Literature DB >> 19226645

How race becomes biology: embodiment of social inequality.

Clarence C Gravlee1.   

Abstract

The current debate over racial inequalities in health is arguably the most important venue for advancing both scientific and public understanding of race, racism, and human biological variation. In the United States and elsewhere, there are well-defined inequalities between racially defined groups for a range of biological outcomes-cardiovascular disease, diabetes, stroke, certain cancers, low birth weight, preterm delivery, and others. Among biomedical researchers, these patterns are often taken as evidence of fundamental genetic differences between alleged races. However, a growing body of evidence establishes the primacy of social inequalities in the origin and persistence of racial health disparities. Here, I summarize this evidence and argue that the debate over racial inequalities in health presents an opportunity to refine the critique of race in three ways: 1) to reiterate why the race concept is inconsistent with patterns of global human genetic diversity; 2) to refocus attention on the complex, environmental influences on human biology at multiple levels of analysis and across the lifecourse; and 3) to revise the claim that race is a cultural construct and expand research on the sociocultural reality of race and racism. Drawing on recent developments in neighboring disciplines, I present a model for explaining how racial inequality becomes embodied-literally-in the biological well-being of racialized groups and individuals. This model requires a shift in the way we articulate the critique of race as bad biology. 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19226645     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.20983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  97 in total

1.  Methods for the scientific study of discrimination and health: an ecosocial approach.

Authors:  Nancy Krieger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Education, genetic ancestry, and blood pressure in African Americans and Whites.

Authors:  Amy L Non; Clarence C Gravlee; Connie J Mulligan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Inferring genetic ancestry: opportunities, challenges, and implications.

Authors:  Charmaine D Royal; John Novembre; Stephanie M Fullerton; David B Goldstein; Jeffrey C Long; Michael J Bamshad; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 4.  A critical review of racial/ethnic variables in osteoporosis and bone density research.

Authors:  M S Megyesi; L M Hunt; H Brody
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Considering the Role of Stress in Populations of High-Risk, Underserved Community Networks Program Centers.

Authors:  James R Hébert; Kathryn L Braun; Joseph Keawe'aimoku Kaholokula; Cheryl A Armstead; James B Burch; Beti Thompson
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2015

6.  Temporal trends in the black/white breast cancer case ratio for estrogen receptor status: disparities are historically contingent, not innate.

Authors:  Nancy Krieger; Jarvis T Chen; Pamela D Waterman
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 7.  Assessing health risks from multiple environmental stressors: Moving from G×E to I×E.

Authors:  Cliona M McHale; Gwendolyn Osborne; Rachel Morello-Frosch; Andrew G Salmon; Martha S Sandy; Gina Solomon; Luoping Zhang; Martyn T Smith; Lauren Zeise
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 5.657

8.  A Qualitative Analysis of How Anthropologists Interpret the Race Construct.

Authors:  Jayne O Ifekwunigwe; Jennifer K Wagner; Joon-Ho Yu; Tanya M Harrell; Michael J Bamshad; Charmaine D Royal
Journal:  Am Anthropol       Date:  2017-08-14

Review 9.  The contribution of genetic and environmental factors to the duration of pregnancy.

Authors:  Timothy P York; Lindon J Eaves; Michael C Neale; Jerome F Strauss
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Advancing genomic research and reducing health disparities: what can nurse scholars do?

Authors:  Cheedy Jaja; Robert Gibson; Shirley Quarles
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.