Literature DB >> 21170661

Mammary ductoscopy in the current management of breast disease.

Sarah S K Tang1, Dominique J Twelves, Clare M Isacke, Gerald P H Gui.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The majority of benign and malignant lesions of the breast are thought to arise from the epithelium of the terminal duct-lobular unit (TDLU). Although modern mammography, ultrasound, and MRI have improved diagnosis, a final pathological diagnosis currently relies on percutaneous methods of sampling breast lesions. The advantage of mammary ductoscopy (MD) is that it is possible to gain direct access to the ductal system via the nipple. Direct visualization of the duct epithelium allows the operator to precisely locate intraductal lesions, enabling accurate tissue sampling and providing guidance to the surgeon during excision. The intraductal approach may also have a role in screening individuals who are at high risk of breast cancer. Finally, in spontaneous nipple discharge (SND), as biopsy instruments improve and intraductal therapeutics, such as intraductal excision and laser ablation, become a possibility, normal or benign ductoscopic findings may help minimize surgery in selected patients. As MD technology is rapidly advancing, a comprehensive review of current practice will be a valuable guide for clinicians involved in the management of breast disease.
METHODS: This is a review of current ductoscopic practice based on an exhaustive literature search of Pubmed, Google Scholar, and conference proceedings. The search terms "ductoscopy", "duct endoscopy", "mammary", "breast," and "intraductal" were used. RESULTS/
CONCLUSIONS: Duct endoscopes have become smaller in diameter with working channels and improved optical definition. Currently, the role of MD is best defined in the management of SND facilitating targeted surgical excision, potentially avoiding unnecessary surgery, and limiting the extent of surgical resection for benign disease. The role of MD in breast-cancer screening and breast conservation surgery has yet to be fully defined. Few prospective randomized trials exist in the literature, and these would be crucial to validate current opinion, not only in the benign setting but also in breast oncologic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21170661     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1465-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  38 in total

1.  Identification of breast cancer in patients with pathologic nipple discharge: does ductoscopy predict malignancy?

Authors:  Lana D Louie; Joseph P Crowe; Andrea E Dawson; Katherine B Lee; Deborah L Baynes; Tami Dowdy; Julian A Kim
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 2.  Ductoscopy-assisted microdochectomy.

Authors:  Pedro F Escobar; Deborah Baynes; Joseph P Crowe
Journal:  Int J Fertil Womens Med       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct

3.  Breast duct anatomy in the human nipple: three-dimensional patterns and clinical implications.

Authors:  Jennifer E Rusby; Elena F Brachtel; James S Michaelson; Frederick C Koerner; Barbara L Smith
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Reproducibility of cytologic atypia in repeat nipple duct lavage.

Authors:  April Johnson-Maddux; Raheela Ashfaq; Leslie Cler; Elizabeth Naftalis; Ann Marilyn Leitch; Susan Hoover; David M Euhus
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography.

Authors:  K Kerlikowske; D Grady; J Barclay; E A Sickles; V Ernster
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-07-03       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Scarless endoscopic papillomectomy of the breast.

Authors:  Omer Bender; Fatih Levent Balci; Enis Yüney; Hasan Akbulut
Journal:  Onkologie       Date:  2009-02-13

7.  The use of ductal lavage as a screening tool in women at high risk for developing breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Catherine D Carruthers; Lori A Chapleskie; Mary Beth Flynn; Thomas G Frazier
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 8.  Radiation risk from screening mammography of women aged 40-49 years.

Authors:  S A Feig; R E Hendrick
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1997

9.  The role and limitations of mammary ductoscope in management of pathologic nipple discharge.

Authors:  Adel Denewer; Khalil El-Etribi; Nadia Nada; Mohamed El-Metwally
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 2.431

10.  Hypermethylated genes as biomarkers of cancer in women with pathologic nipple discharge.

Authors:  Mary Jo Fackler; Aeisha Rivers; Wei Wen Teo; Amrit Mangat; Evangeline Taylor; Zhe Zhang; Steve Goodman; Pedram Argani; Ritu Nayar; Barbara Susnik; Saraswati Sukumar; Seema A Khan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  [Value of galactography for the diagnostic work-up of pathological nipple discharge in multimodal breast diagnostics. Part 2: a systematic review of the literature].

Authors:  K Scheurlen; A Schnitzer; J Krammer; C Kaiser; S O Schönberg; K Wasser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Exploring breast with therapeutic ductoscopy.

Authors:  Fatih Levent Balci; Sheldon Marc Feldman
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2014-05

3.  Detection of breast cancer precursor lesions by autofluorescence ductoscopy.

Authors:  Laurien Waaijer; Mando D Filipe; Janine Simons; Carmen C van der Pol; Tjeerd de Boorder; Paul J van Diest; Arjen Joost Witkamp
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 4.239

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.