Literature DB >> 14672486

Group prenatal care and preterm birth weight: results from a matched cohort study at public clinics.

Jeannette R Ickovics1, Trace S Kershaw, Claire Westdahl, Sharon Schindler Rising, Carrie Klima, Heather Reynolds, Urania Magriples.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of group versus individual prenatal care on birth weight and gestational age.
METHODS: This prospective, matched cohort study included pregnant women (N = 458) entering prenatal care at 24 or less weeks' gestation; one half received group prenatal care with women of the same gestational age. Women were matched by clinic, age, race, parity, and infant birth date. Women were predominantly black and Hispanic of low socioeconomic status, served by one of three public clinics in Atlanta, Georgia or New Haven, Connecticut.
RESULTS: Birth weight was greater for infants of women in group versus individual prenatal care (P < .01). Among those born preterm, infants of group patients were significantly larger than infants of individual-care patients (mean, 2398 versus 1990 g, P < .05). Although not statistically significant, infants of group patients were less likely than those of individual-care patients to be low birth weight (less than 2500 g; 16 versus 23 infants); very low birth weight (less than 1500 g; three versus six infants); early preterm (less than 33 weeks; two versus seven infants); or to experience neonatal loss (none versus three infants). There were no differences in number of prenatal visits or other risk characteristics (patient age, race, prior preterm birth).
CONCLUSIONS: Group prenatal care results in higher birth weight, especially for infants delivered preterm. Group prenatal care provides a structural innovation, permitting more time for provider-patient interaction and therefore the opportunity to address clinical as well as psychological, social, and behavioral factors to promote healthy pregnancy. Results have implications for design of sustainable prenatal services that might contribute to reduction of racial disparities in adverse perinatal outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14672486     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00765-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  63 in total

1.  The impact of physical maltreatment history on the adolescent mother-infant relationship: mediating and moderating effects during the transition to early parenthood.

Authors:  Stephanie Milan; Jessica Lewis; Kathleen Ethier; Trace Kershaw; Jeannette R Ickovics
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2004-06

Review 2.  A review of prenatal group care literature: the need for a structured theoretical framework and systematic evaluation.

Authors:  Jeanelle Sheeder; Kim Weber Yorga; Karolyn Kabir-Greher
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-01

3.  Exploring the group prenatal care model: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Kathleen Thielen
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2012

4.  Race, Socioeconomic Status, and Age: Exploring Intersections in Preterm Birth Disparities among Teen Mothers.

Authors:  Sheryl L Coley; Tracy R Nichols; Kelly L Rulison; Robert E Aronson; Shelly L Brown-Jeffy; Sharon D Morrison
Journal:  Int J Popul Res       Date:  2015

5.  America's Health Centers: reducing racial and ethnic disparities in perinatal care and birth outcomes.

Authors:  Leiyu Shi; Gregory D Stevens; John T Wulu; Robert M Politzer; Jiahong Xu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  Structural interventions: concepts, challenges and opportunities for research.

Authors:  K M Blankenship; S R Friedman; S Dworkin; J E Mantell
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.671

7.  Promoting Healthy Pregnancies Through Perinatal Groups: A Comparison of CenteringPregnancy(R) Group Prenatal Care and Childbirth Education Classes.

Authors:  Deborah S Walker; Renee Worrell
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2008

Review 8.  Group versus conventional antenatal care for women.

Authors:  Christine J Catling; Nancy Medley; Maralyn Foureur; Clare Ryan; Nicky Leap; Alison Teate; Caroline S E Homer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-04

9.  A comparison of health behaviors of women in centering pregnancy and traditional prenatal care.

Authors:  Kaylynn Shakespear; Phillip J Waite; Julie Gast
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2009-01-29

10.  Hearing aid effectiveness after aural rehabilitation - individual versus group (HEARING) trial: RCT design and baseline characteristics.

Authors:  Margaret P Collins; Pamela E Souza; Chuan-Fen Liu; Patrick J Heagerty; Dagmar Amtmann; Bevan Yueh
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.