Literature DB >> 17221152

Reduction in proliferation with six months of letrozole in women on hormone replacement therapy.

Carol J Fabian1, Bruce F Kimler, Carola M Zalles, Qamar J Khan, Matthew S Mayo, Teresa A Phillips, Marie Simonsen, Trina Metheny, Brian K Petroff.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine if 6 months of the aromatase inhibitor letrozole, administered to postmenopausal women taking a stable dose of hormone replacement remedy, would be safe and would modulate biomarkers of breast cancer risk. The intent was to reduce the proliferation marker Ki-67 while maintaining adequate systemic levels of estradiol so as to avoid perimenopausal symptoms. Postmenopausal women at high risk for development of breast cancer and taking a stable dose of estrogen or estrogen plus progestin were screened by random periareolar fine needle aspiration (RPFNA). To be eligible, the acquired breast epithelial cells had to be characterized as cytologic atypia or borderline atypia with > or =1,000 epithelial cells on the cytomorphology slide; plus > or =500 epithelial cells on a slide processed for Ki-67 immunocytochemistry. Forty-two women were enrolled in the one arm study and received 2.5 mg letrozole per day for 6 months, followed by repeat assessment of biomarkers. Ki-67 was reduced by a median relative value of 66%. There was no significant change in breast cell cytomorphology; ER weighted index score; serum estradiol, testosterone, or IGF-1:IGFBP-3 ratio; mammographic breast density, or frequency or severity of perimenopausal symptoms. Given the dramatic reduction in proliferation, the effect of letrozole on risk and response biomarkers should be explored further in a randomized, placebo-controlled Phase IIB breast cancer chemoprevention trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17221152     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-006-9476-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  24 in total

1.  Aromatase immunoreactivity is increased in mammographically dense regions of the breast.

Authors:  Celine M Vachon; Hironobu Sasano; Karthik Ghosh; Kathleen R Brandt; David A Watson; Carol Reynolds; Wilma L Lingle; Paul E Goss; Rong Li; Sarah E Aiyar; Christopher G Scott; V Shane Pankratz; Richard J Santen; James N Ingle
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Reduction in Ki-67 in benign breast tissue of high-risk women with the lignan secoisolariciresinol diglycoside.

Authors:  Carol J Fabian; Bruce F Kimler; Carola M Zalles; Jennifer R Klemp; Brian K Petroff; Qamar J Khan; Priyanka Sharma; Kenneth D R Setchell; Xueheng Zhao; Teresa A Phillips; Trina Metheny; Jennifer R Hughes; Hung-Wen Yeh; Karen A Johnson
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-08-19

3.  Mammographic density change with 1 year of aerobic exercise among postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Christy G Woolcott; Kerry S Courneya; Norman F Boyd; Martin J Yaffe; Tim Terry; Anne McTiernan; Rollin Brant; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Melinda L Irwin; Charlotte A Jones; Sony Brar; Kristin L Campbell; Margaret L McNeely; Kristina H Karvinen; Christine M Friedenreich
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Longitudinal Changes in Volumetric Breast Density with Tamoxifen and Aromatase Inhibitors.

Authors:  Natalie J Engmann; Christopher G Scott; Matthew R Jensen; Lin Ma; Kathleen R Brandt; Amir Pasha Mahmoudzadeh; Serghei Malkov; Dana H Whaley; Carrie B Hruska; Fang Fang Wu; Stacey J Winham; Diana L Miglioretti; Aaron D Norman; John J Heine; John Shepherd; V Shane Pankratz; Celine M Vachon; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Use of Biomarker Modulation in Normal Mammary Epithelium as a Correlate for Efficacy of Chemopreventive Agents Against Chemically Induced Cancers.

Authors:  Ronald A Lubet; Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard; Jennifer T Fox; Fariba Moeinpour; M Margaret Juliana; Robert H Shoemaker; Clinton J Grubbs
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2019-12-23

6.  Exemestane Use in Postmenopausal Women at High Risk for Invasive Breast Cancer: Evaluating Biomarkers of Efficacy and Safety.

Authors:  Margaret E Gatti-Mays; David Venzon; Claudia E Galbo; Andrea Singer; James Reynolds; Erini Makariou; Bhaskar Kallakury; Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard; Larissa Korde; Claudine Isaacs; Robert Warren; Ann Gallagher; Jennifer Eng-Wong
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2016-01-12

Review 7.  Phase II cancer prevention clinical trials.

Authors:  Eva Szabo
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 8.  Mechanisms of estrogen receptor-α upregulation in breast cancers.

Authors:  Yasuo Miyoshi; Keiko Murase; Masaru Saito; Michiko Imamura; Koushi Oh
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.309

9.  Relationship Between Breast Density and Selective Estrogen-Receptor Modulators, Aromatase Inhibitors, Physical Activity, and Diet: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ernest U Ekpo; Patrick C Brennan; Claudia Mello-Thoms; Mark F McEntee
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.279

10.  Ductal lavage is an inefficient method of biomarker measurement in high-risk women.

Authors:  Seema A Khan; Heather A Lankes; Deepa B Patil; Michele Bryk; Nanjiang Hou; David Ivancic; Ritu Nayar; Shahla Masood; Alfred Rademaker
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2009-02-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.