Literature DB >> 3783422

Relationship quality of partners in heterosexual married, heterosexual cohabiting, and gay and lesbian relationships.

L A Kurdek, J P Schmitt.   

Abstract

The relationship quality of partners in 44 married, 35 heterosexual cohabiting, 50 gay, and 56 lesbian monogamous couples was studied. Each couple lived together and did not have children living with them. Relationship quality was dimensionalized as love for partner, liking of partner, and relationship satisfaction. Cohabiting partners had the lowest Love for Partner and Relationship Satisfaction scores. Differences were also found among partner types on: barriers to leaving the relationship, alternatives to the relationship, a belief that mindreading is expected in the relationship, masculinity, femininity, androgyny, dyadic attachment, shared decision making, and perceived social support from family. The four partner groups did not differ in psychological adjustment. For each type of partner, love for partner was related to many barriers to leaving the relationship and high dyadic attachment; liking of partner was related to few alternatives to the relationship, high dyadic attachment, and high shared decision making; and relationship satisfaction was related to many attractions, few alternatives, few beliefs regarding disagreement is destructive to the relationship, high dyadic attachment, and high shared decision making. Stepwise multiple regression procedures were used to identify the best set of predictors for each partner type. Results are discussed in the context of existing models of relationship quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3783422     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.51.4.711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  9 in total

1.  The association of idealization and intimacy factors with condom use in gay male couples.

Authors:  J L Mcneal
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  1997-12

2.  Concordance in Reported Love, Trust, and Relationship Quality among Same-Sex Male Relationships.

Authors:  Anna Bratcher; Erin Kahle; Patrick Sullivan; Marco A Hidalgo; Matthew J Mimiaga; Rob Garofalo; Dana Pardee; Samuel Hoehnle; Jennie Thai; Ruth Dana; Rob Stephenson
Journal:  J Relatsh Res       Date:  2019-01-15

3.  The impact of perceived discrimination on the intimate relationships of black lesbians.

Authors:  V M Mays; S D Cochran; S Rhue
Journal:  J Homosex       Date:  1993

4.  Relationship characteristics and motivations behind agreements among gay male couples: differences by agreement type and couple serostatus.

Authors:  Colleen C Hoff; Sean C Beougher; Deepalika Chakravarty; Lynae A Darbes; Torsten B Neilands
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2010-07

5.  Marital adjustment, satisfaction and dissolution among hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients and spouses: a prospective, five-year longitudinal investigation.

Authors:  Shelby L Langer; Jean C Yi; Barry E Storer; Karen L Syrjala
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Breakup-related appraisals and the psychological well-being of young adult gay and bisexual men.

Authors:  Peter Ceglarek; Lynae Darbes; Rob Stephenson; Jose Bauermeister
Journal:  J Gay Lesbian Ment Health       Date:  2017-02-10

7.  The Qualities of Same-Sex and Different-Sex Couples in Young Adulthood.

Authors:  Kara Joyner; Wendy Manning; Barbara Prince
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2018-10-10

8.  Validation of the Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction Questionnaire in adults with a same-sex partner.

Authors:  Cristóbal Calvillo; María Del Mar Sánchez-Fuentes; Tesifón Parrón-Carreño; Juan Carlos Sierra
Journal:  Int J Clin Health Psychol       Date:  2019-11-10

9.  Love Forgiveness and Subjective Well-Being in Chinese College Students: The Mediating Role of Interpersonal Relationships.

Authors:  Tianyi Cheng; Qiyi Lin; Hong Fu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.