Literature DB >> 23452096

Advancing genomic research and reducing health disparities: what can nurse scholars do?

Cheedy Jaja1, Robert Gibson, Shirley Quarles.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Advances in genomic research are improving our understanding of human diseases and evoking promise of an era of genomic medicine. It is unclear whether genomic medicine may exacerbate or attenuate extant racial group health disparities. We delineate how nurse scholars could engage in the configuration of an equitable genomic medicine paradigm. ORGANIZING CONSTRUCT: We identify as legitimate subjects for nursing scholarship the scientific relevance, ethical, and public policy implications for employing racial categories in genomic research in the context of reducing extant health disparities.
FINDINGS: Since genomic research is largely population specific, current classification of genomic data will center on racial and ethnic groups. Nurse scholars should be involved in clarifying how putative racial group differences should be elucidated in light of the current orthodoxy that genomic solutions may alleviate racial health disparities.
CONCLUSIONS: Nurse scholars are capable of employing their expertise in concept analysis to elucidate how race is used as a variable in scientific research, and to use knowledge brokering to delineate how race variables that imply human ancestry could be utilized in genomic research pragmatically in the context of health disparities. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In an era of genomic medicine, nurse scholars should recognize and understand the challenges and complexities of genomics and race and their relevance to health care and health disparities.
© 2013 Sigma Theta Tau International.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23452096      PMCID: PMC3674174          DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2012.01482.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh        ISSN: 1527-6546            Impact factor:   3.176


  55 in total

Review 1.  Why genes don't count (for racial differences in health).

Authors:  A H Goodman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Haplotype variation and linkage disequilibrium in 313 human genes.

Authors:  J C Stephens; J A Schneider; D A Tanguay; J Choi; T Acharya; S E Stanley; R Jiang; C J Messer; A Chew; J H Han; J Duan; J L Carr; M S Lee; B Koshy; A M Kumar; G Zhang; W R Newell; A Windemuth; C Xu; T S Kalbfleisch; S L Shaner; K Arnold; V Schulz; C M Drysdale; K Nandabalan; R S Judson; G Ruano; G F Vovis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-07-12       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Genetic structure of human populations.

Authors:  Noah A Rosenberg; Jonathan K Pritchard; James L Weber; Howard M Cann; Kenneth K Kidd; Lev A Zhivotovsky; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Health disparities: what can nursing do?

Authors:  Gloria R Smith
Journal:  Policy Polit Nurs Pract       Date:  2007-11

Review 5.  Racial disparities in access to care within the cardiac revascularization population.

Authors:  Pamela S Miller
Journal:  J Natl Black Nurses Assoc       Date:  2007-12

6.  Strategies to prepare faculty to integrate genomics into nursing education programs.

Authors:  Janet K Williams; Cynthia A Prows; Yvette P Conley; Julie Eggert; Maggie Kirk; Francine Nichols
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 3.176

Review 7.  The use of racial, ethnic, and ancestral categories in human genetics research.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-08-29       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  The fallacy of racial pharmacogenomics.

Authors:  S D J Pena
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 2.590

Review 9.  Looking for race in all the wrong places: analyzing the lack of productivity in the ongoing debate about race and genetics.

Authors:  Morris W Foster
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites.

Authors:  A M Bowcock; A Ruiz-Linares; J Tomfohrde; E Minch; J R Kidd; L L Cavalli-Sforza
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-03-31       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  3 in total

1.  Risks of nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics? What the scientists say.

Authors:  T Hurlimann; V Menuz; J Graham; J Robitaille; M-C Vohl; B Godard
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 5.523

2.  The Role of the Nurse Scientist as a Knowledge Broker.

Authors:  Marcella Remer Thompson; Donna Schwartz Barcott
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.176

3.  Advocacy and actions to address disparities in access to genomic health care: A report on a National Academies workshop.

Authors:  Janet K Williams; Vence L Bonham; Catherine Wicklund; Bernice Coleman; Jacquelyn Y Taylor; Ann K Cashion
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 3.315

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.