Literature DB >> 23448880

Selection gradients, the opportunity for selection, and the coefficient of determination.

Jacob A Moorad1, Michael J Wade.   

Abstract

Abstract We derive the relationship between R(2) (the coefficient of determination), selection gradients, and the opportunity for selection for univariate and multivariate cases. Our main result is to show that the portion of the opportunity for selection that is caused by variation for any trait is equal to the product of its selection gradient and its selection differential. This relationship is a corollary of the first and second fundamental theorems of natural selection, and it permits one to investigate the portions of the total opportunity for selection that are involved in directional selection, stabilizing (and diversifying) selection, and correlational selection, which is important to morphological integration. It also allows one to determine the fraction of fitness variation not explained by variation in measured phenotypes and therefore attributable to random (or, at least, unknown) influences. We apply our methods to a human data set to show how sex-specific mating success as a component of fitness variance can be decoupled from that owing to prereproductive mortality. By quantifying linear sources of sexual selection and quadratic sources of sexual selection, we illustrate that the former is stronger in males, while the latter is stronger in females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23448880      PMCID: PMC3620722          DOI: 10.1086/669158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  26 in total

1.  Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding.

Authors:  Tom Tregenza; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Estimating evolutionary parameters when viability selection is operating.

Authors:  Jarrod D Hadfield
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Visualizing and quantifying natural selection.

Authors:  E D Brodie; A J Moore; F J Janzen
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  ON THE MEASUREMENT OF NATURAL AND SEXUAL SELECTION: THEORY.

Authors:  Stevan J Arnold; Michael J Wade
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  ON THE MEASUREMENT OF NATURAL AND SEXUAL SELECTION: APPLICATIONS.

Authors:  Stevan J Arnold; Michael J Wade
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  THE CAUSES OF NATURAL SELECTION.

Authors:  Michael J Wade; Susan Kalisz
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  SEXUAL DIMORPHISM, SEXUAL SELECTION, AND ADAPTATION IN POLYGENIC CHARACTERS.

Authors:  Russell Lande
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Selection and covariance.

Authors:  G R Price
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-01       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Change of fitness by selection for a quantitative character.

Authors:  P O'Donald
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 1.570

10.  Male coercion and the costs of promiscuous mating for female chimpanzees.

Authors:  Martin N Muller; Sonya M Kahlenberg; Melissa Emery Thompson; Richard W Wrangham
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  10 in total

1.  A rigorous comparison of sexual selection indexes via simulations of diverse mating systems.

Authors:  Jonathan M Henshaw; Andrew T Kahn; Karoline Fritzsche
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Individual fitness and phenotypic selection in age-structured populations with constant growth rates.

Authors:  Jacob A Moorad
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  A demographic transition altered the strength of selection for fitness and age-specific survival and fertility in a 19th century American population.

Authors:  Jacob A Moorad
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Multi-level sexual selection: individual and family-level selection for mating success in a historical human population.

Authors:  Jacob A Moorad
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  The Missing Response to Selection in the Wild.

Authors:  Benoit Pujol; Simon Blanchet; Anne Charmantier; Etienne Danchin; Benoit Facon; Pascal Marrot; Fabrice Roux; Ivan Scotti; Céline Teplitsky; Caroline E Thomson; Isabel Winney
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Conservation genetics as a management tool: The five best-supported paradigms to assist the management of threatened species.

Authors:  Yvonne Willi; Torsten N Kristensen; Carla M Sgrò; Andrew R Weeks; Michael Ørsted; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 12.779

7.  The demographic transition influences variance in fitness and selection on height and BMI in rural Gambia.

Authors:  Alexandre Courtiol; Ian J Rickard; Virpi Lummaa; Andrew M Prentice; Anthony J C Fulford; Stephen C Stearns
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  The measure and significance of Bateman's principles.

Authors:  Julie M Collet; Rebecca F Dean; Kirsty Worley; David S Richardson; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The importance of selection at the level of the pair over 25 years in a natural population of birds.

Authors:  Mats Björklund; Lars Gustafsson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Eco-evolutionary dynamics in a contemporary human population.

Authors:  Fanie Pelletier; Gabriel Pigeon; Patrick Bergeron; Francine M Mayer; Mireille Boisvert; Denis Réale; Emmanuel Milot
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 14.919

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.