Literature DB >> 31352892

Towards a predictive conservation biology: the devil is in the behaviour.

Bernt-Erik Sæther1, Steinar Engen2.   

Abstract

One of the most important challenges in conservation biology is to predict the viability of populations of vulnerable and threatened species. This requires that the demographic stochasticity strongly affecting the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of especially small populations is correctly estimated and modelled. Here, we summarize theoretical evidence showing that the demographic variance in population dynamics is a key parameter determining the probability of extinction and also is directly linked to the magnitude of the genetic drift in the population. The demographic variance is dependent on the mating system, being larger in a polygynous than in monogamous populations. Understanding factors affecting intersexual differences in mating success is therefore essential in explaining variation in the demographic variance. We hypothesize that the strength of sexual selection, for example, quantified by the Bateman gradient, may be a useful predictor of the magnitude of the demographic stochasticity and hence the genetic drift in the population. We provide results from a field study of moose that support this claim. Thus, including central principles from behavioural ecology may increase the reliability of population viability analyses through an improvement of our understanding of factors affecting stochastic influences on population dynamics and evolutionary processes. This article is part of the theme issue 'Linking behaviour to dynamics of populations and communities: application of novel approaches in behavioural ecology to conservation'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  demographic stochasticity; effective population size; genetic drift; sexual selection; stochastic population dynamics

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31352892      PMCID: PMC6710570          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  41 in total

1.  Estimating the ratio of effective to actual size of an age-structured population from individual demographic data.

Authors:  Steinar Engen; R Lande; B-E Saether; P Gienapp
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.411

2.  Behavior and conservation: a bridge too far?

Authors:  Tim Caro
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 3.  On the opportunity for sexual selection, the Bateman gradient and the maximum intensity of sexual selection.

Authors:  Adam G Jones
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  The logic of territory choice: implications for conservation and source-sink dynamics.

Authors:  H Kokko; W J Sutherland; R A Johnstone
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Estimating demographic contributions to effective population size in an age-structured wild population experiencing environmental and demographic stochasticity.

Authors:  Amanda E Trask; Eric M Bignal; Davy I McCracken; Stuart B Piertney; Jane M Reid
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 5.091

6.  NATURAL SELECTION AND RANDOM GENETIC DRIFT IN PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION.

Authors:  Russell Lande
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Combining behaviour and population dynamics with applications for predicting consequences of habitat loss.

Authors:  W J Sutherland; P M Dolman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1994-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme.

Authors:  S J Gould; R C Lewontin
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1979-09-21

9.  The average lifetime of a population in a varying environment.

Authors:  E G Leigh
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1981-05-21       Impact factor: 2.691

10.  MEASURING THE EFFECTS OF PAIRING SUCCESS, EXTRA-PAIR COPULATIONS AND MATE QUALITY ON THE OPPORTUNITY FOR SEXUAL SELECTION.

Authors:  Michael S Webster; Stephen Pruett-Jones; David F Westneat; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  5 in total

1.  Can behavioural ecologists help establish protected areas?

Authors:  Tim Caro; Joel Berger
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Linking behaviour to dynamics of populations and communities: application of novel approaches in behavioural ecology to conservation.

Authors:  Jakob Bro-Jørgensen; Daniel W Franks; Kristine Meise
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Behavioural ecology and infectious disease: implications for conservation of biodiversity.

Authors:  James Herrera; Charles L Nunn
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Integrating models of human behaviour between the individual and population levels to inform conservation interventions.

Authors:  Andrew D M Dobson; Emiel de Lange; Aidan Keane; Harriet Ibbett; E J Milner-Gulland
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Animal learning may contribute to both problems and solutions for wildlife-train collisions.

Authors:  Colleen Cassady St Clair; Jonathan Backs; Alyssa Friesen; Aditya Gangadharan; Patrick Gilhooly; Maureen Murray; Sonya Pollock
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.