BACKGROUND: Cancer affects both men and women, yet systematic understanding of the role of gender in caregiving and dyadic caregiver-patient interactions is lacking. Thus, it may be useful to review how gender theories apply to cancer caregiving and to evaluate the adequacy of current cancer caregiving studies to the gender theories. METHODS: Several databases, including MEDLINE (Ovid), PsychINFO, PubMed, and CINAHL, were used for searching articles published in English between 2000 and 2016. The search was restricted by age (≥18) and yielded 602 articles, which were subject to further screen and review based on selection criteria. Of 108 full texts reviewed to determine inclusion eligibility for this review, 55 met the criteria and included for review. RESULTS: The reviewed studies supported the "gender role" and "doing gender" perspectives for caregiver selection. The role identity, role strain, and transactional stress theories were supported for predicting caregiving outcomes at the individual level. Furthermore, attachment, self-determination, and interdependence theories incorporated caregiver factors that predicted the patients' outcomes, and vice versa. CONCLUSION: Despite limited gender theory-driven research in cancer caregiving and psycho-oncology in general, the utility of gender theories in (a) identifying subgroups of caregiver-patient dyads who are vulnerable to the adverse effects of cancer in the family and (b) developing evidence-based interventions is promising. Integrating broader issues of medical trajectory, lifespan, sociocultural, and biological factors in gender-oriented research and practice in psycho-oncology is encouraged.
BACKGROUND:Cancer affects both men and women, yet systematic understanding of the role of gender in caregiving and dyadic caregiver-patient interactions is lacking. Thus, it may be useful to review how gender theories apply to cancer caregiving and to evaluate the adequacy of current cancer caregiving studies to the gender theories. METHODS: Several databases, including MEDLINE (Ovid), PsychINFO, PubMed, and CINAHL, were used for searching articles published in English between 2000 and 2016. The search was restricted by age (≥18) and yielded 602 articles, which were subject to further screen and review based on selection criteria. Of 108 full texts reviewed to determine inclusion eligibility for this review, 55 met the criteria and included for review. RESULTS: The reviewed studies supported the "gender role" and "doing gender" perspectives for caregiver selection. The role identity, role strain, and transactional stress theories were supported for predicting caregiving outcomes at the individual level. Furthermore, attachment, self-determination, and interdependence theories incorporated caregiver factors that predicted the patients' outcomes, and vice versa. CONCLUSION: Despite limited gender theory-driven research in cancer caregiving and psycho-oncology in general, the utility of gender theories in (a) identifying subgroups of caregiver-patient dyads who are vulnerable to the adverse effects of cancer in the family and (b) developing evidence-based interventions is promising. Integrating broader issues of medical trajectory, lifespan, sociocultural, and biological factors in gender-oriented research and practice in psycho-oncology is encouraged.
Authors: Rachel L Spillers; David K Wellisch; Youngmee Kim; B Alex Matthews; Frank Baker Journal: Psychosomatics Date: 2008 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.386
Authors: John L Oliffe; Lawrence W Mróz; Joan L Bottorff; Debbie E Braybrook; Amanda Ward; S Larry Goldenberg; Larry S Goldenberg Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-12-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Laura B Dunn; Bradley E Aouizerat; Bruce A Cooper; Marylin Dodd; Kathryn Lee; Claudia West; Steven M Paul; William Wara; Patrick Swift; Christine Miaskowski Journal: Eur J Oncol Nurs Date: 2011-02-13 Impact factor: 2.398
Authors: Mateusz Grajek; Karolina Krupa-Kotara; Mateusz Rozmiarek; Karolina Sobczyk; Eliza Działach; Michał Górski; Joanna Kobza Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-10 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Marcin J Jabłoński; Francisco García-Torres; Paulina Zielińska; Alicja Bułat; Piotr Brandys Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 3.390