Literature DB >> 19206821

Recognition of spectrally degraded phonemes by younger, middle-aged, and older normal-hearing listeners.

Kara C Schvartz1, Monita Chatterjee, Sandra Gordon-Salant.   

Abstract

The effects of spectral degradation on vowel and consonant recognition abilities were measured in young, middle-aged, and older normal-hearing (NH) listeners. Noise-band vocoding techniques were used to manipulate the number of spectral channels and frequency-to-place alignment, thereby simulating cochlear implant (CI) processing. A brief cognitive test battery was also administered. The performance of younger NH listeners exceeded that of the middle-aged and older listeners, when stimuli were severely distorted (spectrally shifted); the older listeners performed only slightly worse than the middle-aged listeners. Significant intragroup variability was present in the middle-aged and older groups. A hierarchical multiple-regression analysis including data from all three age groups suggested that age was the primary factor related to shifted vowel recognition performance, but verbal memory abilities also contributed significantly to performance. A second regression analysis (within the middle-aged and older groups alone) revealed that verbal memory and speed of processing abilities were better predictors of performance than age alone. The overall results from the current investigation suggested that both chronological age and cognitive capacities contributed to the ability to recognize spectrally degraded phonemes. Such findings have important implications for the counseling and rehabilitation of adult CI recipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19206821      PMCID: PMC2662854          DOI: 10.1121/1.2997434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  74 in total

1.  Speech recognition with altered spectral distribution of envelope cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; J Wygonski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The contribution of amplitude envelope cues to sentence identification in young and aged listeners.

Authors:  P E Souza; V Kitch
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria.

Authors:  J T Rubinstein; W S Parkinson; R S Tyler; B J Gantz
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1999-07

4.  Relationships among age-related differences in gap detection and word recognition.

Authors:  K B Snell; D R Frisina
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Benefits of cochlear implantation in elderly patients.

Authors:  Y J Shin; B Fraysse; O Deguine; O Valès; M L Laborde; D Bouccara; O Sterkers; A Uziel
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Speech recognition with reduced spectral cues as a function of age.

Authors:  L S Eisenberg; R V Shannon; A S Martinez; J Wygonski; A Boothroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  S Rosen; A Faulkner; L Wilkinson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Working memory in deaf children with cochlear implants: correlations between digit span and measures of spoken language processing.

Authors:  D B Pisoni; A E Geers
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2000-12

9.  Recognition of spectrally degraded and frequency-shifted vowels in acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  Aging and measures of processing speed.

Authors:  T A Salthouse
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.251

View more
  43 in total

1.  Influence of pitch, timbre and timing cues on melodic contour identification with a competing masker (L).

Authors:  Meimei Zhu; Bing Chen; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Caili Ji; John J Galvin; Yi-ping Chang; Anting Xu; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Robust Neuronal Discrimination in Primary Auditory Cortex Despite Degradations of Spectro-temporal Acoustic Details: Comparison Between Guinea Pigs with Normal Hearing and Mild Age-Related Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Yonane Aushana; Samira Souffi; Jean-Marc Edeline; Christian Lorenzi; Chloé Huetz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-04

4.  Integrating cognitive and peripheral factors in predicting hearing-aid processing effectiveness.

Authors:  James M Kates; Kathryn H Arehart; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of age and hearing loss on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Robert Risley; Brian Gygi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech Rate Normalization and Phonemic Boundary Perception in Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Brittany N Jaekel; Rochelle S Newman; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Performance variability on perceptual discrimination tasks in profoundly deaf adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Marcia J Hay-McCutcheon; Nathaniel R Peterson; David B Pisoni; Karen Iler Kirk; Xin Yang; Jason Parton
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.288

8.  Vowel discrimination by hearing infants as a function of number of spectral channels.

Authors:  Andrea D Warner-Czyz; Derek M Houston; Linda S Hynan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Age-Related Differences in the Processing of Temporal Envelope and Spectral Cues in a Speech Segment.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Casey R Gaskins; Maureen J Shader; Erin P Walter; Samira Anderson; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Stimulus and listener factors affecting age-related changes in competing speech perception.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.