Literature DB >> 19195131

Treatment protocols to reduce renal injury during shock wave lithotripsy.

James A McAteer1, Andrew P Evan, James C Williams, James E Lingeman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Growing concern over the acute and long-term adverse effects associated with shock wave lithotripsy calls for treatment strategies to reduce renal injury and improve the efficiency of stone breakage in shock wave lithotripsy. RECENT
FINDINGS: Experimental studies in the pig model show that lithotripter settings for power and shock wave rate and the sequence of shock wave delivery can be used to reduce trauma to the kidney. Step-wise power ramping as is often used to acclimate the patient to shock waves causes less tissue trauma when the initial dose is followed by a brief (3-4 min) pause in shock wave delivery. Slowing the firing rate of the lithotripter to 60 shock waves/min or slower is also effective in reducing renal injury and has the added benefit of improving stone breakage outcomes. Neither strategy to reduce renal injury -- not power ramping with 'pause-protection' nor delivering shock waves at reduced shock wave rate --- have been tested in clinical trials.
SUMMARY: Technique in lithotripsy is critically important, and it is encouraging that simple, practical steps can be taken to improve the safety and efficacy of shock wave lithotripsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19195131      PMCID: PMC3755614          DOI: 10.1097/mou.0b013e32831e16e3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  25 in total

1.  The effect of treatment strategy on stone comminution efficiency in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Yufeng Zhou; Franklin H Cocks; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Renal trauma and the risk of long-term complications in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  A P Evan; L R Willis; J E Lingeman; J A McAteer
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.847

3.  Slow versus fast shock wave lithotripsy rate for urolithiasis: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Khaled Madbouly; Abdel Moneim El-Tiraifi; Mohamed Seida; Salah R El-Faqih; Ramiz Atassi; Riyadh F Talic
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Temporal effects of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  J S Morris; D A Husmann; W T Wilson; G M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Shockwave lithotripsy: dose-related effects on renal structure, hemodynamics, and tubular function.

Authors:  Lynn R Willis; Andrew P Evan; Bret A Connors; Youzhi Shao; Philip M Blomgren; J Howard Pratt; Naomi S Fineberg; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  The effect of discharge voltage on renal injury and impairment caused by lithotripsy in the pig.

Authors:  Bret A Connors; Andrew P Evan; Lynn R Willis; Philip M Blomgren; James E Lingeman; Naomi S Fineberg
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 10.121

7.  Clinical implications of abundant calcium phosphate in routinely analyzed kidney stones.

Authors:  Joan H Parks; Elaine M Worcester; Fredric L Coe; Andrew P Evan; James E Lingeman
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 10.612

8.  Pathologic effects of ESWL on canine renal tissue.

Authors:  R Newman; R Hackett; D Senior; K Brock; J Feldman; J Sosnowski; B Finlayson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Pretreatment with low-energy shock waves induces renal vasoconstriction during standard shock wave lithotripsy (SWL): a treatment protocol known to reduce SWL-induced renal injury.

Authors:  Rajash K Handa; Michael R Bailey; Marla Paun; Sujuan Gao; Bret A Connors; Lynn R Willis; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Low energy lithotripsy with the Lithostar: treatment results with 19,962 renal and ureteral calculi.

Authors:  T B Mobley; D A Myers; W B Grine; J M Jenkins; W R Jordan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Aspects on how extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy should be carried out in order to be maximally effective.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Christian G Chaussy
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-06-27

2.  Best of the AUA Annual Meeting: Highlights From the 2010 American Urological Association Meeting, May 29-June 3, 2010, San Francisco, CA.

Authors:  J Curtis Nickel; Akira Furuta; Michael B Chancellor; Claus G Roehrborn; Dean G Assimos; Ellen Shapiro; Michael K Brawer
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2010

3.  Adjuncts to improve outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Peter L Steinberg; Steven Williams; David M Hoenig
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  CUA Guideline: Management of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Michael Ordon; Sero Andonian; Brian Blew; Trevor Schuler; Ben Chew; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Shock-induced bubble jetting into a viscous fluid with application to tissue injury in shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  J B Freund; R K Shukla; A P Evan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Acute and chronic kidney injury in nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Xiaojing Tang; John C Lieske
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Effect of shock wave number on renal oxidative stress and inflammation.

Authors:  Daniel L Clark; Bret A Connors; Andrew P Evan; Rajash K Handa; Sujuan Gao
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 8.  Recent advances in lithotripsy technology and treatment strategies: A systematic review update.

Authors:  H E Elmansy; J E Lingeman
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 9.  Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique.

Authors:  James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; Ehud Gnessin; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Effect of high shock number on acute complication development after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Miriam Hadj-Moussa; James A Brown
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 2.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.