Literature DB >> 19223577

Ductal lavage is an inefficient method of biomarker measurement in high-risk women.

Seema A Khan1, Heather A Lankes, Deepa B Patil, Michele Bryk, Nanjiang Hou, David Ivancic, Ritu Nayar, Shahla Masood, Alfred Rademaker.   

Abstract

Effective methods of serial epithelial sampling to measure breast-specific biomarkers will aid the rapid evaluation of new preventive interventions. We report here a proof-of-principle phase 2 study to assess the utility of ductal lavage (DL) to measure biomarkers of tamoxifen action. We enrolled women with a 5-year breast cancer risk estimate >1.6% or the unaffected breast of women with T1a or T1b breast cancer. After entry DL, participants chose tamoxifen or observation and underwent repeat DL 6 months later. Samples were processed for cytology and immunohistochemistry for estrogen receptor alpha, Ki-67, and cyclooxygenase-2. Of 182 women recruited, 115 (63%) underwent entry and repeat DL; 85 (47%) had sufficient cells for analysis from > or =1 duct at both time points; in 78 (43%), cells were sufficient from > or =1 matched ducts. Forty-six women chose observation and 39 chose tamoxifen. We observed greater reductions in the tamoxifen group than in the observation group for Ki-67 (adjusted P = 0.03) and estrogen receptor alpha (adjusted P = 0.07), but not in cyclooxygenase-2 (adjusted P = 0.4) labeling. Cytologic findings showed a trend toward improvement in the tamoxifen group compared with the observation group. Interobserver variability for cytologic diagnosis between two observers showed good agreement (kappa = 0.44). Using DL, we observed the expected changes in tamoxifen-related biomarkers; however, poor reproducibility of biomarkers in the observation group, the 53% attrition rate of subjects from recruitment to biomarker analyses, and the expense of DL are significant barriers to the use of this procedure for biomarker assessment over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19223577      PMCID: PMC2728458          DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)        ISSN: 1940-6215


  24 in total

1.  Reduction in proliferation with six months of letrozole in women on hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  Carol J Fabian; Bruce F Kimler; Carola M Zalles; Qamar J Khan; Matthew S Mayo; Teresa A Phillips; Marie Simonsen; Trina Metheny; Brian K Petroff
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Oral contraceptive (OCP) use increases proliferation and decreases oestrogen receptor content of epithelial cells in the normal human breast.

Authors:  G Williams; E Anderson; A Howell; R Watson; J Coyne; S A Roberts; C S Potten
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1991-05-10       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  A phase II breast cancer chemoprevention trial of oral alpha-difluoromethylornithine: breast tissue, imaging, and serum and urine biomarkers.

Authors:  Carol J Fabian; Bruce F Kimler; Deborah A Brady; Matthew S Mayo; C H Joseph Chang; John A Ferraro; Carola M Zalles; Annette L Stanton; Shahla Masood; William E Grizzle; Norman F Boyd; Dora W Arneson; Karen A Johnson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Short-term breast cancer prediction by random periareolar fine-needle aspiration cytology and the Gail risk model.

Authors:  C J Fabian; B F Kimler; C M Zalles; J R Klemp; S Kamel; S Zeiger; M S Mayo
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-08-02       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.

Authors:  M H Gail; L A Brinton; D P Byar; D K Corle; S B Green; C Schairer; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Ductal lavage findings in women with known breast cancer undergoing mastectomy.

Authors:  Seema A Khan; Elizabeth L Wiley; Norma Rodriguez; Carol Baird; Rathi Ramakrishnan; Ritu Nayar; Michele Bryk; Kevin B Bethke; Valerie L Staradub; Judith Wolfman; Alfred Rademaker; Britt-Marie Ljung; Monica Morrow
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-10-20       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Papanicolaou staining--a review.

Authors:  P N Marshall
Journal:  Microsc Acta       Date:  1983-05

8.  Ductal lavage in patients undergoing mastectomy for mammary carcinoma: a correlative study.

Authors:  Edi Brogi; Mark Robson; Katherine S Panageas; Chiara Casadio; Britt-Marie Ljung; Leslie Montgomery
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Incorporation of clustering effects for the Wilcoxon rank sum test: a large-sample approach.

Authors:  Bernard Rosner; Robert J Glynn; Mei-Ling Ting Lee
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Influence of menstrual cycle, parity and oral contraceptive use on steroid hormone receptors in normal breast.

Authors:  S Battersby; B J Robertson; T J Anderson; R J King; K McPherson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  10 in total

1.  Soy isoflavone supplementation for breast cancer risk reduction: a randomized phase II trial.

Authors:  Seema A Khan; Robert T Chatterton; Nancy Michel; Michelle Bryk; Oukseub Lee; David Ivancic; Richard Heinz; Carola M Zalles; Irene B Helenowski; Borko D Jovanovic; Adrian A Franke; Maarten C Bosland; Jun Wang; Nora M Hansen; Kevin P Bethke; Alexander Dew; Margerie Coomes; Raymond C Bergan
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2012-02

2.  Breast ductal lavage for assessment of breast cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Robert Treat Chatterton; Noah P Parker; Mito Habe-Evans; Michele Bryk; Denise M Scholtens; Seema A Khan
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.869

3.  Selective release of microRNA species from normal and malignant mammary epithelial cells.

Authors:  Lucy Pigati; Sree C S Yaddanapudi; Ravi Iyengar; Dong-Ja Kim; Steven A Hearn; David Danforth; Michelle L Hastings; Dominik M Duelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Status of Intraductal Therapy for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.

Authors:  Meghan Flanagan; Susan Love; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2010-05-06

Review 5.  Mammary ductoscopy in the current management of breast disease.

Authors:  Sarah S K Tang; Dominique J Twelves; Clare M Isacke; Gerald P H Gui
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Does ductal lavage assert its role as a noninvasive diagnostic modality to identify women at low risk of breast cancer development?

Authors:  Ioanna Konstandiadou; Aikaterini Mastoraki; Olympia Kotsilianou; Petros Karakitsos; George Athanasas; Vasilios Smyrniotis; Nikolaos Arkadopoulos
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 4.401

7.  Comparison of Random Periareolar Fine Needle Aspirate versus Ductal Lavage for Risk Assessment and Prevention of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Abigail Hoffman; Rod Pellenberg; Catherine Ibarra Drendall; Victoria Seewaldt
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2012-06-22

8.  Clinical trial design for testing the stem cell model for the prevention and treatment of cancer.

Authors:  Rishindra M Reddy; Madhuri Kakarala; Max S Wicha
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Examination of Duct Physiology in the Human Mammary Gland.

Authors:  Dixie Mills; Ameer Gomberawalla; Eva J Gordon; Julie Tondre; Mitra Nejad; Tinh Nguyen; Janice M Pogoda; Jianyu Rao; Robert Chatterton; Susanne Henning; Susan M Love
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Evaluation of nipple aspirate fluid as a diagnostic tool for early detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  Sadr-Ul Shaheed; Catherine Tait; Kyriacos Kyriacou; Richard Linforth; Mohamed Salhab; Chris Sutton
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.988

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.