Literature DB >> 19184385

A comparison of health behaviors of women in centering pregnancy and traditional prenatal care.

Kaylynn Shakespear1, Phillip J Waite, Julie Gast.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Researchers sought to determine the difference in health behaviors between women who receive prenatal care via the Centering Pregnancy approach and those involved in traditional prenatal care.
METHODS: Using a cross-sectional design, adult pregnant women (n = 125) were surveyed from at least 28 weeks gestation to delivery. The sample was comprised of primarily white low income women.
RESULTS: Using multiple linear regression it was determined that women in Centering Pregnancy had significantly lower index health behavior scores compared with the traditional care group showing that those in Centering Pregnancy reported engaging in fewer health promoting behaviors. Furthermore, no differences were observed for smoking or weight gain behaviors between groups. Additionally, those in Centering Pregnancy reported a lower perceived value of prenatal care.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that Centering Pregnancy is not adequately aiding its patients in adopting healthy behaviors during pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19184385     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-009-0448-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  19 in total

1.  Medically advised, mother's personal target, and actual weight gain during pregnancy.

Authors:  M E Cogswell; K S Scanlon; S B Fein; L A Schieve
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: history, challenges, and directions for future research.

Authors:  G R Alexander; M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Prenatal health promotion content and health behaviors.

Authors:  Susan C Vonderheid; Kathleen F Norr; Arden S Handler
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.967

4.  Psychosocial and demographic factors related to health behaviors in the 1st trimester.

Authors:  L O Walker; A T Cooney; M W Riggs
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec

Review 5.  Does prenatal care improve birth outcomes? A critical review.

Authors:  K Fiscella
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Testing the Health Practices in Pregnancy Questionnaire-II.

Authors:  Kelly Lindgren
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

7.  Pregnancy outcomes of adolescents enrolled in a CenteringPregnancy program.

Authors:  Mary Alice Grady; Kathaleen C Bloom
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.388

8.  Group prenatal care and preterm birth weight: results from a matched cohort study at public clinics.

Authors:  Jeannette R Ickovics; Trace S Kershaw; Claire Westdahl; Sharon Schindler Rising; Carrie Klima; Heather Reynolds; Urania Magriples
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Comparison of centering pregnancy to traditional care in Hispanic mothers.

Authors:  Bethany Robertson; Dawn M Aycock; Laura A Darnell
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-05-09

Review 10.  The role of prenatal care in preventing low birth weight.

Authors:  G R Alexander; C C Korenbrot
Journal:  Future Child       Date:  1995
View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  A review of prenatal group care literature: the need for a structured theoretical framework and systematic evaluation.

Authors:  Jeanelle Sheeder; Kim Weber Yorga; Karolyn Kabir-Greher
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-01

Review 2.  Group versus conventional antenatal care for women.

Authors:  Christine J Catling; Nancy Medley; Maralyn Foureur; Clare Ryan; Nicky Leap; Alison Teate; Caroline S E Homer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-04

3.  Excess Gestational Weight Gain in Low-Income Overweight and Obese Women: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Cynthie K Anderson; Tanis J Walch; Sara M Lindberg; Aubrey M Smith; Steven R Lindheim; Leah D Whigham
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.045

4.  Women's Perceptions Using the CenteringPregnancy Model of Group Prenatal Care.

Authors:  Deb Risisky; Syed Masood Asghar; Madeline Chaffee; Nancy DeGennaro
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2013

5.  Women's experience with group prenatal care in a rural community in northern Nigeria.

Authors:  Sunday E Adaji; Adenike Jimoh; Umma Bawa; Habiba I Ibrahim; Abiola A Olorukooba; Hamdalla Adelaiye; Comfort Garba; Anita Lukong; Suleiman Idris; Oladapo S Shittu
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.561

6.  Improving Prenatal Care for Minority Women.

Authors:  Susan Gennaro; Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk; Caitlin OʼConnor; Anne M Gibeau; Ellen Nadel
Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.412

Review 7.  Group Prenatal Care Compared With Traditional Prenatal Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ebony B Carter; Lorene A Temming; Jennifer Akin; Susan Fowler; George A Macones; Graham A Colditz; Methodius G Tuuli
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Vulnerable Women's Perceptions of Individual Versus Group Prenatal Care: Results of a Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Erin Hetherington; Suzanne Tough; Deborah McNeil; Hamideh Bayrampour; Amy Metcalfe
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-11

9.  Comparing CenteringPregnancy® to standard prenatal care plus prenatal education.

Authors:  Ingunn Benediktsson; Sheila W McDonald; Monica Vekved; Deborah A McNeil; Siobhan M Dolan; Suzanne C Tough
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Perinatal outcomes of uninsured immigrant, refugee and migrant mothers and newborns living in Toronto, Canada.

Authors:  Karline Wilson-Mitchell; Joanna Anneke Rummens
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.