's classic paper on fly mating systems inspired quantitative study of sexual selection but also resulted in much debate and confusion. Here, I consider the meaning of Bateman's principles in the context of selection theory. Success in precopulatory sexual selection can be quantified as a "mating differential," which is the covariance between trait values and relative mating success. The mating differential is converted into a selection differential by the Bateman gradient, which is the least squares regression of relative reproductive success on relative mating success. Hence, a complete understanding of precopulatory sexual selection requires knowledge of two equally important aspects of mating patterns: the mating differential, which requires a focus on mechanisms generating covariance between trait values and mating success, and the Bateman gradient, which requires knowledge of the genetic mating system. An upper limit on the magnitude of the selection differential on any sexually selected trait is given by the product of the standard deviation in relative mating success and the Bateman gradient. This latter view of the maximum selection differential provides a clearer focus on the important aspects of precopulatory sexual selection than other methods and therefore should be an important part of future studies of sexual selection.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19228185     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00664.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  48 in total

1.  A rigorous comparison of sexual selection indexes via simulations of diverse mating systems.

Authors:  Jonathan M Henshaw; Andrew T Kahn; Karoline Fritzsche
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Sexual selection and the differential effect of polyandry.

Authors:  Julie Collet; David S Richardson; Kirsty Worley; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sex roles and sexual selection: lessons from a dynamic model system.

Authors:  Trond Amundsen
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 2.624

Review 4.  Mate choice and sexual selection: what have we learned since Darwin?

Authors:  Adam G Jones; Nicholas L Ratterman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Variance in male lifetime reproductive success and estimation of the degree of polygyny in a primate.

Authors:  Constance Dubuc; Angelina Ruiz-Lambides; Anja Widdig
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.671

6.  Multiple mating and its relationship to brood size in pregnant fishes versus pregnant mammals and other viviparous vertebrates.

Authors:  John C Avise; Jin-Xian Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Towards a predictive conservation biology: the devil is in the behaviour.

Authors:  Bernt-Erik Sæther; Steinar Engen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  How multiple mating by females affects sexual selection.

Authors:  Stephen M Shuster; William R Briggs; Patricia A Dennis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Extrapair mating and the strength of sexual selection: insights from a polymorphic species.

Authors:  Andrea S Grunst; Melissa L Grunst; Marisa L Korody; Lindsay M Forrette; Rusty A Gonser; Elaine M Tuttle
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 2.671

10.  Selection gradients, the opportunity for selection, and the coefficient of determination.

Authors:  Jacob A Moorad; Michael J Wade
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 3.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.