Literature DB >> 12374678

A phase II breast cancer chemoprevention trial of oral alpha-difluoromethylornithine: breast tissue, imaging, and serum and urine biomarkers.

Carol J Fabian1, Bruce F Kimler, Deborah A Brady, Matthew S Mayo, C H Joseph Chang, John A Ferraro, Carola M Zalles, Annette L Stanton, Shahla Masood, William E Grizzle, Norman F Boyd, Dora W Arneson, Karen A Johnson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A double-blind randomized Phase II chemoprevention trial of alpha-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) was conducted in a group of women at high risk for development of breast cancer. DFMO is an irreversible inhibitor of ornithine decarboxylase, the limiting enzyme of polyamine synthesis that is often up-regulated in breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Study entrants were required to have random periareolar fine-needle aspiration cytology prior to entry that exhibited hyperplasia or hyperplasia with atypia, as well as a mammogram and clinical breast exam judged as not suspicious for breast cancer and no clinical hearing loss. Subjects were randomized to 6 months of oral DFMO (0.5 g/m(2)/day) or placebo, followed by repeat fine-needle aspiration and biomarker assessment. The main study end point was an improvement in cytologic pattern.
RESULTS: Of 119 subjects entered, 96% completed the study and were evaluable for the main study end point. A modest reduction (28%) in average total urine polyamines was obtained in the DFMO group, but there was no reduction in the spermidine:spermine ratio. There was no difference in cytologic improvement between DFMO and placebo. Likewise, there was no difference between DFMO and placebo for the secondary end points of breast molecular marker changes (immunocytochemical expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen, p53, and epidermal growth factor receptor), mammographic breast density, serum insulin-like growth factor I: insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 ratio, adverse events, quality of life indices, or subsequent cancer development.
CONCLUSIONS: DFMO at a dose level of 0.5 g/m(2)/day administered for 6 months does not modulate breast risk biomarkers tested in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12374678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  30 in total

Review 1.  Novel agents for chemoprevention, screening methods, and sampling issues.

Authors:  Mary Jo Fackler; Ella Evron; Seema A Khan; Saraswati Sukumar
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 2.  DFMO: targeted risk reduction therapy for colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Christina M Laukaitis; Eugene W Gerner
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.043

3.  Patient satisfaction of BRCA1/2 genetic testing by women at high risk for breast cancer participating in a prevention trial.

Authors:  Jennifer R Klemp; Anne O'Dea; Carolyn Chamberlain; Carol J Fabian
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 4.  Phase II cancer prevention clinical trials.

Authors:  Eva Szabo
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.929

5.  Inhibitors of polyamine biosynthesis decrease the expression of the metalloproteases meprin alpha and MMP-7 in hormone-independent human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Gail L Matters; Andrea Manni; Judith S Bond
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.150

6.  Pilot and feasibility study: prospective proteomic profiling of mammary epithelial cells from high-risk women provides evidence of activation of pro-survival pathways.

Authors:  Catherine Ibarra-Drendall; Michelle M Troch; William T Barry; Gloria Broadwater; Emanuel F Petricoin; Julia Wulfkuhle; Lance A Liotta; Siya Lem; Joseph C Baker; Anne C Ford; Lee G Wilke; Carola Zalles; Nicole M Kuderer; Abigail W Hoffman; Melanie Shivraj; Priya Mehta; Jamila Williams; Nora Tolbert; Laurie W Lee; Patrick G Pilie; Dihua Yu; Victoria L Seewaldt
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Difluoromethylornithine: the proof is in the polyamines.

Authors:  Joanne M Jeter; David S Alberts
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2012-12

8.  A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 skin cancer prevention study of {alpha}-difluoromethylornithine in subjects with previous history of skin cancer.

Authors:  Howard H Bailey; KyungMann Kim; Ajit K Verma; Karen Sielaff; Paul O Larson; Stephen Snow; Theresa Lenaghan; Jaye L Viner; Jeff Douglas; Nancy E Dreckschmidt; Mary Hamielec; Marcy Pomplun; Harry H Sharata; David Puchalsky; Eric R Berg; Thomas C Havighurst; Paul P Carbone
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-01

9.  ESR1 promoter hypermethylation does not predict atypia in RPFNA nor persistent atypia after 12 months tamoxifen chemoprevention.

Authors:  Joseph C Baker; Julie H Ostrander; Siya Lem; Gloria Broadwater; Gregory R Bean; Nicholas C D'Amato; Vanessa K Goldenberg; Craig Rowell; Catherine Ibarra-Drendall; Tracey Grant; Patrick G Pilie; Shauna N Vasilatos; Michelle M Troch; Victoria Scott; Lee G Wilke; Carolyn Paisie; Sarah M Rabiner; Alejandro Torres-Hernandez; Carola M Zalles; Victoria L Seewaldt
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Reproducibility of random periareolar fine needle aspiration in a multi-institutional Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Catherine Ibarra-Drendall; Lee G Wilke; Carola Zalles; Victoria Scott; Laura E Archer; Siya Lem; Lisa D Yee; Joanne Lester; Swati Kulkarni; Christine Murekeyisoni; Marie Wood; Karen Wilson; Judy Garber; Carleen Gentry; April Stouder; Gloria Broadwater; Joseph C Baker; Shauna N Vasilatos; Elizabeth Owens; Sarah Rabiner; Abbey C Barron; Victoria L Seewaldt
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.