Literature DB >> 24138405

Modelling response selection in task switching: testing the contingent encoding assumption.

Darryl W Schneider1, Gordon D Logan.   

Abstract

The contingent encoding assumption is the idea that response selection in task-switching situations does not begin until the cue and the target have both been encoded. The authors tested the assumption by manipulating response congruency, stimulus order, and stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) in two experiments. They found evidence of response selection prior to cue encoding for congruent targets with target-cue order at a long SOA, indicating that the contingent encoding assumption is invalid. The authors describe how contingent encoding can be removed from an existing task-switching model by introducing baseline evidence--task-neutral evidence that serves as a baseline for response selection prior to stimulus encoding. Simulations revealed that the modified model could reproduce the full pattern of response time data and generate responses prior to cue encoding. The authors conclude by discussing directions for further model development.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive modelling; Response congruency; Response selection; Stimulus order; Task switching

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24138405      PMCID: PMC4315513          DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.843009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  37 in total

1.  Effects of similarity and practice on speeded classification response times and accuracies: further tests of an exemplar-retrieval model.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; L A Alfonso-Reese
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

Review 2.  An instance theory of attention and memory.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  The target of task switching.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2010-06

4.  Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-08

5.  Task-switching performance with 1:1 and 2:1 cue-task mappings: not so different after all.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; T J Palmeri
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  The cuing and priming of cognitive operations.

Authors:  P Sudevan; D A Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  A memory-based model of Hick's law.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; John R Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Selecting a response in task switching: testing a model of compound cue retrieval.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  The role of task rules and stimulus-response mappings in the task switching paradigm.

Authors:  Gesine Dreisbach; Thomas Goschke; Hilde Haider
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-01-06
View more
  2 in total

1.  Learning a nonmediated route for response selection in task switching.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-08

2.  Exploring the Limitations of the Shielding Function of Categorization Rules in Task-Switching.

Authors:  Dong Guo; Bingxin Li; Yun Yu; Xuhong Liu; Xiangqian Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-05-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.