OBJECTIVE: To examine the trajectory of marital adjustment, satisfaction and dissolution among 121 hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) couples-as a function of role (patient or spouse) and gender. METHODS: Prospective, longitudinal design. Participants completed the Dyadic Adjustment Scale at six time points: pre-transplant (4-7 days after beginning medical workup prior to starting transplant), 6 months post-transplant, and 1, 2, 3 and 5 years post-transplant. They also reported on marital status over time. RESULTS:Participants ranged in age from 23-68 (52% female patients and 48% female spouses). Ninety-eight patients received an allogeneic transplant; 23 received an autologous transplant. Marital dissolution was uncommon (four divorces since the transplant among 55 participating 5-year survivors, 7%). Dyadic satisfaction was stable over time for both male and female patients and male spouses, but not for female spouses who reported reductions in satisfaction at all time points relative to baseline. CONCLUSION: Couples were by and large resilient. However, caregiver-specific gender differences indicate an increased risk for relationship maladjustment and dissatisfaction among female spouses and ultimately, female spouse/male patient couples.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To examine the trajectory of marital adjustment, satisfaction and dissolution among 121 hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) couples-as a function of role (patient or spouse) and gender. METHODS: Prospective, longitudinal design. Participants completed the Dyadic Adjustment Scale at six time points: pre-transplant (4-7 days after beginning medical workup prior to starting transplant), 6 months post-transplant, and 1, 2, 3 and 5 years post-transplant. They also reported on marital status over time. RESULTS:Participants ranged in age from 23-68 (52% female patients and 48% female spouses). Ninety-eight patients received an allogeneic transplant; 23 received an autologous transplant. Marital dissolution was uncommon (four divorces since the transplant among 55 participating 5-year survivors, 7%). Dyadic satisfaction was stable over time for both male and female patients and male spouses, but not for female spouses who reported reductions in satisfaction at all time points relative to baseline. CONCLUSION: Couples were by and large resilient. However, caregiver-specific gender differences indicate an increased risk for relationship maladjustment and dissatisfaction among female spouses and ultimately, female spouse/male patient couples.
Authors: F Joly; J F Héron; L Kalusinski; P Bottet; D Brune; N Allouache; J Macé-Lesec'h; J E Couëtte; J Pény; M Henry-Amar Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-01-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: P J Hayden; F Keogh; M Ni Conghaile; M Carroll; M Crowley; N Fitzsimon; N Gardiner; E Vandenberghe; J O'Riordan; S R McCann Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Andrew Christensen; David C Atkins; Sara Berns; Jennifer Wheeler; Donald H Baucom; Lorelei E Simpson Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2004-04
Authors: Karen L Syrjala; Shelby L Langer; Janet R Abrams; Barry Storer; Jean E Sanders; Mary E D Flowers; Paul J Martin Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-05-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Marcia Grant; Liz Cooke; Anna Cathy Williams; Smita Bhatia; Leslie Popplewell; Gwen Uman; Stephen Forman Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-02-09 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Eden Brauer; Huibrie C Pieters; Patricia A Ganz; Wendy Landier; Carol Pavlish; MarySue V Heilemann Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Liz Cooke; Marcia Grant; Deborah H Eldredge; Richard T Maziarz; Lillian M Nail Journal: Eur J Oncol Nurs Date: 2011-02-09 Impact factor: 2.398
Authors: Margaret Bevans; Areej El-Jawahri; D Kathryn Tierney; Lori Wiener; William A Wood; Flora Hoodin; Erin E Kent; Paul B Jacobsen; Stephanie J Lee; Matthew M Hsieh; Ellen M Denzen; Karen L Syrjala Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: A J Applebaum; M Bevans; T Son; K Evans; M Hernandez; S Giralt; K DuHamel Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2016-06-13 Impact factor: 5.483