Literature DB >> 23537270

Effect of high shock number on acute complication development after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.

Miriam Hadj-Moussa1, James A Brown.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed whether high shock number is associated with higher rates of acute complication development after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 372 patients who underwent 436 SWL procedures at 24 kV using a Medstone STS-T lithotripter (Medstone International Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA) was conducted. Complications occurred within 4 weeks of SWL. Treatments were split into three cohorts based on shock number (<2400, 2401-4000, and >4000). Postoperative sequelae of patients who were stone free and those with residual stone were studied separately. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate the relationship between shock number cohort and postoperative complication development.
RESULTS: SWL treatments recorded for each cohort were 158 (37.4%), 145 (34.4%), and 119 (28.2%), respectively. The short-term complication rate when SWL was successful was 8.3% overall. Complication rate for each cohort was 9.5% (11), 7.8% (5), and 7.2% (7), respectively. When SWL was successful, statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between complication rates and shock number cohort (P=0.63). Complications in patients with a residual stone occurred after 41.4% of treatments and trended upward with shock number cohort, but did not reach statistical significance (P=0.84).
CONCLUSIONS: At high voltage, high shock number was not shown to cause higher rates of short-term postoperative complications, as experienced by patients, when SWL was successful or resulted in a residual stone, yet complication rates associated with residual stone burden were approximately five times as common. Forgoing a higher shock number in the presence of a residual stone may therefore increase the risks of sequelae immediately after SWL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23537270      PMCID: PMC3852342          DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  19 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines on urolithiasis.

Authors:  H G Tiselius; D Ackermann; P Alken; C Buck; P Conort; M Gallucci
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 2.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy 25 years later: complications and their prevention.

Authors:  Andreas Skolarikos; Gerasimos Alivizatos; Jean de la Rosette
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 3.  Renal trauma and the risk of long-term complications in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  A P Evan; L R Willis; J E Lingeman; J A McAteer
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.847

4.  Predictors of clinical significance of residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones.

Authors:  Ahmed R El-Nahas; Ahmed M El-Assmy; Khaled Madbouly; Khaled Z Sheir
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Reducing shock number dramatically decreases lesion size in a juvenile kidney model.

Authors:  Bret A Connors; Andrew P Evan; Philip M Blomgren; Lynn R Willis; Rajash K Handa; David A Lifshitz; James E Lingeman; Jun Ying
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Shockwave lithotripsy: dose-related effects on renal structure, hemodynamics, and tubular function.

Authors:  Lynn R Willis; Andrew P Evan; Bret A Connors; Youzhi Shao; Philip M Blomgren; J Howard Pratt; Naomi S Fineberg; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 7.  Experimental basis of shockwave-induced renal trauma in the model of the canine kidney.

Authors:  J Rassweiler; K U Köhrmann; W Back; S Fröhner; M Raab; A Weber; F Kahmann; E Marlinghaus; K P Jünemann; P Alken
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on renal function in patients with kidney stone disease.

Authors:  A Rutz-Danielczak; D Pupek-Musialik; B Raszeja-Wanic
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.847

9.  A randomized controlled trial to assess the incidence of new onset hypertension in patients after shock wave lithotripsy for asymptomatic renal calculi.

Authors:  M A Jewett; C Bombardier; A G Logan; K E Psihramis; T Wesley-James; J E Mahoney; J J Luymes; D Ibañez; M R Ryan; R J Honey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Complications of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary stones: to know and to manage them-a review.

Authors:  Alessandro D'Addessi; Matteo Vittori; Marco Racioppi; Francesco Pinto; Emilio Sacco; PierFrancesco Bassi
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-03-12
View more
  2 in total

1.  Autophagy activation protects shock wave induced renal tubular epithelial cell apoptosis may through modulation of Akt/ GSK-3β pathway.

Authors:  Qingzhi Long; Xiang Li; Hui He; Dalin He
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 6.580

2.  Can intervals in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy sessions affect success in the treatment of upper ureteral stones?

Authors:  Turgay Turan; Ozgur Efioglu; Yavuz Onur Danacioglu; Furkan Sendogan; Meftun Culpan; Bilal Gunaydin; Ramazan Gokhan Atis; Turhan Caskurlu; Asif Yildirim
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 1.195

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.