BACKGROUND: Cancer disparities are associated with a broad range of sociocultural determinants of health that operate in community contexts. High-risk populations may be more vulnerable to social and environmental factors that lead to chronic stress. Theoretical and empirical research indicates that exposure to contextual and sociocultural stress alters biological systems, thereby influencing cancer risk, progression, and, ultimately, mortality. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe contextual pathways through which stress likely increases cancer risk in high-risk, underserved populations. METHODS: This review presents a description of the link between contextual stressors and disease risk disparities within underserved communities, with a focus on 1) stress as a proximal link between biological processes, such as cytokine responses, inflammation, and cancer and 2) stress as a distal link to cancer through biobehavioral risk factors such as poor diet, physical inactivity, circadian rhythm or sleep disruption, and substance abuse. These concepts are illustrated through application to populations served by three National Cancer Institute-funded Community Networks Program Centers (CNPCs): African Americans in the Deep South (the South Carolina Cancer Disparities Community Network [SCCDCN]), Native Hawaiians ('Imi Hale-Native Hawaiian Cancer Network), and Latinos in the Lower Yakima Valley of Washington State (The Center for Hispanic Health Promotion: Reducing Cancer Disparities). CONCLUSIONS: Stress experienced by the underserved communities represented in the CNPCs is marked by social, biological, and behavioral pathways that increase cancer risk. A case is presented to increase research on sociocultural determinants of health, stress, and cancer risk among racial/ethnic minorities in underserved communities.
BACKGROUND:Cancer disparities are associated with a broad range of sociocultural determinants of health that operate in community contexts. High-risk populations may be more vulnerable to social and environmental factors that lead to chronic stress. Theoretical and empirical research indicates that exposure to contextual and sociocultural stress alters biological systems, thereby influencing cancer risk, progression, and, ultimately, mortality. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe contextual pathways through which stress likely increases cancer risk in high-risk, underserved populations. METHODS: This review presents a description of the link between contextual stressors and disease risk disparities within underserved communities, with a focus on 1) stress as a proximal link between biological processes, such as cytokine responses, inflammation, and cancer and 2) stress as a distal link to cancer through biobehavioral risk factors such as poor diet, physical inactivity, circadian rhythm or sleep disruption, and substance abuse. These concepts are illustrated through application to populations served by three National Cancer Institute-funded Community Networks Program Centers (CNPCs): African Americans in the Deep South (the South Carolina Cancer Disparities Community Network [SCCDCN]), Native Hawaiians ('Imi Hale-Native Hawaiian Cancer Network), and Latinos in the Lower Yakima Valley of Washington State (The Center for Hispanic Health Promotion: Reducing Cancer Disparities). CONCLUSIONS: Stress experienced by the underserved communities represented in the CNPCs is marked by social, biological, and behavioral pathways that increase cancer risk. A case is presented to increase research on sociocultural determinants of health, stress, and cancer risk among racial/ethnic minorities in underserved communities.
Authors: Joseph Keawe'aimoku Kaholokula; Andrea H Nacapoy; Andrew Grandinetti; Healani K Chang Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-01-17 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: James R Hébert; Michael Wirth; Lisa Davis; Briana Davis; Brook E Harmon; Thomas G Hurley; Ruby Drayton; E Angela Murphy; Nitin Shivappa; Sara Wilcox; Swann A Adams; Heather M Brandt; Christine E Blake; Cheryl A Armstead; Susan E Steck; Steven N Blair Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: James R Hebert; Heather M Brandt; Cheryl A Armstead; Swann A Adams; Susan E Steck Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-03-31 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: J S Litt; K Alaimo; M Buchenau; A Villalobos; D H Glueck; T Crume; L Fahnestock; R F Hamman; J R Hebert; T G Hurley; J Leiferman; K Li Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-03-18 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Lorne J Hofseth; James R Hebert; Anindya Chanda; Hexin Chen; Bryan L Love; Maria M Pena; E Angela Murphy; Mathew Sajish; Amit Sheth; Phillip J Buckhaults; Franklin G Berger Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2020-02-21 Impact factor: 46.802
Authors: Valerie Hruska; Nitin Shivappa; James R Hébert; Alison M Duncan; Jess Haines; David W L Ma Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-04-26 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Yura Lee; Han Chen; Wei Chen; Qibin Qi; Majid Afshar; Jianwen Cai; Martha L Daviglus; Bharat Thyagarajan; Kari E North; Stephanie J London; Eric Boerwinkle; Juan C Celedón; Robert C Kaplan; Bing Yu Journal: Metabolites Date: 2022-04-16
Authors: Elizabeth A Mazzio; Nan Li; David Bauer; Patricia Mendonca; Equar Taka; Mohammed Darb; Leeshawn Thomas; Henry Williams; Karam F A Soliman Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 3.659
Authors: Eduardo Velasco-Mondragon; Angela Jimenez; Anna G Palladino-Davis; Dawn Davis; Jose A Escamilla-Cejudo Journal: Public Health Rev Date: 2016-12-07