Literature DB >> 19190051

Cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement shows reduced radiolucency at one year.

H Pandit1, C Jenkins, D J Beard, J Gallagher, A J Price, C A F Dodd, J W Goodfellow, D W Murray.   

Abstract

We randomised 62 knees to receive either cemented or cementless versions of the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement. The implants used in both arms of the study were similar, except that the cementless components were coated with porous titanium and hydroxyapatite. The tibial interfaces were studied with fluoroscopically-aligned radiographs. At one year there was no difference in clinical outcome between the two groups. Narrow radiolucent lines were seen at the bone-implant interfaces in 75% of cemented tibial components. These were partial in 43%, and complete in 32%. In the cementless implants, partial radiolucencies were seen in 7% and complete radiolucencies in none. These differences are statistically significant (p < 0.0001) and imply satisfactory bone ingrowth into the cementless implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19190051     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B2.21413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  30 in total

1.  Extended sagittal saw cut significantly reduces fracture load in cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to cemented tibia plateaus: an experimental cadaver study.

Authors:  J B Seeger; D Haas; S Jäger; E Röhner; S Tohtz; M Clarius
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  [Recommendations for unicondylar knee replacement in the course of time : A current inventory].

Authors:  J Beckmann; M T Hirschmann; G Matziolis; J Holz; R V Eisenhart-Rothe; C Becher
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  [Revision after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  G Mohr; J Martin; M Clarius
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Outcome after high tibial open-wedge osteotomy: a retrospective evaluation of 533 patients.

Authors:  Stephanie Floerkemeier; Alex E Staubli; Steffen Schroeter; Sabine Goldhahn; Philipp Lobenhoffer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Cementless fixation in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Campi; H G Pandit; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Cementless versus cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early results of a non-designer user group.

Authors:  B Kerens; M G M Schotanus; B Boonen; P Boog; P J Emans; H Lacroix; N P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Assessment of radiolucent lines in patients with lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and the relationship between these lines and the outcome.

Authors:  Long Xue; Huaming Xue; Tao Wen; Mengying Guan; Tao Yang; Tong Ma; Yihui Tu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Long-term clinical results of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Numa Mercier; Simon Wimsey; Dominique Saragaglia
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Five-year experience of cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  H G Pandit; S Campi; T W Hamilton; O D Dada; S Pollalis; C Jenkins; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Results with nine years mean follow up on one hundred and three KAPS® uni knee arthroplasties: eighty six medial and seventeen lateral.

Authors:  Dominique Saragaglia; Adrien Bevand; Ramsay Refaie; Brice Rubens-Duval; Régis Pailhé
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-12-17       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.