Literature DB >> 29256098

Bayesian active probabilistic classification for psychometric field estimation.

Xinyu D Song1, Kiron A Sukesan1, Dennis L Barbour2.   

Abstract

Psychometric functions are typically estimated by fitting a parametric model to categorical subject responses. Procedures to estimate unidimensional psychometric functions (i.e., psychometric curves) have been subjected to the most research, with modern adaptive methods capable of quickly obtaining accurate estimates. These capabilities have been extended to some multidimensional psychometric functions (i.e., psychometric fields) that are easily parameterizable, but flexible procedures for general psychometric field estimation are lacking. This study introduces a nonparametric Bayesian psychometric field estimator operating on subject queries sequentially selected to improve the estimate in some targeted way. This estimator implements probabilistic classification using Gaussian processes trained by active learning. The accuracy and efficiency of two different actively sampled estimators were compared to two non-actively sampled estimators for simulations of one of the simplest psychometric fields in common use: the pure-tone audiogram. The actively sampled methods achieved estimate accuracy equivalent to the non-actively sampled methods with fewer observations. This trend held for a variety of audiogram phenotypes representative of the range of human auditory perception. Gaussian process classification is a general estimation procedure capable of extending to multiple input variables and response classes. Its success with a two-dimensional psychometric field informed by binary subject responses holds great promise for extension to complex perceptual models currently inaccessible to practical estimation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Audition; Psychoacoustics; Psychometrics/testing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29256098      PMCID: PMC5839980          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-017-1460-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  35 in total

1.  Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: a commentary.

Authors:  S A Klein
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

2.  Classification of audiograms by sequential testing using a dynamic Bayesian procedure.

Authors:  O Ozdamar; R E Eilers; E Miskiel; J Widen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Hearing assessment-reliability, accuracy, and efficiency of automated audiometry.

Authors:  De Wet Swanepoel; Shadrack Mngemane; Silindile Molemong; Hilda Mkwanazi; Sizwe Tutshini
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.536

4.  Bayesian inference for psychometric functions.

Authors:  Malte Kuss; Frank Jäkel; Felix A Wichmann
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-05-27       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the auditory filter.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Psychometric function estimation by probabilistic classification.

Authors:  Xinyu D Song; Roman Garnett; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Psychometric functions for children's detection of tones in noise.

Authors:  P Allen; F Wightman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-02

8.  Maximum likelihood estimation: the best PEST.

Authors:  A Pentland
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-10

9.  Fast, Continuous Audiogram Estimation Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Xinyu D Song; Brittany M Wallace; Jacob R Gardner; Noah M Ledbetter; Kilian Q Weinberger; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Infant psychometric functions for detection: mechanisms of immature sensitivity.

Authors:  J Y Bargones; L A Werner; G C Marean
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  3 in total

1.  Conjoint psychometric field estimation for bilateral audiometry.

Authors:  Dennis L Barbour; James C DiLorenzo; Kiron A Sukesan; Xinyu D Song; Jeff Y Chen; Eleanor A Degen; Katherine L Heisey; Roman Garnett
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-06

2.  Online Machine Learning Audiometry.

Authors:  Dennis L Barbour; Rebecca T Howard; Xinyu D Song; Nikki Metzger; Kiron A Sukesan; James C DiLorenzo; Braham R D Snyder; Jeff Y Chen; Eleanor A Degen; Jenna M Buchbinder; Katherine L Heisey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  A Hearing-Model-Based Active-Learning Test for the Determination of Dead Regions.

Authors:  Josef Schlittenlacher; Richard E Turner; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.