Literature DB >> 29249013

Results with nine years mean follow up on one hundred and three KAPS® uni knee arthroplasties: eighty six medial and seventeen lateral.

Dominique Saragaglia1, Adrien Bevand2, Ramsay Refaie3, Brice Rubens-Duval2, Régis Pailhé2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to present the results of the KAPS® uni knee arthroplasty system, both mobile and fixed bearing with reference to function, alignment and complications in 103 implants with a mean follow-up of nine years.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 103 unicompartimental knee arthroplasties in 89 patients operated on between March 2005 and March 2010. The population was composed of 50 males and 39 females, with a mean age of 70.5 ± 7.5 years (41 - 90). Eighty-seven patients had a genu varum deformity (84.5%), one of whom had an osteoid osteoma of the lateral tibial plateau and 16 patients had a genu valgum (15.5%). Eighty-six medial prostheses were implanted (82 mobile bearings and 4 fixed bearings) and 17 lateral prostheses (all fixed bearings) including the osteoid osteoma.
RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 107.5 months (73-138), 72 knees (58 patients) were reviewed (70%). The mean IKS score was of 173 ± 31 points (58 - 200). The mean Oxford knee score was 21 ± 8 points (12 - 50). The cumulated survival rate at a follow up of 132 months was 98.2%.
CONCLUSION: The KAPS® unicompartmental knee arthroplasty gives efficacious and safe outcomes in the majority of cases at a mean follow-up of nine years. The availability of both fixed and mobile bearings with the same instrumentation, allowing to choose the right implant intra-operatively, is a great advantage in order to avoid the occurrence of some complications, specific to mobile bearing prostheses (dislocation and over-correction).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genu valgum; Genu varum; Gonarthrosis; Mobile bearing; Unicompartimental knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29249013     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3717-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  18 in total

Review 1.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Todd Borus; Thomas Thornhill
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement shows reduced radiolucency at one year.

Authors:  H Pandit; C Jenkins; D J Beard; J Gallagher; A J Price; C A F Dodd; J W Goodfellow; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-02

3.  No long-term difference between fixed and mobile medial unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sebastien Parratte; Vanessa Pauly; Jean-Manuel Aubaniac; Jean-Noel A Argenson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Navigation of the tibial plateau alone appears to be sufficient in computer-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dominique Saragaglia; Frédéric Picard; Ramsay Refaie
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Computerised navigation of unicondylar knee prostheses: from primary implantation to revision to total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dominique Saragaglia; Benoit Marques Da Silva; Pierrick Dijoux; Jérémy Cognault; Julia Gaillot; Régis Pailhé
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The Marmor knee replacement.

Authors:  L Marmor
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.472

7.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is effective: ten year results.

Authors:  Michele Vasso; Chiara Del Regno; Carlo Perisano; Antonio D'Amelio; Katia Corona; Alfredo Schiavone Panni
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Long-term clinical results of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Numa Mercier; Simon Wimsey; Dominique Saragaglia
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Results of a French multicentre retrospective experience with four hundred and eighteen failed unicondylar knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Dominique Saragaglia; Michel Bonnin; David Dejour; Gérard Deschamps; Christophe Chol; Benoit Chabert; Ramsay Refaie
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  The clinical outcome of minimally invasive Phase 3 Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 15-year follow-up of 1000 UKAs.

Authors:  H Pandit; T W Hamilton; C Jenkins; S J Mellon; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.082

View more
  2 in total

1.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is superior to high tibial osteotomy in post-operative recovery and participation in recreational and sports activities.

Authors:  Man Soo Kim; In Jun Koh; Sueen Sohn; Ji Hwan Jeong; Yong In
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The patient results and satisfaction of knee arthroplasty in a validated grading system.

Authors:  Christiaan Rudolf Oosthuizen; Catherine Van Der Straeten; Innocent Maposa; Christian Hugo Snyckers; Duwayne Peter Vermaak; Sebastian Magobotha
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 3.075

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.