Literature DB >> 10615694

Effects of frequency and duration on psychometric functions for detection of increments and decrements in sinusoids in noise.

B C Moore1, R W Peters, B R Glasberg.   

Abstract

Psychometric functions for detecting increments or decrements in level of sinusoidal pedestals were measured for increment and decrement durations of 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, and 200 ms and for frequencies of 250, 1000, and 4000 Hz. The sinusoids were presented in background noise intended to mask spectral splatter. A three-interval, three-alternative procedure was used. The results indicated that, for increments, the detectability index d' was approximately proportional to delta I/I. For decrements, d' was approximately proportional to delta L. The slopes of the psychometric functions increased (indicating better performance) with increasing frequency for both increments and decrements. For increments, the slopes increased with increasing increment duration up to 200 ms at 250 and 1000 Hz, but at 4000 Hz they increased only up to 50 ms. For decrements, the slopes increased for durations up to 50 ms, and then remained roughly constant, for all frequencies. For a center frequency of 250 Hz, the slopes of the psychometric functions for increment detection increased with duration more rapidly than predicted by a "multiple-looks" hypothesis, i.e., more rapidly than the square root of duration, for durations up to 50 ms. For center frequencies of 1000 and 4000 Hz, the slopes increased less rapidly than predicted by a multiple-looks hypothesis, for durations greater than about 20 ms. The slopes of the psychometric functions for decrement detection increased with decrement duration at a rate slightly greater than the square root of duration, for durations up to 50 ms, at all three frequencies. For greater durations, the increase in slope was less than proportional to the square root of duration. The results were analyzed using a model incorporating a simulated auditory filter, a compressive nonlinearity, a sliding temporal integrator, and a decision device based on a template mechanism. The model took into account the effects of both the external noise and an assumed internal noise. The model was able to account for the major features of the data for both increment and decrement detection.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10615694     DOI: 10.1121/1.428207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  The effect of narrow-band noise maskers on increment detection.

Authors:  Jessica J Messersmith; Harisadhan Patra; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of external noise on detection of intensity increments.

Authors:  Walt Jesteadt; Kim S Schairer; Lance Nizami; Samar Khaddam; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Relative effects of increment and pedestal duration on the detection of intensity increments.

Authors:  Daniel L Valente; Harisadhan Patra; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Factors affecting the processing of intensity in school-aged children.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Effect of Selective Carboplatin-Induced Inner Hair Cell Loss on Temporal Integration in Chinchillas.

Authors:  Monica Trevino; Celia D Escabi; Andie Zang; Karen Pawlowski; Edward Lobarinas
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-04-04

6.  Psychometric functions for pure tone intensity discrimination: slope differences in school-aged children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Detection of appearing and disappearing objects in complex acoustic scenes.

Authors:  Francisco Cervantes Constantino; Leyla Pinggera; Supathum Paranamana; Makio Kashino; Maria Chait
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Factors limiting performance in a multitone intensity-discrimination task: disentangling non-optimal decision weights and increased internal noise.

Authors:  Daniel Oberfeld; Martha Kuta; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.